5.2 Trial - defendant issues Flashcards
Which statutory provision empowers the Magistrates Court to try a defendant in absentia?
Section 11 Magistrates Courts Act 1980
When does the magistrates court’s power to try in absentia arise?
Section 11(1) Magistrates Courts Act 1980 ... where at the time and place appointed for the trial ... the prosecutor appears but the accused does not
Is the magistrates court’s power to try in absentia obligatory or discretionary?
Section 11(1) Magistrates Courts Act 1980 (a) [children - discretionary] (b) [adults - obligatory]
How must the magistrates court proceed when trying in absentia?
CrimPR 24.12(3)
Where the defendant is absent—
(a)
the general rule is that the court must proceed as if the defendant—
(i) were present, and
(ii) had pleaded not guilty (unless a plea already has been taken)
and the court must give reasons if it does not do so
When will the Magistrates Court not proceed in the absence of an adult defendant?
Section 11 Magistrates Courts Act 1980
(2A)
The court shall not proceed in the absence of the accused if it considers that there is an acceptable reason for his failure to appear.
However…
(6)
Nothing in this section requires the court to enquire into the reasons for the accused’s failure to appear before deciding whether to proceed in his absence.
What happens after D is convicted in absentia in the Magistrates Court?
Section 10(3) Magistrates Court Act 1980 The court may adjourn for up to 4 weeks or proceed to sentencing.
When can a trial proceed in the Crown Court in the absence of the defendant?
CrimPR 25.2(1)(b)
the court must not proceed if the defendant is absent, unless the court is satisfied that—
(i)
the defendant has waived the right to attend, and
(ii)
the trial will be fair despite the defendant’s absence
What happens where D fails to attend trial?
The judge can issue a ‘bench warrant’ for D’s arrest.
and
D has committed the offence of failing to surrender, contrary to Section 6 Bail Act 1976.
What is the leading case on the Crown Court’s discretion to proceed or not proceed in absentia?
R v Jones [2003] 1 AC 1
What must the Crown Court take into account when deciding whether to proceed in the absence of the defendant?
R v Jones [2003] 1 AC 1
- The nature and circumstances of D’s behaviour, especially whether his absence was voluntary and therefore waived his right to be present;
- Whether an adjournment might solve the matter by D attending at a later date;
- The likely length of any adjournment;
- Whether D, despite being absent, wished to be represented at the hearing or has waived his right;
- Fairness;
- The public interest;
- The effect of delay on witnesses’ memories;
- The impact on joint trials.
When can a trial in the Crown Court proceed in the absence of the defendant where his absence if for reasons beyond his control?
R v Jones (no 2) [1972] 2 All ER 731
- D consents, and
- The case can be fully presented without unfairness.
The judge must also warn the jury not to hold D’s absence against him.
How does the court make sure that unrepresented defendants are able to challenge witness evidence?
CrimPR 25.11(6)(b)
The court may—
… where the defendant is not represented, ask a witness any question necessary in the defendant’s interests.
How does the court make sure that unrepresented defendants know what to do in court?
By explaining to D what should happen at each stage of the trial, e.g., that D can put her case to prosecution witnesses in cross-examination and that D can give evidence.
What happens where D’s counsel withdraw or are dismissed but D is still entitled to Legal Aid?
R v Chambers [1989] Crim LR 367
The judge will grant an adjournment to enable D to get new representation.
When can an unrepresented D not cross-examine a witness?
Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999
Section 34 - sex offence complainants
Section 35 - child complainants
Section 36 - the court’s discretion