5.1 Social facilitation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
0
Q

Give an example of social facilitation.

A

Athletes run faster when an audience is present.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

What is social facilitation?

A

The concern with how and why activity is increased (facilitated) when others are present.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is coaction effects?

A

Refers to the presence of others independently carrying out the same task at the same time (such as athletes running at the same time) who’s usually facilitates performance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who found that cyclists rode faster with others an that children could reel a fishing line faster in pairs than on their own?

A

Triplett (1898)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

As well as facilitate performance, what can the presence of others do To behaviour that is not learnt well?

A

It can inhibit behaviour that is complex or not well learnt.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did Schmitt (1986) show?

A

He made participants do two tasks; a) type their name into a computer, b) type their name backwards with numbers in between. It was shown that an audience facilitated performance of the easy task but inhibited performance on the complex task.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explain arousal theory?

A

The presence of others causes an increase in arousal, this causes the individual to respond with their dominant response. Social facilitation or inhibition occurs as their dominant response.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Who showed similar results of social facilitation in cockroaches?

A

Zajonc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the study for arousal theory?

A

Michaels et al (1982)
The aim was to investigate the presence of an audience on performance of above average and below average pool players.
Method: observe and record players from a distance (unknown to the players). Label individuals as above or below average. 4 researchers then went over to the table and watched. Recorded improvement/decrease in ability.
Results: above average = improve when watched (social facilitation)
Below average = decreased when watched (social inhibition).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does the arousal theory not explain?

A

Why someone is competent in a task may still perform poorly in front of an audience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What law explains what arousal theory cannot? Explain this law briefly?

A

Yerks-Dodson law. Level of arousal can reach an optimum level to increase social facilitation. After this, task performance decreases. Graph.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does the arousal theory not acknowledge? Why do people think this is important?

A

Cognitive processes. People believe that thought of competition in co-action, and thought of being judged when watched by am audience, are important factors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is evaluation apprehension theory?

A

Increased arousal due to apprehension and anxiety caused by being evaluated by others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Who developed evaluation apprehension theory?

A

Carttell (1968)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did carttell believe about an increase in arousal?

A

He believed an increase in arousal is a learnt response, as people associate the presence of others with evaluation on their performance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the study for evaluation apprehension theory? Explain it?

A

Henchy and glass (1968). Investigating whether concern about being evaluated is needed to produce a dominant response. Method: 4 conditions of a task -
- alone (controlled condition)
-with 2 ‘experts’
- with 2 non experts
-alone but recorded for later evaluation.
Results: conditions with experts and recorded produced dominant responses. Alone and with non experts produced similar responses.

16
Q

What is a negative of evaluation apprehension theory?

A

It does not explain the social facilitation seen in animals, who presumably do not experience experience apprehension theory.

17
Q

What are the two effects in distraction-conflict theory?

A
  • distraction causes an impaired performance in tasks, both simple and hard tasks.
  • conflict increases arousal and leads to dominant response.
18
Q

What is the study for distraction-conflict theory?

A

Sanders et al (1978)

19
Q

What is the sanders study for distraction-conflict theory?

A

Aim to investigate whether distraction results in social facilitation in simple tasks and social inhibition in complex tasks. The method as so give a simple task and complex digital copying task. The conditions were: done alone, Done with co actor either performing same (distracting) task or performing different (not distracting) task. The results were that facilitation on easy task and inhibition on hard task.

20
Q

What is a positive of distraction conflict theory?

A

Can explain results in animals as they may get distracted too.