5. Pure Psychiatric Harm Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the definition of pure psychiatric harm?

A

psychiatric harm suffered without physical impact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the rules for the type of pure psychiatric harm that will give rise to a duty of care?

A

Injury must be:
* caused by a sudden shock; and either
* a medically recognised psychiatric illness; or
* a shock-induced physical condition (miscarriage, heart attack)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does the ‘sudden shock’ requirement mean for pure psychiatric harm?

A

No duty of care in relation to harm caused by a gradual build-up of events.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does the ‘medically recognised psychiatric illness’ requirement mean for pure psychiatric harm?

A

No duty of care in relation to effects which do not amount to a defined and diagnosed illness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who is a primary victim of pure psychiatric harm?

A

Someone who is involved so:
* was in the actual area of danger; or
* reasonably believed that he was in danger.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the requirements for a duty of care to be owed to a primary victim in relation to their pure psychiatric harm?

A
  • risk of physical injury is foreseeable
  • not necessary for the risk of psychiatric harm to be foreseeable.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Who is a secondary victim of pure psychiatric harm?

A

Not involved in the incident, so;
* witnesses injury to someone else; or
* fears for the safety of another person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What duty of care does a defendant owe a primary victim of pure psychiatric harm?

A

Duty not to cause pure psychiatric harm, provided that the risk of physical injury was foreseeable (although it did not actually occur).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the four requirements that must be satisfied for the court to determine whether a duty of care is owed for pure psychiatric harm suffered by a secondary victim?

A
  1. Foreseeability of psychiatric harm
  2. Proximity of relationship
  3. Proximity in time and space
  4. Proximity of perception

AKA Alcock control mechanishms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the key factor in determining ‘foreseeability of psychiatric harm’ ?

pure psychiatric harm suffered by a secondary victim

A

must be reasonably foreseeable that a person of normal fortitude in the claimant’s position
would suffer a psychiatric illness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the key factor in determining ‘proximity of relationship’ ?

pure psychiatric harm suffered by a secondary victim

A

The claimant must have a close relationship of love and affection with the person who is
endangered by the defendant’s negligence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the key factor in determining ‘proximity in time and space’ ?

pure psychiatric harm suffered by a secondary victim

A

The claimant must be present at the accident or its immediate aftermath.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the key factor in determining ‘proximity of perception’ ?

pure psychiatric harm suffered by a secondary victim

A

The claimant must see or hear the accident, or its immediate aftermath, with their own senses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How does the court view rescuers for the purposes of pure psychiatric harm?

A

Treated in the same way as any other victim who suffers only pure psychiatric harm, which includes professional rescuers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

When will rescuers be considered a primary victim?

Pure Psychiatric Harm

A

If they have been in the actual area of danger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When will rescuers be considered a secondary victim?

Pure Psychiatric Harm

A

Not in the actual area of danger so not exposed to any risk of physical injury.

17
Q

Which of the requirements laid down in Alcock is a rescuer unlikely to meet?

Pure Psychiatric Harm secondary victims

A

Proximity of relationship

18
Q

Once a duty of care has been established, what must the claimant prove?

Pure Psychiatric Harm

A

breach of duty + causation

19
Q

What rule is applied when the claimant is establishing causation of damage?

Pure Psychiatric Harm

A

the egg-shell skull rule