5. Privity of Contract Flashcards
What are the key aspects of the doctrine of privity of contract?
- Only parties to a contract can sue and be sued under it
- A third party β acquire rights under a contract
- A third party β be burdened by a contract
What are the criteria for third party to enforce a term of a contract under Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999?
- Contract expressly provides that the third party may enforce the term
OR
- The term purports to confer a benefit on the third party AND it appears from the terms of the contract that the parties intended the term to be enforceable by the third party
To enforce a term of a contract under Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999, must the third party be named in the contract?
Either named, or be a member of a benefiting class of people described in the contract (but who need not have existed when the contract was made)
Does the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 allow obligations under a contract to flow to third parties?
No, only benefits.
- contract cannot be enforced against third-party
What are some contracts to which Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 does not apply?
- Employment contracts
- Companyβs Articles of Association
- Contracts expressly excluding the Act from applying
What are three instances preventing contracting parties from changing the contract to the detriment of a third party without its consent?
Third party either:
1) Communicated his assent to the term benefiting him, or
2) Promisor is aware that third-party relied on the term, or
3) Foreseeable to promisor that third-party would rely on term.
What are four exceptions allowing for a term to be varied/rescinded without consent from the third-party?
1) Contract expressly provides for it;
2) 3rd partyβs whereabouts cannot be reasonably ascertained;
3) 3rd party is mentally incapable of consenting; or
4) Reliance on term cannot be reasonably ascertained.
How can a third-party acquire direct rights under a contract via agency?
occurs when one of the contracting parties is acting on third partyβs behalf.
What is an exception to the rule that a contract entered into by an agent on behalf of a principal is binding only on the principal and the third party?
Where the agent acts for a principal undisclosed to the third party, both the agent and the principal can sue and be sued under the contract
Can both the benefit and burden of a contract be assigned?
Just the benefit
How can parties transfer obligations under a contract and what is the effect of this measure?
By entering in a novation agreement, which releases the former party/parties, and binds the new party/parties
What is subrogation?
Where a party, by e.g. paying an insurance or making a guarantee payment, stands in the shoes of the contract party and has all the rights the contract party would have against the person responsible for the loss or to whom guarantee was paid
What is the collateral contract exception to privity, and in what situations does it generally arise?
Where collateral contract exists between one of the contracting parties, and the third-party.
- by instructing someone to ie. buy something on your behalf, impliedly enter into side contract with person selling the goods (Shanklin Pier)
- need to ensure that instruction by third party satisfies general offer and consideration requirements.
How can trusts be used to avoid privity issues?
Where main contracting party declares himself to be a trustee for the 3rd party, gives 3rd party direct rights.
- only effective if contract itself contains a declaration of trust = gives notice of trust relationship.
What four conditions need to be satisfied for a contract to be validly assigned to third-party?
- permitted under the terms of the relevant agreement.
- absolute (final)
- in writing
AND - notice must be given to person against whom 3rd party acquires rights as a result of the assignment.