3. Intention to Create Legal Relations; Capacity Flashcards

1
Q

For a contract to be binding, what do both parties need to intend?

A

To be legally bound by it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How must intention to be legally bound be communicated?

A

Mutually, either expressly or impliedly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the presumption regarding intention to be legally bound in domestic situations (married couple, family member)?

A

That the parties do not intend to be legally bound

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is required to rebut the presumption against intention to be legally bound in domestic situations?

A

Objective evidence to the contrary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Even where objective evidence to the contrary is used to rebut presumption against intention to be legally bound in domestic situations, what will prevent it from being rebutted?

A

If either party has actual knowledge that the other does not intend to be legally bound

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the presumption regarding intention to be legally bound in social situations?

A

Same as domestic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a situation in which the courts have found the presumption against intention to be legally bound in social situations to be rebutted?

A

Where friends or family members join together to enter a race or competition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What trap on the exam concerning a social situation should we look out for?

A

Social parties, e.g. friends or family, acting within a commercial context

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the presumption regarding intention to be legally bound in commercial situations?

A

Strong presumption that the parties intend to be legally bound

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is required to rebut the presumption against intention to be legally bound in commercial situations?

A

Clear and unambiguous evidence to the contrary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

If a commercial party does not intend to be legally bound, what should they do to rebut the presumption?

A

State that their agreement is β€œsubject to contract” or β€œbinding in honour only”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the implication in a commercial situation where an agreement is subject to contract?

A

That a legally binding agreement will follow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the effect of a contract entered into by a minor?

A

Voidable by the minor, with some exceptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When is a minor bound by a contract?

A

When they ratify the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How does a minor ratify a contract?

A

By adopting it after they turn 18

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are three exceptions to the general rule that a contract cannot be binding on a minor?

A
  1. Contracts for necessaries
  2. Employment contracts that benefit them
  3. Contracts for the acquisition of a permanent interest in property
17
Q

What contracts for necessaries are binding on a minor?

A

Any contract for necessary goods or services at a reasonable price

18
Q

In the context of a contract for necessaries with a minor, what is deemed β€œnecessary”?

A

This is subjective, based on the minor in question

19
Q

When is a contract for the acquisition of a permanent interest in property not binding on a minor?

A

When the minor expressly repudiates the contract

20
Q

Why is a contract for the acquisition of a permanent interest in property binding on a minor, unless expressly repudiated?

A

Because under the contract, an ownership interest passes to the minor

21
Q

Under the Minors’ Contracts Act 1987, what will the court do in a situation where under a contract, the other party has transferred property to the minor under a voidable contract?

A

Require the minor the send the property back, if it is just and equitable to do so

22
Q

What is the effect of a contract entered into by an individual lacking mental capacity?

A

Voidable, if the other party knew that they lacked capacity

23
Q

What are four factors to consider when judging if a person lacks capacity?

A
  1. Unable to understand information relevant to the decision
  2. Unable to retain such information
  3. Unable to weigh up such information
  4. Unable to communicate their decision
24
Q

If a person lacking mental capacity enters into a contract, can they ratify the contract?

A

When they recover

25
Q

Does the necessaries exception apply to mental incapacity?

A

Yes

26
Q

Is intoxication considered a mental incapacity?

A

Yes

27
Q

What does the Companies Act 2006 say about corporate capacity?

A

The validity of an act done by a company cannot be called into question by reason of anything in the company’s constitution

28
Q

How do courts analyse the question of certainty when determining whether a contract exists?

A

term must be β€˜too uncertain and vague’ to be enforceable.
- rebut any presumption of an intention to enter into legally binding agreement.

Factors courts will consider:
1) Look at past transactions performed under the agreement;
2) Clause provides for the appointment of a third-party if the parties are in disagreement (ie. arbitrator).
3) Whether the agreement is missing essential terms (ie. time, quantity)

29
Q

What is the outcome of a contracting with a minor?

A

contract is voidable

30
Q

What is the outcome of an uncertain contract?

A

void

31
Q

In the context of contracts with minors/incapacitated persons, what are necessaries?

A

Essentials individual cannot live without, including include food, clothing, lodging, education, essential services.

Assessed by taking into account their condition in life (ie. minor living on council estate versus stately home).

  • Note - where relevant person already has enough an abundance of the good in question, then more cannot be necessary (Nash v Inam)
32
Q
A