4.2 - The Relationship Between The Executive And Parliament Flashcards
What is an elective dictatorship
A government that dominates parliament, due to a large majority and therefore has few limits on its power
What did conservatives politician lord halisham argue about the power of a gov
- the only real check on executive power is the periodic holding of a general election, in between, the executive can do more or less anything it wants, even introducing irreversible changes
What’s an example of governments more or less being able to do what they want
- in the 2003 Blair gov ( elected 2 years earlier on 40% of vote), first attempted to abolish the post of lord chancellor without prior consultation, then carried out drastic remodelling of the office in 2005 constitutional reform act
- David Cameron was backed by leaders of labour and Lib Dem’s to devolve more power to Scotland if referendum in 2014 was rejected
What combination of factors lead to elective dominance
- The FPTP system delivers single-party gov and sometimes gets benefit of a large parliamentary majority based on a small share of the popular vote
- whip system and PM use of patronage reinforces party loyalty and discipline
- the use of the Salisbury convention and the parliaments acts to limit opposition to a gov’s programme from HOL.
What are the 3 main ways parliament will hold the executive to account
- parliaments influence over gov legislation
- parliament scrutiny of over gov activities
- parliaments ability to remove governments and ministers
What influence does parliament have over gov legislation
- parliamentary rebellions have become more common, but defeats for gov measures are rare. Blair didn’t lose one til after 2005, when his majority dropped by 100 seats.
- more commonly, a gov which fears defeat will withdraw a law they want introduced.
- sometimes opposition can compel a PM to allow a free vote, eg Cameron in 2013, half his Conservative Party didn’t want same sex marriage legalised, but he won the vote bcs of support from Labour Party
( add more detail)
How does parliament scrutinise other government activities
Add detail cba rn
What ability does parliament have to remove governments and ministers
- in theory, commons can remove a gov by issuing a vote of no confidence, but this happened since march 1979
- even if it were to happen, the fixed term parliaments act allows a PM who looses a vote of no confidence 2 weeks to form a new gov
In what ways has given control over parliament reduced
- increased amount of rebellions
- gov have accepted restrictions on the exercise of certain prerogatives such as right to authorise military action, fixed terms act removed PM power to choose date of a general election unless they get support of 2/3 of MPs
- crestion of backbench committee in 2010 gives backbench MPs more control over choice of topics for debate
- select committees have grown in status
In what ways do the government still retain a large degree of control over parliament
- power of whips and PM patronage
- Gov retains number of powers, including right to change laws using secondary legislation
- gov controls greater part of legislative schedule
- ministers can obstruct select committees from summoning officials to their hearings
- the Lords usually refers to the will of the elected house after a period of ‘parliamentary ping pong)
What changes in recent decades have limited executive dominance over parliament
- intro of wright reforms, making executive more accountable to parliament and increasing power of backbenchers
- one key wright reform was making select committees chairs elected by their fellow MPs in a secret ballot within party groups, making scrutiny of executive more effective
How has the reformed house of lords limited executive dominance over parliament
- reform has made it more professional and independent, no longer has a built in conservative majority
- more professional as many are ex pro politicians who are able to provide leadership in HOL EG: Lord Andrew Adonis is a labour peer who served as Secretary of State for transport under Gordan brown
- as life peers aren’t elected, less pressure to vote along party lines, leading to more defeats for gov in HOL then HOC, EG: Blair defeated 4 times in HOC but 353 times in HOL