4.1.7 The distribution of income and wealth: poverty and inequality Flashcards
What is income?
The inflow of money from factors of production or assets, such as from a job, welfare payments, interest or dividends.
What is wealth?
A stock of financial assets, such as a house, shares, land, cars and savings.
What is the difference between income and wealth?
Income is a flow of money from assets, whereas wealth is a stock of financial assets
What factors influence the distribution of income?
- Supply of labour decided by level of employment; education/training, nature of job, geography, population, skills, FoP availability, country development level
- Demand for labour decided by; level of demand for product (derived demand), minimum wage
- Welfare payments and taxes
- Trade unions, as they can set minimum wages
What are the factors that influence the distribution of wealth?
- Inheritance
- FoP ownership, such as capital
- Surplus of income to spending
- Government policy, such as inheritance tax
- Access to financial services, such as credit and interest rates
- Privilege/contacts
What is equity?
Fairness, or what is considered to be an acceptable distribution of income and wealth in society (could be subjective)
What is equality?
The equal distribution of wealth and income in society, so that everyone has the same income
What is the difference between equality and equity in relation to the distribution of income and wealth?
- Equality refers to the equal distribution of wealth and income in society, so that everyone has the same income
- Equity refers to fairness, or what is considered to be an acceptable distribution of income and wealth in society, so can be subjective
How is income/wealth inequality measured?
The Lorenz curve and the Gini coefficient (A/A+B)
What are the positive consequences of inequality (free market view)?
- It gives incentive to worker harder, providing motivation, increasing productivity and efficiency
- Profit motive can decrease costs, which is an improved answer to the economic problem
What are the negative consequences of inequality?
- Reduced quality of life for the poor
- Decreased government budget caused from more crime, more government spending on benefits, and a potential decrease in tax revenue
- Poor cannot afford to invest in themselves (health/education), decreasing human capital, decreasing long run growth
- Creative destruction, increasing structural unemployment, so people need to learn new skills
Why might wealth inequality be seen as being worse than income inequality?
- Wealth is perpetuated and passed on between generations
- Wealth is harder to increase/change/equalise
- Wealth inequality is more extensive than income inequality
- Wealth can be hidden more easily than income
- Income is easier to target and tax
Why might income inequality be seen as being worse than wealth inequality?
- Income inequality leads to wealth inequality
- Income inequality leads to a worsening government budget due to increased benefits
What is the trickle down effect?
- If we allow the rich to get richer, spending increases, increasing income for others, so everybody is better off
- However, this can be seen as an excuse for free market economics and to minimise intervention
- Following the implementation of this idea has worsened inequality, as the wealthy may not spend in the local economy
What diagram can represent the trickle down effect?
The Kuznets curve
What is absolute poverty?
- Living below subsistence, meaning that the person is unable to afford necessities
- The number of people living on less than $1.25 per day according to the World Bank
What is relative poverty?
- Lower than a given proportion of the median income in the country
- Those below 60% of the median income in the UK
What are the causes of poverty?
- Inequality in wages/ unemployment: if workers can earn a higher level of education, they can access jobs with higher wages
- Welfare payments: tend to increase less than wages, so those on benefits see a smaller real increase in income compared to those in jobs
- Taxes: regressive taxes mean that those with lower incomes bear a larger burden of the tax
- Health issues: can make it hard to get a job
- Conflict: destruction of factors of production or infrastructure
- Corruption: government spending, leaders might keep most of the wealth
- Natural disasters: floods and earthquakes can destroy FoP/infrastructure, such as the Nepal earthquake in 2015 pushing people into poverty
- Lack of resource or factors of production
What are the effects of poverty?
- Lower life expectancies, poorer standards of health, underdeveloped infants caused by malnutrition, decreasing future productivity
- Decreased standards of living: poor housing, crime, social unrest, mental health issues, poor sanitation
- Unemployment trap: some unemployed may choose not to work as wages may be lower than benefits, leading to hysteresis, causing a loss of labour and human capital
- Impact on government: budget deficit due to increased spending on benefits, decreased tax revenue, creating an opportunity cost of spending on debt servicing
- Pressure on public institutions: such as police/legal systems due to increased crime rate, and NHS/health systems, as people cannot afford to look after themselves
What interventionist policies can influence the distribution of income and wealth and alleviate poverty?
- Progressive taxes, such as higher rates of income tax for the richest earners
- Inheritance tax to redistribute wealth from the rich to the benefit of the poor
Revenue gained can be used for: - Welfare payments, which could lessen the incentive to work, but increasing the minimum wage could fix this, while decreasing poverty
- Subsidies to decrease the cost of living, such as energy
- Fund education and heath systems to improve quality of human capital and increase productivity
What are the problems of interventionist policies aiming to influence the distribution of income and wealth and alleviate poverty?
- Increasing taxation could disincentivise work, or lead to more tax avoidance or evasion, resulting in a net loss of tax revenue
- Revenue gained must be used effectively to result in the intended consequences
- A new minimum wage can create unemployment of Qs - Qd
What are the economic consequences of interventionist policies influencing the distribution of income and wealth and alleviating poverty?
- Improving budget deficit with increased tax revenue
- Increased employment and short and long run growth from investment
What free market policies can influence the distribution of income and wealth and alleviate poverty?
- Trickle down effect, meaning that eventually wealth from the rich will benefit the poor, leading to the multiplier and acceleration processes, but can be ineffective
- Poor infrastructure may incentivise some to work for improvement
What are the problems of free market policies aiming to influence the distribution of income and wealth and alleviate poverty?
There is a lack of will to solve the problem by relying on the trickle down effect, as no effort is made to solve a significant issue.
What are the economic consequences of free market policies aiming to influence the distribution of income and wealth and alleviate poverty?
If work is incentivised, growth could occur, but this is unlikely.