4. Narrative identity Flashcards
Defining narrative identity
- Third and Broadest level of personality outlined by McAdams (1996)
- Level of personality that captures how an individual defines themselves through the social construction of a coherent and purposeful life story
McAdams’ Critique of Trait Theories
- “But as an integrative framework for studying persons, the Big Five may not be comprehensive enough, for it makes the whole of personality to be synonymous with traits.”
(McAdams, 1996, p.296).
- Traits DO NOT = how adults explain their individuality
- Traits DO NOT = grounded in a cultural or sociohistorical context
- McAdams’ theory is based on these assumptions:
○ Selfhood is not given, it is made
○ The self develops over time
○ People seek temporal coherence in their self
McAdams’s Integrative Theory of Personality
○ Level 1 - Traits (e.g., FFM)
○ Level 2 - Personal concerns
○ Level 3 - Narrative Identity
Level 1 - Traits (e.g., FFM)
§ FFM: OCEAN
§ Dispositional signatures of personality
§ Decontextualised - (fairly) stable across lifespan and situations
Level 2 - Personal concerns
§ Motives, values, goals, beliefs, skills, coping styles, defence mechanisms, attachment styles …etc
§ It draws upon many areas of psychology where there are individual differences between people
§ Involves focus on motivation, self-development, and strategies or skills
§ Contextualised within a specific time, place and/or role
Level 3 - Narrative Identity
§ McAdams and McLean (2013)
□ The life story that is constructed from autobiographical memory
□ An evolving, integrative account, which provides temporal coherence and meaning
□ Answer to ‘Who am I?’ question
MEASURING NARRATIVE IDENTITY
Life story interview
- Method used to collect data on narrative identity
- It positions the participant as a storyteller
○ In depth qualitative interview, normally 2-3 hours
○ Person divides their life story into distinct chapters
Person describes key scenes, characters and plots and significance of the event(s) in each chapter
Written (Abbreviated) Life story
- LSI is a labour intensive method
- Researchers sometimes collect written narratives of key life scenes using similar instructions to the interviews
- Narratives do not assess the truth of event(s), rather it is individual differences in the interpretation of event(s) that is important
- There is often not a constraint on the retrospective time frame for narrative recall, rather a focus on subjectively meaningful scenes
Coding the life story interview
- Each life story is unique, but researchers can code for common dimensions and examine how these narrative dimensions related to variables of interest (McAdams & McLean, 2013)
Agency
Communion
Redemption
Contamination
Meaning making
Inter-Rater Reliability
- Narrative identity researchers code qualitative data for the purpose of statistical analyses
- Agreement and consistency in the interpretation of the narrative data is important:
1. Defined coding schemes
2. Training with example narratives
3. Multiple coders, often bind to study hypothesis
4. Inter-rater reliability statistics to examine the consistency and agreement cross coders
- Agreement and consistency in the interpretation of the narrative data is important:
The importance of Narrative Identity
- Narrative identity is not just a bunch of random stories
- For narrative identity to be a level of personality, then it should predict important life outcomes
- Researchers have often focused on health and well-being outcomes
Narrative identity –> Unity, purpose & meaning –> well-being
- McAdams et al (2001)
Redemption
- 2 samples in different life stages
○ 74 mid-life adults - completed Life Story Interview (LSI)
125 UG students - written LSI for 10 life scenes- Researchers coded for redemption and contamination in life scenes
for mid-life sample correlations between redemption and satisfaction with life, redemption and depression AND contamination and SWL , Contamination and Depression
Undergraduate sample found Significant correlation redemption and SWL and redemption and psychological well-being
Alder et al 2015 longitudinal study
is narrative identity style of health challenges associated with well-being over time?
89 late-mid-life participants were sampled from a study that included the Life Story Interview
Mental and physical health were assessed 5 times (once a year for 4 years post-baseline)
4 life scenes selected: high point, low point, personal health challenge and turning point
Agency and redemption: positive trajectory to Mental Health
Contamination: negative trajectory to Mental health
A & R positive traject for low point and health challenge compared to neg traject for contamination
Low point neg for PH contamination
Alder et al 2015 study 2
Illness group
+ Traject for Agency, communion and redemption
- Traject for contamination
No significant changes in physical or mental health over time