4. Freehold Covenants Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Is a covenant capable of being legal?

A

Covenants are not capable of being legal interests in land. They are not listed in s 1(2) LPA 1925 and are therefore equitable by nature – s 1(3) LPA 1925.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Formalities for creating a valid equitable covenant

A

Signed writing (possible to create by contract) but tend to be created by deed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Does the burden of the covenant pass at common law?

A

NO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Liability of original parties to the covenant

A

The original covenantor remains bound by the covenant even after they have sold the land due to privity of contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When does the burden of a covenant pass in equity?

A

Doctrine in Tulk v Moxhay:
1. Covenant is restrictive
2. Benefits dominant land retained by covenantee (at the time of creation)
3. touches and concerns the land
4. made with the intention of binding the servient land (express or implied)
5. Owner of servient land has notice of the covenant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How can positive covenants be indirectly enforced?

A
  1. Creating a lease
  2. Indemnity Covenant
  3. Doctrine of mutual benefit and burden (Halsall v Brizzell)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Requirements for Halsall v Brizell to apply

A

i. Burden is clearly linked to the benefit
ii. covenantor’s successors in title must have chance to elect or renounce it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Running of the Benefit at Common Law: When will it run to a successor?

A

If there is
1. Express Assignment
2. Automatically (with conditions)
i. Cov. touches and concerns land
ii. Original covenantee and person now seeking to enforce must have a legal estate in land
iii. Original parties must intend benefit of the covenant is to run with the land (ie. clear from deed)
- Either Expressly (in deed)
- Or Implied (under s 78 LPA 1925) applies to covenants created after 1925

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Running of the Benefit in Equity: When will it run?

A
  1. Covenant touches and concerns land and
  2. Benefit passes by express assignment or by annexation
    i. Express Assignment
    - Giving written notice to the person with the burden of the covenant, signed by assignor (original covenantee eg)
    ii. Annexation
    - Express (written into deed etc.)
    - or implied under statute
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Matching the Benefit and Burden Principle: what is required to do this?

A
  • If individual wants to use this rule, they must prove they have the benefit in equity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Potential Remedies for breaches of Covenant: Positive Covenant

A
  1. Damages (contractual, common law)
  2. Specific Performance (against original covenantor only)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Remedies for breaches of restrictive covenants

A
  1. Injunction
    - This is an equitable remedy, equitable maxims apply (ie. delay defeats equity, clean hands)
  2. Damages in lieu of injunction at the court’s discretion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How to modify or discharge a covenant

A
  1. Extinguish covenant with common ownership
  2. Lands Chamber of Upper Tribunal
  3. Negotiate a release
  4. Insurance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly