2. Co-Ownership and Trusts Flashcards

1
Q

DEF: Co-Ownership

A

Co- ownership is where more than one person owns land at the same time (ie concurrently).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When does a ‘trust of land’ arise?

A

A trust of land will
arise in the following situations:
1. a landowner intentionally sets up a trust of their land by transferring title to the land to trustees for the benefit of others (an express trust following the formalities in s 53 LPA 1925);
2. a person acquires an interest in land owned by another due to their conduct (an implied trust – see 2.4); or
3. land is acquired by more than one owner jointly (co- ownership).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How must the legal estate be held?

A

The legal estate must be held as a joint tenancy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Can the joint tenancy of the legal estate be severed?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who can be a trustee of land?

A

Anyone over the age of 18 (s 1(6) LPA 1925)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

If someone tried to convey a legal estate to a minor, what would happen?

A

This would be a declaration of trust that the land is HELD for the minor. If the land was conveyed to a minor AND adult, the land would be vested in the adult and in trust for the minor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How many trustees can there be (min/max) for a trust of land?

A

Maximum of four trustees. If there are more than 4, first 4 named adults will be the trustees. There is no minimum (best to have atleast 2 for overreaching purposes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

As a trustee over land, what can trustees do with the land?

A
  • Anything an absolute owner could (ie sell or mortgage or purchase)
  • This is limited by their duty to consult beneficiaries who are of full age with an interest in possession
  • Must comply as far as is practicable
  • If beneficiaries not in agreement, must comply with the majority wishes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Two forms of Co-Ownership

A

(1) Joint tenancy
(2) Tenancy in common

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How can the equitable interest of a property be held?

A

Either joint tenancy or tenancy in common

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

If one joint tenant dies, what will happen to their interest in the property?

A

The right of survivorship: their interest passes to surviving joint tenant(s)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

DEF: Undifferentiated Ownership

A

Joint tenants are jointly entitled to the whole of the property (no such things as shares)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

DEF: Severance

A

Converting a joint tenancy in equity to a tenancy in common (can never be done for legal estate)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

If one tenant in common dies, what will happen to their interest in the property?

A

There is no right of survivorship, their share passes with their estate by their will or the intestacy rules
- # of beneficial tenants in common can increase
- their shares can be unequal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

DEF: Undivided Shares

A

Each owner of the property (as tenants in common) has a distinct share in the land, but there is no physical division of the land to this effect
- share can be equal or unequal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How can we determine whether the property is held by joint tenancy or tenancy in common in equity?

A

Four Tests:
1) Are all four unities present?
(2) does the deed transferring the land to the co-owners contain an express declaration
(3) does the deed transferring the land to the co-owners contain words of severance?
(4) Does equity presume a tenancy in common?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

DEF: Four unities test

A

If all four unities are present, it is likely there is a joint tenancy in equity:
(1) Unity of Possession
(2) Unity of Interest
(3) Unity of Title
(4) Unity of Time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

DEF: Unity of Possession (four unities test)

A

There will be unity of possession if each co-owner has the RIGHT to possession of all the land.
- Actual possession not required
- This unity required for both joint tenancy and tenancy in common in equity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

DEF: Unity of Interest

A

each co- owner must have identical rights over the land. This is the hallmark of a joint tenancy. A tenancy in common can have unequal shares and,
therefore, no unity of interest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

DEF: Unity of Title

A

each co- owner must have acquired their interest from the same document. For example, the same transfer or conveyance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

DEF: Unity of Time

A

The co-owners receive their interests at the same time

22
Q

If all four unities are present, what does this indicate about how the equitable interest is held? What next?

A

Can be either a joint tenancy or tenancy in common (necessary to consider next test)

23
Q

If only the first of the four unities are present - what does this indicate about how the equitable interest is held?

A

Joint tenancy

24
Q

Second Test: does the deed transferring the land to the co-owners contain an express declaration?

A

Express declarations of trust are conclusive (even if there are unequal contributions)
- transfer document sets out how property is to be held
- eg ‘transferred into their joint names and express beneficial joint tenants in equity’

25
Third Test: does the deed transferring the land to the co-owners contain words of severance?
Words of severance = any words that indicate co-owners are to have a distinct shares - 'i grant xyz to be divided equally between my children' - 'to A and B in equal shares' If none of this - need to do fourth test
26
Fourth Test: When does equity presume a tenancy in common?
(1) presumption that co-owners are joint tenants in equity (equity follows the law) (2) Rebut presumption if: i. property acquired for business use ii. unequal contributions to the purchase price (equity presumes tenancy in common) iii. Post-acquisition money management (eg. one person provides far greater share of finance for the home)
27
How can a joint tenancy be severed in equity?
(1) Written Notice (2) Alienation (acts operating on the joint tenant's share) (3) Mutual Agreement (4) Course of Dealing (5) Bankruptcy (6) Homicide (7) Post-acquisition money management
28
Requirements for severance by written notice to be effective
Notice need not be signed but: - must use appropriate wording expressing desire to end JT IMMEDIATELY - be received by all the other joint tenants or DEEMED to have been received (handed to recipient or posted)
29
JT trying to sever by written notice: sending by Registered Post
Notice seemed to be sufficiently served if not returned undelivered
30
JT trying to sever by written notice: sending by Ordinary Post
Sufficiently served if it is left at the last known place of abode or business in the UK of the person being served
31
DEF: Severance by Alienation
This is a unilateral act - JT disposes of their interest by sale, gift, lease or mortgage - Complies with rules in s 53(1) LPA 1925 (be in writing and signed) - Could also be a contract provided it complies with s2 LPMPA 1989 and can be specifically enforceable - Can dispose of interest to stranger or joint tenant
32
DEF: Severance by mutual agreement
This requires the joint tenants to act together (either expressly or by implication) to sever the joint tenancy in equity or where the parties agree to deal with the land in a certain way and that method of dealing would have the effect of severing. An oral agreement will suffice and the agreement does NOT need to be carried through to performance. The significance of the agreement is not that it binds the parties, but that it expresses an intention to sever the joint tenancy.
33
DEF: Severance by mutual conduct / course of dealing
The joint tenants do not have to agree to do something to sever, but must show through their conduct (in relation to the land and each other) that they clearly regard themselves as owning distinct shares.The parties must behave in a way that shows they assume they are tenants in common over a significant period of time
34
DEF: Severance by Bankruptcy
(involuntary alienation) - assigns equitable interest to joint tenant's trustee in bankruptcy - Once bankruptcy discharged, equitable interest reverts to the co-owner who will continue to hold it as tenant in common
35
DEF: Severance by Homicide
If one joint tenant unlawfully kills another, the right of survivorship should not apply
36
DEF: Severance by post-acquisition money management
If no express declaration of beneficial interest for joint tenants (1) starting point: equity follows the law (2)Rebutted if common intention as to shares are different at the time of acquisition or later, can be deduced objectively by conduct, court will decide what is fair wrt whole course of dealings - 'ambulatory constructive trust'
37
Effect of severance where there are two joint tenants
Both become tenants in common in equal shares
38
Effect of severance where there are more than two joint tenants
The co-owner who severs becomes a tenant in common, the others remain joint tenants (shares proportionate to number of joint tenants) - If severance occurs, co-owners contributions to purchase price are irrelevant
39
When do resulting trusts arise
(1) a person (not holding legal title to the property) makes a contribution to the purchase price (2) no evidence that contribution was intended as a gift or a loan and (3) contribution is all or part of purchase price at date of acquisition (not subsequent) - Person holds a beneficial interest in the property
40
Two ways a constructive trust can be created
(1) Agreement + Detrimental Reliance (2) conduct + direct financial contribution
41
DEF: Detrimental Reliance
Reliance on the agreement to their detriment or significant alteration of position - must be solely related to the agreement not other motives (ie. love and affection)
42
CICT: If there is no agreement, how can a common intention be established
By conduct: - payment towards purchase price initially OR - payment of mortgage payments by non-owning party (anything less than direct financial contributions are insufficient)
43
Requirements for Co-owned land to be sold
All trustees need to execute the deed transferring the legal estate
44
What can a co-owner do if they want to sell the property but the other co-owners do not?
Apply to court for an order under s 14 TLATA Court has wide discretion to make an order: a. relating to the exercise by the trustees of any of their functions; or b. declaring the nature or extent of the person's interest in property
45
Examples of disputes which fall under s 14 TLATA
a. disputes about the size of co-ownership interests b. disputes regarding occupation of the land c. authorising transactions without the consent of all trustees
46
What factors does the court need to consider when making an order under s 14 TLATA?
s 15: a. intentions of the person / persons who created the trust b. purposes for which property is held c. welfare of any minor occupants (or those who might reasonably expected to occupy) d. Interests of any secured credit of any beneficiary AND e. wishes of beneficiaries entitled to an interest in possession in property subject to trust or of the majority
47
What potential orders could the court make under s 14 TLATA?
1. Refuse a sale 2. Order a sale 3. refuse a sale but make an order regulating the right to occupy the property 4. Exceptional cases: partition the co-owned property
48
When would the court order to refuse a sale under s 14 TLATA in a co-ownership dispute?
If the purpose of acquisition can still be fulfilled
49
When would the court order to order a sale under s 14 TLATA in a co-ownership dispute?
If purposes for which property has been acquired have failed (eg. failed business)
50
When would the court order to refuse a sale but make an order regulating the right to occupy the property under s 14 TLATA in a co-ownership dispute?
Where a relationship has broken down as a consequence of one partner's violence towards another - May order occupying spouse to pay rent to the person who has been excluded from occupation by the violence (VERY RARE)
51
If four individuals purchase land with the intention of running a business from such land - how are the legal / equitable interests held?
1. Legal held as JT 2. Equitable held as TiC