4. Evaluation: for e.g., the ‘Good Nazi’? Flashcards

1
Q

what were Speer’s action impact?

A

oblivious to them or not, were destructive nationally as well as internationally.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what did he explain at trial?

A

explained that he tried to maximize Germany’s war potential, but not criminal act as same as others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

his argument at trial was that?

A

procurement of labor was none of his business and made no enquiries about how it was done, denied responsibility for conditions of workers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what did Soviet prosecutor believe?

A

Soviet prosecutor not happy, argued he knew how foreign labourers obtained and that he was responsible for abduction of millions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

American prosecutors POV?

A

American prosecutor, Justice Robert Jackson stated atleast Speer stopped ‘scorched earth’ policy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what kind of suspicions existed about his actions in trial?

A

Suspicions that Speer made deal to spare his life with American prosecutor (cross examination done by him)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

sentenced to how many years in prison?

A

20

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Taking a negative stance towards Speer’s character, it is evident that?

A

that even if he did not know about the ‘final solution’, his detrimental actions led to more deaths through his forced labour, affecting the world on a global scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Historiography: Schmidt view?

A

represents Speer as ambitious and career driven. He argues that Speer altered his character and ‘story’ in order to suit his situation. He was more of a ‘skilled manipulator’ who was focused on self-gain.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Historiography: Van der Vat?

A

extremely critical of Speer
argues that his infatuation with personal success led him to manipulate the representation of himself post-war.
He was well aware of his position of guilt and operated as ‘ignorant’ as a means of survival

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Historiography: Galbraith?

A

drew the conclusion that even before Nuremberg, Speer “was a very intelligent escapist from the truth”. According to Galbraith, this is when the myth of Speer as the apolitical technocrat first developed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Historiography: Bullock?

A

praise Speer’s performance at the Nuremberg Trials and were convinced that Speer had told the truth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Historiography: British academic Trevor-Roper describes him as?

A

the ‘penitent Nazi’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly