4. Evaluation: for e.g., the ‘Good Nazi’? Flashcards
what were Speer’s action impact?
oblivious to them or not, were destructive nationally as well as internationally.
what did he explain at trial?
explained that he tried to maximize Germany’s war potential, but not criminal act as same as others
his argument at trial was that?
procurement of labor was none of his business and made no enquiries about how it was done, denied responsibility for conditions of workers
what did Soviet prosecutor believe?
Soviet prosecutor not happy, argued he knew how foreign labourers obtained and that he was responsible for abduction of millions
American prosecutors POV?
American prosecutor, Justice Robert Jackson stated atleast Speer stopped ‘scorched earth’ policy
what kind of suspicions existed about his actions in trial?
Suspicions that Speer made deal to spare his life with American prosecutor (cross examination done by him)
sentenced to how many years in prison?
20
Taking a negative stance towards Speer’s character, it is evident that?
that even if he did not know about the ‘final solution’, his detrimental actions led to more deaths through his forced labour, affecting the world on a global scale
Historiography: Schmidt view?
represents Speer as ambitious and career driven. He argues that Speer altered his character and ‘story’ in order to suit his situation. He was more of a ‘skilled manipulator’ who was focused on self-gain.
Historiography: Van der Vat?
extremely critical of Speer
argues that his infatuation with personal success led him to manipulate the representation of himself post-war.
He was well aware of his position of guilt and operated as ‘ignorant’ as a means of survival
Historiography: Galbraith?
drew the conclusion that even before Nuremberg, Speer “was a very intelligent escapist from the truth”. According to Galbraith, this is when the myth of Speer as the apolitical technocrat first developed
Historiography: Bullock?
praise Speer’s performance at the Nuremberg Trials and were convinced that Speer had told the truth
Historiography: British academic Trevor-Roper describes him as?
the ‘penitent Nazi’