4. Equity Finance Flashcards
Def: Allotment
A company creates shares and gives them to existing shareholders or new shareholders in return for payment (company then issues a share certificate and enters this person on the register of members)
Def: Share transfer
The shareholder sells or gives shares to another shareholder or a new shareholder
Def: share buyback
Company buys back some of its own shares from one or more shareholders (reverse of allotment), company ‘reabsorbs some of its shares so the total number of shares decreases
When does ‘allotment’ occur? When does ‘issue’ occur?
- This will be when the shares have been transferred and paid for and the board has passed a resolution to register the transfer.
- The shares are issued by the company when the name of the shareholder has been entered on the register of members
Three key questions to ask when allotting
- Are there any constitutional restrictions on allotment?
- Do the directors have authority to allot shares?
- Are there any pre-emption rights
Do the directors have authority to allot shares: private companies with one class of share
The directors of a private company which has one class of shares both before and after the allotment have authority to allot shares without the permission of the shareholders under s 550 CA 2006, as long as the company was incorporated under the CA 2006. (board resolution)
UNLESS: If the company was incorporated before CA 2006 came into force, the shareholders must pass an ordinary resolution so ‘activate’ s 550
Do the directors have authority to allot: Private Company with more than one class of share / public company
s 55: The directors of public companies, or private companies with more than one class of shares before or after the allotment, must obtain the permission of the company’s shareholders before they can allot shares. (by ordinary resolution)
What key information must be contained on the shareholder’s resolution to authorise allotment?
- maximum number the directors may allot
- date when authority will expire
- this cannot be more than 5 years from the date of the resolution
Filing requirements for s 551 ordinary resolution to authorise alotment
The ordinary resolution MUST BE FILED at CH
Def: Pre-emption rights
Under s 561 the company may not allot ‘equity securities’ to a person unless it has first offered them to existing ordinary shareholders in the company on the same or more favourable terms - must offer to shareholders in the proportion that would enable them to maintain their shareholding %
Pre-emption rights: when a company makes the initial shareholder offer - does this expire?
Offer must state period for acceptance (deadline) and offer must now be withdrawn within that period (period cannot be less than 14 days)
When do existing pre-emption rights NOT APPLY
- In relation to allotment of bonus shares
- if consideration for allotment is wholly or partly non cash
- if shares are to be held under or transferred pursuant to an employee share scheme
How to disapply pre-emption rights in a private company with one class of share?
Under s 569 CA 2006, the shareholders of a private company which has only one class of shares may pass a special resolution disapplying the existing shareholders’ pre- emption rights. So companies which had authority to allot shares under s 550 can disapply any preemption rights by special resolution under s 569.
Disapplying pre-emption rights for public companies / private companies with more than 1 class of share?
Companies which do not have automatic authority to allot under s 550 will need to pass an ordinary resolution under s 551 to give directors authority. If the ordinary resolution gives a ‘general’ authority to allot then s 570 allows companies to remove pre-emption rights by special resolution and this disapplication lasts as long as the directors’ authority under s 551
- If authority in s 551 ordinary resolution for allotment is about a specific allotment, s 571 allows companies to disapply pre-emption rights by special resolution but this must be recommended by the directors of the company before proposing the SR
When would a company have a constitutional restriction on share allotment? What can be done about such a restriction?
- Companies incorporated before October 2009 had a ceiling on number of shares in their memorandum - CA 2006 transferred this clause to company articles - removed by ordinary res.
- Companies incorporated after 2009 may have a restriction in their articles if they’ve put it in - removed by special res
Can a company issue shares ‘partly paid’ - what would be the consequences of this?
Yes, if they exclude MA 21 from their articles
- shareholder would have to ‘pay up’ these shares if the company were wound up
Forms which may need to be sent to companies house after an allotment
- Return of allotment and statement of capital SH01 (within 1 month)
- possibly PSC forms if allotment has made changes in share distributions to this affect
Entries a company must make in its own registers after allotment of shares
- Amend register of members within 2 months
- Amend PSC register if necessary
Share Allotment: Which resolutions must be sent to companies house and within what time
- Within 15 days
- Special resolutions, ordinary resolutions removing ASC clause, Ord resolution to activate s 550 in pre-CA 2006 company, any s 551 ordinary res. granting directors authority to allot
Share Allotment: When must share certificates be allocated?
Within 2 months of the allotment
Does anything in CA 2006 place a restriction on share transfer? Are there any pre-emption obligations?
- No and No
Restrictions on share transfers: where would they be found and what could they be?
- In Company’s articles placing restrictions on who can be offered shares
- Cannot prevent someone from selling / someone else from buying but the board has discretion to refuse to register the new owner under MA 26 - so board approval needed
Share Transfer: What happens if the new owner is never entered on the register of members
They are the beneficial owner only
- transferor attends GMs for them and receives dividends for them (must vote in B’s interests)