3. Directors Flashcards
Director’s Duty to promote success of the company: key considerations
Directors must have regard to (a) the likely consequences of any decision in the longterm, (b) interests of company employees, (c) need to foster company’s business relationships, (d) impact of company operations on community and environment (e) desirability of company maintaining reputation for high standards of business conduct (f) need to act fairly between members of the company
Test for breach of s 172 CA 2006
- Subjective test applied by court when assessing breach (will not be in breach if they considered in good faith that their actions would promote company success) (Re Smith v Fawcett 1942), difficult to establish the director is in breach here
- If director acted dishonestly (clear they have not considered s 172), court can apply objective test (use board meeting minutes as evidence)
Potential defences to s 173: Duty to exercise independent judgement
- If this behaviour is authorised by the company’s constitution
s 174 CA 2006 Duty to exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence: how is the level of RC,S, and D measured?
- the general knowledge, skill and experience that may reasonably be expected of a person carrying out the functions carried out by the director in relation to the company (objective test), and
- the general knowledge, skill and experience that the director has (subjective test)
s 175 CA 2006: Duty to avoid conflicts of interest, when does this NOT APPLY
Does not apply in relation to conflicts of interest arising in relation to a transaction or arrangement with the company
Can the same action give rise to breach in s 175 and s 177
No - 175 does not apply to company transactions while 177 does
Can a breach of 175 CA 2006 be AUTHORISED by the other directors?
Yes (s 175(4) and (5))
If a board meeting is held to decide whether to authorise a director’s breach of s 175, can the director in breach vote?
No, and will not count in quorum (EVEN IF MA 14 HAS BEEN EXCLUDED)
Defences to s 175 CA 2006
- Situation cannot reasonably be regarded as likely to give rise to a conflict of interest
- The matter has been authorised by the directors
s 176 CA 2006: Director’s Duty
Directors have a duty not to accept benefits form third parties (because of his status as director or actions or inaction in relation to his role)
s 177 CA 2006: Duty
Duty to declare interest in a proposed transaction or arrangement
Ways to defend / avoid a s 176 claim:
- If the benefit cannot reasonably be expected to give rise to a conflict of interest
Methods of declaring interest under s 177
- At a board meeting
- General notice in writing to the other directors
Exceptions to s 177
a. If the director is not aware of the interest, or of the transaction or arrangement in question (and a director is treated as being aware of matters of which he ought reasonably to be aware)
b. if the interest cannot reasonably be regarded as likely to give rise to a conflict of interest
c. if, or to the extent that, the other directors are already aware of it (or ought reasonably to be)
d. if it concerns the terms of the director’s service contract
Difference between s 177 and s 182 duties
177: Regards transactions which are UPCOMING
182: Regards transactions which are CURRENT
Failure to comply with s 177: consequences
Civil penalties
Consequences of failure to comply with s 182
Criminal offence punishable by fine
Who has the power to appoint a director?
(1) Directors (under MA 17)
or shareholders
Essential inclusions in notice of board meetings
- Reasonable (time)
- Include date, time and place of meting
- state method of communication if not in person
4, sent to all directors
Must notice for a board meeting be communicated in writing?
No, but any other mean must meet the ‘reasonableness’ requirement
Quorum at Board Meetings
Generally, 2 (for meeting to be quorate)
Two ways companies raise capital
- Borrowing
- Issuing Shares