4-3 Risk oriented audit planning Flashcards

1
Q

Three reasons for audit planning:

A

– enable the auditor to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence for the circumstances to minimize legal liability and maintain a good reputation

– help to keep audit costs reasonable

– avoid misunderstandings with the client, e.g., scope of the service

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Acceptable and inherent audit risk

A
  • Acceptable audit risk and inherent risk significantly influence the conduct and cost of audits: Much of the early planning of audits deals with obtaining information to assess these risks
  • Acceptable audit risk: Measure of how willing the auditor is to accept that the financial statements may be materially misstated after the audit is completed and an unqualified opinion has been issued
    • Lower acceptable audit risk means that the auditor wants to be more certain that the financial statements are not materially misstated
  • Inherent risk: Measure of the auditor’s assessment of the likelihood that there are material misstatements in an account balance before considering the effectiveness of internal control
  • Acceptable audit risk and inherent risk help determine the amount of evidence that will need to be accumulated and the experience level of staff assigned to the engagement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The first four steps in the planning phase…

A
  1. Accept client and perform initial planning
  2. Understand the client’s business and industry
  3. Assess client business risk
  4. Perform preliminary analytical procedures

…have significant influence on the execution and the costs of the audit. The planning phase helps the auditor to assess the acceptable audit risk and the inherent risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Accept Client and Perform Initial Audit Planning

A

New client investigation

– Communication with predecessor auditor (required by auditing standards):

permission from the client needed

– Investigations by gathering information from local attorneys or other businesses

Continuing clients

– Annual review

– Long-term risk of the audit > short-term benefits? Drop the client

Identify client’s reasons for audit: Likely statement users and intended use of the statement

  • Obtain an understanding with the client: Engagement letter
  • Develop overall audit strategy

– Select staff for engagement

– Evaluate need for outside specialists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Accept Client and Perform Initial Audit Planning – Engagement Letter (I/III)

A
  • Goal: Understanding of the terms of the engagement between the client and the audit firm
  • Content and form of the engagement letter may vary; possible contents are:

– Engagement’s objectives and information that the auditor cannot guarantee that all acts of fraud will be discovered

– Responsibilities of the auditor and management

– Identification of the financial reporting framework used

– Reference to the expected form and content of the audit report

– Engagement’s limitations

– Agreement to provide other services, e.g., management consulting

– Restrictions to be imposed on the auditor’s work, e.g., deadlines for completing the audit

– Agreement on fees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Understand the Client’s Business and Industry (I/II)

A

The Auditor identifies and assesses risks of material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, based on an understanding of the entity and its environment, including the entity’s internal control.

  • Understand the impact of major economic downturns on the client’s financial statements and ability to continue as a going concern
  • Knowledge about major customers, suppliers and related risks
  • Global operations, e.g., through strategic alliances
  • Increased importance of intangible assets has increased accounting complexity and the importance of management judgments
  • ISA 315 – Identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement through understanding the entity and its environment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Understand the Client’s Business and Industry (II/II)

A
  • Industry and external environment

– Risks associated with specific industries may affect the assessment of client business risk and acceptable audit risk

– Inherent risks depending on industry

– Unique industry accounting requirements

  • Business operations and processes

– Tour client facilities and operations

– Identify related parties

  • Management and governance

– Code of ethics

– Minutes of meetings

  • Client objectives and strategies

– Reliability of financial reporting

– Effectiveness and efficiency of operations

– Compliance with laws and regulations

  • Measurement and performance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Assess Client Business Risk

A

The client business risk is the risk that the client will fail to achieve its objectives.

Understand Client’s Busniess and Industry

  • Industry and External Environment
  • Business Operations and Processes
  • Management and Governance
  • Objectives and Strategies
  • Measurement and Performance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

step 4: Perform Preliminary Analytical Procedures

A

Analytical procedures…

  • Are conducted in several phases of the audit process
  • Enhance the auditor’s understanding of the client’s business and assess client business risk
  • Reveal unusual changes as compared to prior years or industry average
  • Are used to assist in determining the nature, timing and extent of auditing procedures
  • Help the auditor identify areas that may represent specific risks of material misstatements
  • Often based on aggregate, company-wide data, i.e., key financial ratios such as:

– Short-term debt-paying ability, e.g., cash ratio

– Liquidity activity ratios, e.g., accounts receivable turnover

– Ability to meet long-term obligations, e.g., debt to equity

– Profitability ratios, e.g., profit margin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

step 4: Types of Audit Procedures ( tests)

A

Tests of controls:

  • Gain an understanding of internal controls
  • Assess effectiveness of internal controls

Substantive tests: Procedures designed to test for dollar misstatements that directly affect the correctness of financial statement balances

-Substantive tests of transactions: determine whether transaction-related audit objectives are satisfied

-Analytical procedures: comparisons of recorded amounts to expectations developed by the auditor

  • Evaluations of financial information through analysis of plausible relationships among financial and nonfinancial data
  • Use comparisons and relationships to assess whether account balances or other data appear reasonable compared to the auditor’s expectations
  • Analysis of significant key figures and trends
  • Analytical procedures range from simple comparisons to complex
  • calculations and comprehensive analyses of own or competitor data
  • Furthermore, analytical procedures comprise the evaluation of unexpected deviations

-Tests of details of balances :

− Focus on the monetary correctness of the ending general ledger

balances for balances sheet and income statement accounts

− Evidence usually obtained from a source independent of the client

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Analytical Procedures – Important Hints Regarding Application (I/III)

  • risk of analytical procedures and 4 aspects to reduce it
A

The most important risk of analytical procedures lies in the conclusion that an account is represented correctly although there are actually material misstatements.

In order to reduce this risk, one has to consider the following aspects:

  1. Relevance of the information
  2. Calculability of data
  3. Explanation for unexpected or missing changes/deviances
  4. Reliability of data
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Analytical Procedures – Important Hints Regarding Application (II/III)

  • Relevance of information:
  • Calculability of data:
  • Explanation of unexpected or missing changes/deviances:
A

Relevance of information:

  • It is not reasonable to compare very different/heterogeneous data (e.g.different branches)
  • It is not reasonable to use unreliable, non-comparable branch data based on different accounting standards
  • Possibly considerable rises in prices
  • A comparison between actual and target state is only feasible with well-controlled budgeting and financial planning

Calculability of data:

Predict expected results

Explanation of unexpected or missing changes/deviances:

Depends on materiality and the impact on the conclusions. A missing change/deviance does not automatically imply that the account is appropriate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Analytical Procedures – Important Hints Regarding Application (III/III)

-reliability of data

A

• Reliability of data: The data reliability may be assessed by considering a sample:

– E.g.: Regarding write-downs of receivables the age structure of debitors is taken into account. Thus, the age structure has to be assessed by a sample in order to have a reliable data base

• Reliability of data is influenced by:
– Independence of the source
– Independence of the person in charge from the source

– Well-controlled accounting function

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Definition of Materiality

A

The magnitude of an omission or misstatement of accounting information that, in the light of surrounding circumstances, makes it probable that the judgment of a reasonable person relying on the information would have been changed or influenced by the omission or misstatement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Materiality and Audit Risk

A

In conducting an audit of financial statements, the overall objectives of the auditor are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, thereby enabling the auditor to express an opinion on whether the financial statements are prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with an applicable financial reporting framework; and to report on the financial statements, and communicate as required by the ISAs, in accordance with the auditor’s findings.The auditor obtains reasonable assurance by obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence to reduce audit risk to an acceptably low level.Audit risk is the risk that the auditor expresses an inappropriate audit opinion when the financial statements are materially misstated.

Audit risk is a function of the risks of material misstatement and detection risk. Materiality and audit risk are considered throughout the audit, in particular, when:

a) Identifying and assessing the risk of material misstatement;
b) Determining the nature, timing and extent of further audit procedures; and
c) Evaluating the effect of uncorrected misstatements, if any, on the financial statements and in forming the opinion in the auditor’s report.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Determinants of Materiality

A

General aspects

  • There are no exact rules how to determine materiality
  • Audit firms have developed quantitative guides for implementation
  • Professional organizations try to standardize guides
  • How should quantitative factors be taken into account?

Determinants of materiality

  • The relative importance of numbers are more important than absolute numbers
  • Comparison of several periods
  • Determinants set by law
  • Qualitative aspects
  • Accumulation of immaterial misstatements

Conclusion

  • No one correct method to determine materiality
  • Keep the users of the financial statements in mind
  • What will the users tolerate?
  • Qualitative vs. quantitative factors
17
Q

5 Steps in Applying Materiality

A

Step 1: Set materiality for the financial statements as a whole

Step 2: Determine performance materiality

Step 3: Estimate total misstatement in segment

Step 4: Estimate the combined misstatement

Step 5: Compare combined estimate with preliminary or revised judgment about materiality

The first two steps are conducted in the planning phase of the audit process. Step 3 is conducted during the entire audit process and the last two steps are performed during phase IV of the audit process.

18
Q

Steps in Applying Materiality

Step 1: Set materiality for the financial statements as a whole

A
  • The preliminary judgment about materiality is the maximum amount by which the auditor believes the statements could be misstated and still not affect the decisions of reasonable users. Conceptually, this is an amount that is marginally lower than the materiality defined by the FASB.
  • Materiality may for instance be quantified based on:
  • Percentage of total revenues
  • Percentage of net earnings before taxes (EBIT)
  • Percentage of total assets
  • Percentage of current operating assets
  • Percentage of current debt
  • Percentage of equity
19
Q

Steps in Applying Materiality

Step 2: Determine performance materiality

A

Definition:

For purposes of the ISAs, performance materiality means the amount or amounts set by the auditor at less than materiality for the financial statements as a whole to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds materiality for the financial statements as a whole. If applicable, performance materiality also refers to the amount or amounts set by the auditor at less than the materiality level or levels for particular classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures.

20
Q

Steps in Applying Materiality

Step 2: Determine performance materiality - common 3 issues

A

The following three issues are common in this step:

  • Auditors expect certain accounts to have more misstatements than others
  • Both overstatements and understatements must be considered
  • Relative audit costs affect the allocation

Misstatement and materiality:

  • Materiality limit may not be fully used for all accounts Net effect of overstatements vs. understatements
21
Q

Steps in Applying Materiality

Step 5: Compare combined estimate with preliminary or revised judgment about materiality

A

Comparison between actual and target state:

Combined estimate about misstatement > Preliminary judgment about materiality (Step 1)

–> The financial statements cannot be accepted

22
Q

Risk-oriented Audit and Audit Risk Model

  • inherent risk
  • control risk
A
  • The inherent risk (IR) measures the auditor’s assessment of the susceptibility of an assertion to material misstatements, before considering the effectiveness of related internal controls

– If the auditor concludes that a high likelihood of misstatement exists, the auditor will conclude that inherent risk is high

– Internal controls are ignored in setting inherent risk because they are considered separately in the audit risk model as control risk

  • The control risk (CR) measures the auditor’s assessment of the risk that a material misstatement could occur in an assertion and not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by the client’s internal controls. Control risks are understood as risks that arise from weaknesses or failures of internal control methods
23
Q

Risk-oriented Audit and Audit Risk Model

  • detection risk DR
  • acceptable audit risk AAR
A
  • The detection risk (DR) is the likelihood that audit evidence for a segment will fail to detect misstatements exceeding the tolerable misstatement
  • The acceptable audit risk (AAR) is a measure of how willing the auditor is to accept that the financial statements may be materially misstated after the audit is completed and an unqualified opinion has been issued. The audit risk (AR) as such cannot be calculated in an isolated manner, but is a combination of risks (i.e., inherent risk, control risk, and detection risk)
24
Q

The Relationship Between the Risks

A
25
Q

Risk-oriented Audit and Audit Risk Model

( formula)

A