10_Introduction to Internal Auditing Flashcards
Relationship External – Internal Auditing:
Using the Work of Internal Auditors: The objectives
The objectives of the external auditor, where the external auditor expects to use the work of the function or to use internal auditors to provide direct assistance, are:
– To determine whether the work of the internal audit function or direct assistance from internal auditors can be used, and if so, in which areas and to what extent
– To determine whether that work is adequate for purposes of the audit
– If using internal auditors to provide direct assistance, to appropriately direct,
supervise and review their work
Relationship External – Internal Auditing:
Using the Work of Internal Auditors: external auditors responsibility for the audit (610.11)
– The external auditor has sole responsibility for the audit opinion expressed. That responsibility is not reduced by the external auditor’s use of the work of the internal audit function or internal auditors to provide direct assistance
– Neither the internal audit function nor the internal auditors are independent of the entity as is required of the external auditor in an audit of financial statements
Relationship between internal auditing and the external auditor (610.A4)
• Evaluating Internal Auditing
– The external auditor determines whether the work of internal auditing can be used for purposes of the audit (610.15)
Thus, he has to evaluate the following:
- Organizational status and relevant policies and procedures that support the objectivity of the internal auditors
- The level of competence of the internal audit function
- Whether the internal audit function applies a systematic and disciplined approach, including
- quality control
• Determin_ing the nature and extent of work of internal auditing can be used_
– The external auditor considers the nature and scope of the work that has been performed, or is planned to be performed, and its relevance to the external auditor’s overall audit strategy and audit plan (610.17)
International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 610: Using the Work of Internal Auditors
• Using the work of internal auditing
– The external auditor discusses the planned use of internal auditing’s work with the function as a basis for coordinating their respective activities (610.21)
– The external auditor obtains an understanding of the nature and extent of audit procedures internal auditing performed and the related findings (610.22)
– The external auditor performs sufficient audit procedures on the work of internal auditing, to determine its adequacy for purposes of the audit, including: (610.23)
- Whether it had been properly planned, performed, supervised, reviewed and documented
- Sufficient appropriate evidence had been obtained
- Conclusions reached are appropriate and reports are consistent with the results
– The nature and extent of the external auditor’s audit procedures shall be responsive to the external auditor’s evaluation of: (610.24)
- The amount of judgment involved
- The assessed risk of material misstatement
- The extent to which the internal auditing’s organizational status and relevant policies and
- procedures support the objectivity of the internal auditors
- The level of competence of the function
- Including reperformance of some work.
International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 610: Using the Work of Internal Auditors
Determining whether internal auditors can be used to provide direct assistance for purposes of the audit
– The external auditor may be prohibited by law or regulation from obtaining direct assistance from internal auditors. If so, the following does not apply (610.26)
– If direct assistance is not prohibited, the external auditor evaluates the existence and significance of threats to objectivity and the level of competence of the internal auditors. This includes inquiry of the internal auditors regarding interests and relationships that may create a threat to their objectivity (610.27)
International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 610: Using the Work of Internal Auditors
Determining the nature and extent of work that can be assigned to internal auditors providing direct assistance
– In determining the nature and extent of work that may be assigned to internal auditors and the nature, timing and extent of direction, supervision and review that is appropriate in the circumstances, the external auditor considers: (610.29)
- The amount of judgment involved in planning and performing relevant audit procedures and in evaluating the audit evidence gathered
- The assessed risk of material misstatement
- The external auditor’s evaluation of the existence and significance of threats to the
objectivity and level of competence of the internal auditors
Limitation of Direct Assistance
- The regulator has several concerns about direct assistance.
- The Federal Audit Oversight Authority (FAOA) made the following comment:
“We still do not support the concept of internal auditors providing direct assistance to the external auditor for the following reasons”:
- Independence cannot be ensured
- Competence and objectivity of internal auditors providing direct assistance are not subject to the same level of regulation
- Management may put pressure on the external auditor to reduce the audit fee
The FINMA has similar concerns (FINMA-RS 2013/3):
- The external auditor is responsible for the audit opinion. The audit opinion is based on the auditors own judgement.
- Disclosure is required in case the auditor relies partly on work performed by internal audit.
- It is not allowed to use the work of internal audit in the same area for two consecutive years.
Definition of Internal Auditing
“Internal Auditing is an independent, objective assurance and consulting activity designed to add value and improve an organization‘s operations. It helps an organization accomplish its objectives by bringing a systematic, disciplined approach to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of risk management, control, and governance processes.”
Elements of the IIA Definition
- Independence and Objectivity
- Assurance and Consulting Services
- Value Added
- Improvement of the organization’s operations
- Support the achievement of the organization’s objectives
- Governance, risk management, and control processes
Explain Independence and Objectivity of internal auditor
The internal audit activity must be independent, and internal auditors must be objective in performing their work.
(IIA-Standard 1100 – Independence and Objectivity)
Independence
– Organizationalposition
– The chief audit executive must report to a level within the organization that allows the internal audit activity to fulfill its responsibilities
Objectivity
– Impartial, unbiased attitude of internal auditors
– Avoid any conflict of interest
– The details of an impairment to independence of objectivity must be disclosed to the appropriate parties
Organizational Independence
Independence is the freedom from conditions that threaten the ability of the internal audit activity to carry out internal audit responsibilities in an unbiased manner. The internal audit activity must be free from interference in determining:
– The scope ofinternalauditing
– Performingwork
– Communicating results
Independence concerns the organization’s structure:
– Thechiefauditexecutivereportstoalevelwithinthe organization that allows the internal audit activity to fulfill its responsibilities, e.g., to the board or the audit committee
– The chief audit executive has direct and unrestricted access to senior management and the board
– This can be achieved through ad ual-reporting relationship
Objectivity of Internal Auditors
- Objectivity is an unbiased mental attitude that allows internal auditors to perform engagements in such a manner that they believe in their work product and that no quality compromises are made
- Objectivity requires that internal auditors do not subordinate their judgment on audit matters to others
- Objectivity means that another person with a comparable level of experience would reach the same conclusions as the internal auditor under the same circumstances
- Disclosure of material facts, that might influence the internal auditor’s final communication of engagement results
Objectivity of Internal Auditors - conflict of interest
- To ensure an impartial, unbiased attitude, any conflict of interest must be avoided
- Conflict of interest is a situation in which an internal auditor has a competing professional or personal interest
- A conflict of interest can be cause by:
– Incentives
- The internal auditor has an economic interest
- The internal auditor is offered a position in the audited business unit
– Personal relationships
- The internal auditor is related to a close friend with an employee of the audited business unit
– Auditing of own work
Internal Audit Services, explain:
- Assurance
- Consulting
Assurance Services
An objective examination of evidence for the purpose of providing an independent assessment on governance, risk management, and control processes for the organization.
Examples include financial, performance, compliance, system security, and due diligence engagements.
Consulting Services
Advisory and related client service activities, the nature and scope of which are agreed with the client, are intended to add value and improve an organization’s governance, risk management, and control processes without the internal auditor assuming management responsibility.
Examples include counsel, advice, facilitation, and training.
How does IA add value ?
Add value
– Internal auditors obtain insight into the organization’s activities,
processes and structures
– The knowledge acquired enables internal auditors to identify
operational deficiencies and potential for improvement
– Internal auditors may present effective and useful approaches for
optimization to senior management and the board of directors
– By generating added value, the existence of an internal audit activity is legitimated