4 Flashcards
What are some of the factors that need to be taken into account when deciding which molecular marker(s) you would use in an ecological study?
table: overview some markers
AFLP’s
Microsats
DNA-sequencing
SNP’s
neutral loci
useful to understand genetic drift or mutation (neutral processes)
- Definition: Neutral loci are regions of the genome that do not experience strong natural selection. Genetic variation at neutral loci is primarily shaped by processes such as mutation, genetic drift, and migration.
- Common Markers: Microsatellites (simple sequence repeats or SSRs) and many single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are often considered neutral markers.
- Use: Neutral markers are frequently used to study population structure, historical demographic events, and gene flow. Because they are not under strong selective pressure, changes in neutral markers are assumed to reflect the demographic history of populations rather than adaptive processes.
functional loci
for understanding effect of selection in the past and local adaptation
- Definition: Functional loci are regions of the genome that code for proteins or have a regulatory role in gene expression. Genetic variation at functional loci can be subject to natural selection based on the functional consequences of the genetic changes.
- Common Markers: Exonic regions (coding regions) of genes, particularly non-synonymous SNPs (nsSNPs) that result in amino acid changes, are examples of functional markers. Regulatory regions that control gene expression are also considered functional markers.
- Use: Functional markers are often used to study adaptive evolution, investigate the genetic basis of phenotypic traits, and understand how natural selection acts on specific genes or genomic regions. They are valuable for exploring the relationship between genotype and phenotype.
which DNA is better, when we want to study genetic variability?
- nuDNA and not mtDNA
- for comparing individuals, pop. or species
when would I use a uniparental marker?
- Useful for studying maternal or paternal lineages specifically
- mtDNA
when would I use a biparental marker?
- Capture a broader range of genetic variation, making them suitable for population-level studies and mapping traits influenced by multiple genes.
- Can be informative for studying population genetics, genetic diversity, and complex traits.
when is a co-dominant marker the better choice?
- for calculating allelic frequencies
- and therefor for detecting homo- and heterozygotes
wich marker when studying the evolutionary history?
- very often mtDNA
- also autosomal DNA: SNP’s and Microsats
intra-pop.-scale
- differences inside the same pop
- F(is) = measure for estimating variability in the same population
- used to estimate inbreeding
- values between -1 (outbreeding) and 1 (inbreeding)
formula for intra-pop-variability
F(is) = measure to estimate variability (-1< x < 1)
- Hs = expected heterozygosity under HWE
- Hi = observed heterozygosity in my sample
F(is) = fixation index at intrapopulation scale)
for intra-pop. scales: what if Hs>Hi?
- less heterozygosity in my sample than expected
- the value will be positive
- indicates a level of inbreeding
for intra-pop. scales: what if Hs<Hi?
- negative value
- indicated outbreeding
for intra-pop. scales: what if F(is) = 0?
- pop in HWE
what do we study if we conduct the intra-pop. study (fixation index F(is)) on many loci?
- we then observe the fixation index on a genome scale
- we can study forces like genetic drift, inbreeding or outbreeding
why? –> these forces act on genome scale