3A: Operant Conditioning and Schedules of Reinforcement Flashcards
Principles of operant conditioning
Involves the strengthening or weakening of a behaviour as a result of the consequences.
Behaviours are voluntary or goal-directed.
The consequence of the behaviour affects future occurrences of that behaviour.
Reinforcers strengthen behaviours, punishers reduce a behaviour.
Law of effect
Behaviour is controlled by its consequences.
Behaviours that result in pleasant consequences will be more likely in the future.
Behaviours that result in unpleasant consequences will be less likely in the future.
Two types of behaviours
Reflexive type: involuntary, named respondent behaviour.
Operant: voluntary, behaviours controlled by consequences.
Operant antecedents
Discriminative stimulus (S^D): Indicates that a response will be followed by a contingency (reinforcer or punisher) e.g. light signals pressing a lever will now produce food.
Positive reinforcement
When behaviour is strengthened because it is followed by a reinforcing or rewarding stimulus
e.g. smile at someone (R) -> person smiles back (S^R)
Negative reinforcement
When behaviour is strengthened because it is followed by the removal of an aversive stimulus
e.g. Take a panadol (R) -> eliminate a headache (S^R)
Escape learning
Learning of a response that allows a subject to escape an aversive stimulus (e.g. switch off an electric shock).
Avoidance learning
Learning of a response that allows a subject to avoid an aversive stimulus.
e.g. learning that when a light comes on the shock is about to start and they much press the bar to prevent the shock.
Operant learning
Any procedure or experience in which a behavior becomes stronger or weaker (e.g., more or less likely to occur), depending on its consequences. Also called instrumental learning.
Using positive reinforcement
It is important for learning that an organism wants to take part in activities and learns new skills via desired behaviours, not because it is scare of a consequence/being punished.
Primary reinforcers
Unlearned
Inherently reinforcing because they satisfy a biological need (e.g. food, water)
Unconditioned reinforcers
Secondary reinforcers
Conditioned reinforcers
Are learnt or become reinforcers after being associated with primary reinforcers (e.g. money)
Natural reinforcers
Any reinforcer that is the spontaneous consequence of a behavior. Also called automatic reinforcer.
e.g. brush your teeth in the morning and morning breath goes away.
Contrived reinforcer
Any reinforcer that is provided by someone for the purpose of changing behavior.
Contingency
The extent to which the behaviour and the consequence are correlated.
The stronger the correlation, the more effective the reinforcer is likely to be.
e.g. if likely to get food by not pressing lever, won’t continue pressing lever.
Contiguity
The gap between a behaviour and its consequence.
In general, the shorter the interval the faster learning occurs.
Usually, if too long left between, can cause confusion.
Some learning can occur despite a delay, however.
Reinforcer characteristics
Some reinforcers work better than others.
The size and the strength of the reinforcer can impact conditioning.
Generally, a large reinforcer will be more effective than a small one. BUT frequent small reinforcers may work better.
Behaviour characteristics
Certain aspects of a behaviour may be easier to learn than others.
Remember: task difficulty will vary with species and that it is easier to train/teach behaviours that are somewhat aligned to an animals natural behaviour.
Motivating operations
Anything that changes the effectiveness of a consequence - either in terms of increasing or decreasing its effectiveness.
Establishing operations
Increase the effectiveness of a consequence.
The greater the deprivation the more powerful the reinforcer e.g. food.
Abolishing operations
Decrease the effectiveness of a consequence.
Drive reduction theory
The event is reinforcing if it is associated with a reduction of a physiological drive (primary reinforcer).
Not comprehensive enough, unsatisfactory explination of reinforcers.
Premack’s principle
Helps us understand what can be used as a reinforcer.
High probability behaviour can be used to reinforce a low probability behaviour.
Reinforcers as behaviours and reinforcement as a sequence of two behaviours:
1. Behaviour being reinforced
2. Behaviour that is the reinforcer
e.g. rats running get a drink
Response deprivation hypothesis
The theory of reinforcement that says a behavior is reinforcing to the extent that the organism has been deprived (relative to its baseline frequency) of performing that behavior.