3_TheCityAsAGrowthMachine_LoganMolotch Flashcards
The City as a Growth Machine John R. Logan Harvey L. Molotch
What separates local elite groups from people who use the city principally as a place to live and work?
The issue of growth / Growth Consensus
(p.50)
Three real-world examples of Growth Consensus
The southern U.S. border, D’Antonio (1970), “knowledgeables” named finding water for farming and urban growth to be the most important problem facing their cities
In Dallas and Fort Worth, Melosi (1983) found power in the hands of “those most willing and able to sustain growth and expansion.”
California Transportation policies, Whit (1982), elites carefully coordinated positions and also money donated toward winning certain campaigns
(p.51-2)
What was discovered by Lyon’s (1981) study of cities with more powerful elites?
Cities with more powerful elites tend to have stronger growth rates
(p.52)
Boorstin (1965) said of western regions that the “lively competitive spirit [was more of] a competition among communities __________”
The “lively competitive spirit [was more of] a competition among communities than among individuals.”
- Boorstin (1965)
(p.53)
What did Boorstin describe as “paper villages”?
Communities of subdivisions with town names on them
(This exists today in Chicago suburbs)
(p.53)
What do paper villages compete amongst themselves for?
- federal land offices
- colleges / academies
- prisons
- (!!important!!) transportation infrastructure (roads, railroads, canal waterways)
(p.53)
What is Ogden famous for?
- Chicago Mayor
- Railway Developer (Union Pacific organizer and first President)
- Made Chicago into a dominant metropolis of the midwest
(p.55)
What is the story of Los Angeles’s unexpected success?
LA had none of the “natural” features that are thought to support urban growth (no centrality, no harbour, no transport, no water supply)
Port cities in California were competing to be the location of the end of the First Continental Railroad; the main fight was between San Francisco and San Diego. San Francisco won, because their elites used their financial and political powers to keep San Diego from becoming the southern route. They did not pay attention to LA. Even though San Diego had the better natural resources, those resources actually became it’s downfall bc it made the city a target for other high growth cities. Eventually, LA won millions in federal funds, and created the world’s largest artificial harbour, as well as federal backing to gain water.
(p.55)
Give an example of a local elite winning over a competing paper village, but NOT to the benefit of their own local community
Detroit suffered when local elites put money and influence into expanding uninhabited areas for industrial development at the cost of the Detroit taxpayer, without putting funding into services those working-class residents paying for the new installations
(p.57)
Why did the Growth Machines seen in U.S. history get replaced by the Modern-Day Good Business Climate?
- The fusing of public duty and private gain has become less acceptable (in public opinion and criminal courts alike)
- The new roles played by mass media, urban professionals, and skilled political entrepreneurs
- Instead of a few local heroes, the growth machine is now a less personalized matrix of social institutions with similar agendas
- Transportation and communication grids are largely already implemented, so modern cities seek growth in basic economic functions and labour
(p.57-58)
Bases (types) of economic growth which contemporary cities strive to build
- manufacturing
- research & development
- information processing
- tourism
(p.58)
How do contemporary cities benefit from economic growth?
more intense land use –> higher rent collections
(p.58)
In what ways can cities affect “factors of production” which drive local growth? (There are 9)
- Create shipping ports and airfields to lower access costs to raw materials
- Make sympathetic policies on pollution reduction / employee healthcare standards / taxes, in order to decrease corporate overhead costs
- …………. pushing welfare recipients into low-paying jobs and using police to constrain union organising, in order to reduce labor costs indirectly
- Legalising alcohol and/or promoting gambling to promote tourism and convention business
- Provide cheap water supplies using Federally financed programs
- state agencies can be manipulated to subsidise insurance rates
- local political units can forgive business property taxes
- Government installations of certain sorts (universities, military bases) can provide additional development by guaranteeing the presence of skilled labor, retailing customers, or proximate markets for subcontractors
(p.58)
Who has the most to gain/lose in land-use decision for the city?
People who use their time/money to participate in local affairs are the ones who –in vast disproportion to their representation in the population– have the most to gain or lose in land-use decisions fro the city
(p.62)
What is “boosterism?”
(not always directly called boosterism, sometimes just referred to as boosting, but it’s a phenomenon recurrently referenced in this text)
When any locality (neighborhood scale to country scale) tries to boost connect civic pride to the growth goal, in hopes of attracting new business to the area
(p.58 / p.60)