3.8.8 - Public Ownership, Privitisation, Regulation and Deregulation of Markets Flashcards
What is public ownership?
Ownership of industries, firms and other assets such as social housing by a central government or local authority.
The state acquiring such assets is known as nationalisation.
When did the main period of nationalisation occur in the UK?
Post Second World War under Clement Attlee’s Labour party.
How did the Labour governments of the 1940s and 1950s justify nationalisation?
In order to state plan effectively, the ‘commanding heights’ of the economy were required.
Commanding heights being coal, railways, steel etc.
How can public ownership be used with reference to monopolies?
In industries with natural monopolies, the state can intervene and nationalise it.
What is temporary nationalisation?
Temporarily taking firms into public ownership as they are regarded as ‘too important to fail’.
An example of this was the bailout of Northern Rock, Lloyds, RBS and HBOS during the 2008 financial crisis.
What is privatisation?
The transfer of publically owned assets to the private sector.
What is the case for privatisation?
- Revenue raising
- Reducing public spending and government borrowing
- The promotion of competition
- Promotion of efficiency
- Popular capitalism
Why is revenue raising a case for privatisation?
If the government sells off a valuable asset to a private firm, they can make up to £4 billion a year.
However, you can only sell an asset once so this is a one-off payment.
Why is reducing public spending and government borrowing an argument for privatisation?
Selling off loss making businesses reduces public spending on subsidies to ensure firms remain afloat.
Why is the promotion of competition an argument for privatisation?
Breaking up the monopoly should increase competition. The prevalence of technology driven competition and regulatory agencies such as Ofcom, Ofgem and the CMA significantly increased competition.
However, some monopolies are natural in nature, so removing the monopoly will not increase competition.
Why is the promotion of efficiency an argument for privatisation?
The culture of nationalised industries make them resistant to change as the government will always bail them out.
The exposure to threat of takeover and the discipline of the capital market, the efficiency of the business should improve.
Why is popular capitalism an argument for privatisation?
Privatisation extends share ownership to employees and other individuals who had not previously owned shares, thus adding the incentive for the electorate to support privatisation.
What are the arguments against privatisation?
- Monopoly abuse
- Short-termism over long-termism
- Selling the ‘family silver’
- Free-lunch syndrome
Why is monopoly abuse an argument against privatisation?
For the instance of natural monopolies, breaking up the nationalised monopoly will promote monopoly abuse as weakly regulated and less accountable private monopolies will abuse their power more than nationalised industries will.
Why is short-termism over long-termism an argument against privatisation?
Many investments made in state-owned monopolies are only be profitable in the long-run.
Under private monopolies, these investments will not be made as company boards focus on short-term benefits such as delivering dividends to keep shareholders and financial institutions happy.
However, in nationalised industry, an argument is that nationalised industries are starved of funding by the government to keep government spending down.