3.7 The Political Nation, 1658-60 Flashcards
Cromwell’s death
Oliver Cromwell died on 3 September 1658. Cromwell nominated his son Richard Cromwell as the next Protector.
The Third Protectorate Parliament
The accession of Richard was generally accepted by many gentry. There was a feeling that the new Protector was more in tune with the traditional gentry.
The army’s response
At first the army’s response was also favourable. Many hoped Richard would support the army and some believed he would be easier to manipulate. It was soon clear that Richard’s character and intended policies were more in favour of the ‘civilians’.
Opposition Richard was met with:
- From republicans, who were against a Protectorate, and from Lambert, who distrusted the civilians. Republicans refused to recognise Richard as Protector.
- From the army: measures to restrict religious toleration provoked them.
Dissolution of Parliament
The army, triggered by Parliament discussing settling the army as a militia forced Richard to dissolve Parliament which saw the end of his Protectorate in May 1659. The Rump Parliament was reinstated by the army.
Power vacuum
Oliver Cromwell’s death had left a power vacuum, and the key groups of the Interregnum failed to produce a workable settlement. By December 1659 many people feared a slide into anarchy.
Civilian Cromwellians/Presbyterians
- Sought a more traditional parliamentary settlement and a reduction of the army’s influence.
- Commonswealthsmen/republicans wanted to weaken army influence.
Army leaders, Charles Fleetwood and Desborough
- Wanted continuation of the Protectorate.
- Soldiers/junior officers worked with the republicans to establish a regime based on the authority of Parliament.
Quakers
- Were linked with Lambert. They scared the traditional PN by acting to secure religious freedom.
- Charles Stuart was a bystander in exile but wanted to be king.
Division of the New Model Army
- The army was not a united force in this period.
- The army leader George Monck in Scotland had different ideas about the direction of settlement and the army in England was divided.
- The army leaders Fleetwood and Desborough were not ideologically opposed to the concept of a Protectorate and were supportive of Richard Cromwell.
- Republican propaganda exploited junior officers’ concerns over pay and persuaded them to force army leaders to reluctantly recall the Rump in May 1659.
Council of Officers
With the removal of the Protectorate, power in the short term was in the hands of the Council of Officers, the body that led the army. After dismissing those officers and civilians loyal to Richard, this Council reappointed radical army officers like Lambert to command the New Model.
Lambert and Haselrig
Were opposites in political outlooks. Haselrig and the leading republican politicians of the Rump did not recognise their dependence on the army and sought to assert their political authority.
The Humble Petition and Address of the Officers
Included 15 articles outlining the ‘Fundamentals of our Good Old Cause’, notably a senate to protect the army’s interests from Parliament.
Haselrig
- Was the main opponent of the Address and the army.
- Haselrig would accept no reduction of the Commons’ authority.
- Haselrig and the Rump, in effect, were committing political suicide by alienating the army.
George Booth’s rising, August 1659
- Was a reaction by previous supporters of Parliament and some Royalists against the radicalism of the army.
- Fact that Haselrig supported Lambert’s command of the armed force to counter the rising shows how serious the rebellion was taken.
- Booth and his men sought negotiation and Lambert demanded surrender.
- Rising was crushed in a brief but intense encounter at Winnington Bridge in August 1659.