3.4.4 Oligopoly Flashcards
Oligopoly
Oligopoly is where there are a few firms that dominate the market and have the majority of market share, although this does not mean there won’t be other firms in the market.
Characteristics of oligopolies
1) Differentiated products
2) High concentration ratio
3) Interdependent
4) Barriers to entry
Differentiated products (oligopolies)
Products are not identical and have recognisable differences between them
High concentration ratio (oligopolies)
Supply in the industry must be concentrated in the hands of a relatively small number of firms.
Interdependent (oligopolies)
Actions of one firm will directly affect another.
N-firm concentration ratios
The concentration of supply in the industry can be indicated by the concentration ratio which measures the percentage of the total market that a particular number of firms have .
3 firm concentration ratio
Shows the percentage of the total market held by the three biggest firms, whilst the 4 firm ratio shows the percentage by the four biggest firms and so on.
- It is worked out by adding the percentages of market share for the firms or using the formula:
total sales of n firms/total size of market x 100
(The method used will depend on the information in the question.)
Collusion
When firms make collective agreements that reduce competition. When firms don’t collude, this is a competitive oligopoly.
- The UK energy market is an oligopoly that is suspected of collusion.
Reasons for collusive behaviour
- If firms compete, they know lowering prices to gain new customers is likely to cause other firms to lower their prices. However, if they work together, they could maximise industry profits.
- Collusion reduces the uncertainty firms face and reduces the fear of engaging in competitive price cutting or advertising, which will reduce industry profits.
Reasons for non-collusive behaviour
- Firms may decide to be a non-collusive oligopoly since collusion is illegal and due to the risks of collusion, such as other firms breaking the cartel (a cartel is a form of collusion between suppliers. A cartel occurs when two or more firms (usually within an oligopoly) enter into agreements to restrict the market supply and thereby fix the price of a product in a particular industry) or prices being set where they don’t want it.
- A firm with a strong business model and something that sets it apart from other firms will not want to collude if they feel they can increase market share and/or charge higher prices than competitors.
When does collusion between firms work best?
When:
- there are a few firms which are all well known to each other
- the firms are not secretive about costs and production methods and the costs and production methods are similar
- they produce similar products
- there is a dominant firm which the others are happy to follow
- the market is relatively stable; and there are high barriers to entry
Collusive oligopolies
When firms engage in collusion, they may agree on prices, market share or advertising expenditure.
Overt and tacit collusion
There are two main types of collusion:
- Overt collusion is when firms come to a formal agreement
- Tacit collusion means there is no formal agreement
Cartel
A formal collusive agreement is called a cartel, which is a group of firms who enter into agreement to mutually set prices.
- The rules will be laid out in a formal document which may be legally enforced and fines will be charged for firms who break these rules.
How cartels operate
There are two ways a cartel could operate:
1) Agree on a price for the goods and then compete freely using non-price competition to maximise their market share
2) Agree to divide up the market according to the present market share of each business
Cartels evaluation
No firm is likely to set their prices/output at the level they would not ideally choose and there is constant temptation to break the cartel.
- The more successful the cartel, the greater the incentive to break it; it is important for firms to be the first to break it and not the firm who is left to deal with the after effects.
Tacit collusion
Since collusion is illegal, firms may be involved in tacit collusion such as price leadership and barometric firm.
Other examples could be unwritten rules about keeping advertising low or not trying to take each other’s customers.
Price leadership
Where firm has advantages due to its size or costs and becomes the dominant firm. Other firms will tend to follow this firm because they would be fearful of taking on the firm on in any form of price war. As a result, the dominant firm will decide the price and allow the other firms to supply as much as they wish at this price.
Barometric firm price leadership
Where a firm develops a reputation for being good at predicting the next move in the industry and other firms decide to follow their leader.
Non-collusive oligopoly
The behaviour of a firm under non-collusive oligopoly will depend on how it thinks other firms will react to its policies.
- Game theory can be used to examine the best strategy a firm can adopt for each assumption about its rivals.
Game theory
Game theory explores the reactions of one player to changes in strategy by another player. The aim is to examine the best strategy a firm can adopt for each assumption about its rival’s behaviour and it provides insight into interdependent decision making that occurs in competitive markets. The easiest way of demonstrating this is where duopoly exists in the market, so there are two identical firms.
Game theory strategies
There are two strategies the firm could take: a maximin policy or a maximax. The maximin policy involves firms working out the strategy where the worst possible outcome is the least bad. Alternatively, the maximax policy involves firms working out the policy with the best possible outcome.
- If the maximin and maximax strategies end up with the same solution, this is called the dominant strategy. However, dominant strategies aren’t that common in real life and the best strategy for a firm tends to depend on what the other firm does.
Nash equilibrium
In some cases, there is a Nash Equilibrium where neither player is able to improve their position and has optimised their outcome based on the other players expected decision. They have no incentive to change behaviour, unless someone else changes theirs.
Prisoner’s dilemma
One common example of game theory is the prisoner’s dilemma. In the situation, two people are questioned over their involvement in a crime and are kept apart so they can’t communicate. The dominant strategy in this situation is to confess: it’s the greatest reward (3 months rather than a year) and the least bad (3 years rather than 10 years). However, if the prisoners could collude or had confidence in one another, the best option would be to deny the crime; this is the Nash equilibrium.