3.4 Market Structures Flashcards
Allocative Efficiency
MC=AR
The socially desireable level of output
Minimising their costs
Productive Efficiency
MC=AC
Where the firm produces at their lowest possible cost
Profit maximising point
MC=MR
Dynamic efficiency
When a firm reinvests into R+D and innovation, become more efficient, reduce costs, increased SNP
Characteristics of Perfect Competition
Very large no of small firms
No barriers to entry/exit
Perfect knowledge of the market
Firms are so small they cannot set prices - price takers
All firms produce homogeneous goods (can’t distinguish/no branding or brad loyalty)
Perfect Comp SN profits (SR)
If AC is below AR, they will be making SNP. Other firms will be attracted to this and as there is perfect info and no barriers, they too will join the market. Meaning that S shifts right, decreasing industry price, demand falls - firms make normal profit
Perfect Comp Losses (SR)
If firms are loss making, they will begin to leave the industry. S will shift right and prices increase. (firms can make normal profit). Isn’t attractive to new entrants. No SNP is being made but costs are covered.
Drawing perfect competition
Draw an S+D graph for the industry which then sets the price for the firm.
Demand is perfectly elastic (if firms increase price, D falls to 0 as goods are homogeneous)
Characteristics of Monopolistic competition
Very large no of small firms
Low barriers to entry/exit
Perfect knowledge of the market
Firms can raise their prices without losing their entire market share
All firms produce slightly differentiated goods (extent of brand loyalty)
Drawing Monopolistic
MR is twice as steep as AR
MC cuts AC at it’s lowest point
Not Productively/Allocatively efficient
Characteristics of Oligopolies
Few firms dominate an industry: a large proportion of the industry’s output is produced by a small number of firms.
Differentiated products
Interdependence of firms
High barriers to entry
Drawing Oligopoly
What is the the concentration ratio
The proportion of market share of the largest firms in the industry.
CR4 = 60% four firms own 60% of MS
Define Barriers to entry
Aspects of a market which are designed to block potential entrants from entering a market profitably
BtE allow firms to continue making SNP in the LR
Types of barriers to entry
Natural (exist due to industry structure): High sunk costs, High fixed costs, EoS, Vertical integration
Artificial (created by firms to deter entrants): Strong brand image, legal restrictions, collusion, pricing strategies[ set P below AVC]
Define collusion
collective agreements between firms that are either formal or tacit with an aim to reduce competition
Who monitors/enforces anti-competitive behaviour
CAM: Competition and markets authority
Anti-competitive behaviour is prohibited in the UK
Leniency programme
Does the CMA’s fine deter firms from colluding
No, as the supernormal profits outweigh the CMA’s fine.
Sanctions for collusions
Leniency programme incentives
Direct the firm to modify or terminate the agreement
Impose a financial penalty of max 10% worldwide turnover (if it has been committed internationally or negligently)
Disqualification of managers of up to 15 years
Possible criminal sanctions - max 5 years prison
Why cartels?
Increase prices by removing competition
Remove the incentive for businesses to operate efficiently and to innovate
Consumer choice is weakened
Overt collusion: Cartel
Overt and most extreme case of collusion - An agreement between businesses not to compete with each other
price fixing, bid rigging, market sharing, output restrictions
Cartel - Estate Agent case study
[Price fixing] Kept their fees high - min commision rates of 1.5% = denied local homeowners the chances of getting a better deal when selling their homes - Decreases CS
Market share was as much as 95%
They took it in turns to police the agreement
Fined £370,000 by the CMA, 6th fine not fined as they confessed their involvement
Cartel - Fender case study
They sold their guitars at/above min price and forced retailers to increase their online prices
Fined £4.5mil but annual SNP of £380mil outweighs the fine, employees deliberately covered up
Means consumers could not shop for the best price, significant decreased CS
Tacit collusion
When firms’ behaviour indicates that they have reached an understanding on pricing and output decisions.
Tacit collusion: price leadership
The dominant firm increases prices and others follow, the price leader will set a price high enough for even the most inefficient firm to still make profit. It can be very complex to prove
i.e rising prices in the UK utility companies
Collusion graph
They work together to set a price
Firms act as a (monopoly) single producer
They charge a monopoly price
Restrict output
Make SNP in SR and LR
Not PE or AE: oligopoly price is much higher and Q is much lower
Market failure: P is greater than the SOL
Q is under-produced
SOL is AE where MC=AR