3.3 Flashcards
Elizabethan poor law 1601
- parish set poor rate and determined wether eligible and how much
- parish used unpaid, non professional administrators
administering poor law
- paid officals in large towns
- setting work was up to churchwardens and overseers of the poor (e.g farmers - those who had to pay poor rate)
- argued to be more humane as locals would know better what each other needed
- also had opportunity for tyrannical behaviour from overseeres
- local crisis e.g poor harvest could put immense burden on locally raised finances
Catogerisation of the poor
- implemented in attempt to bring some consistency
- writers and reformers regarded poverty as inevitable and neccessary e.g only through fear of poverty would people work
- ‘indigence’ was wrong -> poor laws never attempted to stop poverty but to force poor people to work to stop more indigence
- 19th century ‘deserving’ (old, sick children) and ‘undeserving’ (drunkenness) poor
- all help to undeserving contained elements of punishment
- fears poor may be attracted to idle life
When was the settlement act?
1662
Aims of the settlement act
clarify existing problems with settlement under elizabethan poor laws
Achievements of settlement act 1662
- legal settlement by birth, marriage, apprentaship
- 1667 further tightened, strangers could not work without settlement certificate
- designed to ensure burden of providing for poor was not too much for parish
Limitations of the settlement act
- most strangers left alone until tried to claim relief -> 1795 removal act
- prevented paupers who did not have legal settlement from getting help
- overseeres manipulated the system
- lots of arguments between parishes who wanted to keep their poor rate low
- hated and evaded by paupers
Overall impact of settlement act
- genuine attempt to provide every person with a cleary defined legal settlement
- clear criteria for removal and settlement
- ineffective as corrupt and hated
- could not manage a mobile population/keep up with the issuing and carrying out of settlement orders
Outdoor relief
- able bodied paupers in their own homes
- easy and flexible e.g breadwinner ill or cyclical unenemployment
- new outdoor relief systems needed after 1750 due to industralisation
- bad harvests and strain of napeolonic wars bought poor law to breaking point
When was the speenhamlands system?
1795
Aims of speenhamlands
- provide relief by subsidising low wages
- use price of bread and number of dependants in family
Achievements of speenhamlands
- most widley used
Limitations of speenhamlands
- some took each child into consideration but some only took into account once over a certain number
- did not always give cash, some flour
Overall impacts of speenhamlands
- widley adopted over south and east
- seasonal unemployment been exacerbated by the loss of cottage industries and lack of avalibility of allotments to grow own and loss of common land (enclosure) = hamper success
- never given legal backing despite attempts
Aim of Roundsman system
method for work to be found in parishes where there are too many paupers for work avaliable
method of the roundsman system
- gave each pauper a ticket for an employer authorising them to work under the parish
- when returned with signed ticket, parish make up the difference between wage from poor rates
Limitations of the roundsman system
- farmers took advantage as they did not have to pay set wages
Aims of the labour rate
provide relief that avoided problems of roundsman
Sucess of labour rate
- established a labour rate and usual poor rate across parishes
- ratepayers who employed pauper and paid them at the rate set did not have to pay poor rates
- prevented the abuse of roundsman
- 1832 one in five parishes used
Elizabethan indoor relief system
- poorhouses, workhouses and houses of correction
- impotent poor to be in poorhouses, able bodied poor in workhouses and those who refused in houses of correction
- however did not work in practise and was not cost effective
- many realised needed to find a more cost effective way e.g some already combined
- outdoor relief remained most common
When was the Gilberts act
1782
What was the aim of the gilberts act
- aid the struggling administrative system of relief -> soldiers and sailors after american war, enclosure created long term unemployment and pressure on urban cities from industrialisation
Achievements of the gilberts act
- parishes could combine in poor law unions to build and maintain workhouses
- required to submit reports of poor law expenditure
- ministers and churchwardens required to provide information about local charities
- able bodied excluded from workhouses, only impotent
- parish guardian had to find work for able-bodied, if not then outdoor relief provided
Limitations of gilberts act
- permissive despite attempts to make mandatory
Overall impact of Gilberts act
- parishes were slow to adopt and not forced to
- 1834 (new poor law), 924 parishes combined into 67 unions
- all unions in rural areas of midlands, south east and east
When were the Sturges-Bourne acts
1818 and 1819
Aims of S-B
tie landowners, gentry and upper class more firmly into administration of poor relief
Successes of S-B
- elected men to parish select vestries to be responsible for local administration
- distinguished between deserving and undeserving poor to decide relief
- 1825, 46 select vestries had been formed and reported a significant drop in cost of relief
- national reduction in cost after first year = 9%
Limitations of S-B
- permissive and only applied to parishes who voted to adopt
- reduction is cost wouldve been at the expense of the destitute
Less eligibility and workhouse test
- paupers should fear the workhouses
- conditions inside had to be less desierable than outside
- Lowe policy ‘less eligibility’
- workhouse test = only genuine destitue would accept relief on these terms
- children, old, sick and disabled exempt from test as deemed deserving
When were the Napelonic war with France
1783-1815
Impact of the war
- led to greater demands for poor relief
- pressure of poor law
- almost bought state to collapse
Impact of the war on harvests
- 1813 and 1814
- harvests good
- cheap foreign corn could be imported from europe = forces farmers to keep prices low
- had to pay wartime taxes and intrests to cover costs of enclosures
- many went bankrupt = unemployment for labourers
- forced to claim relief
- those who lasted had to pay labourers less = push to pauperism
How did the Tory gov try to improve in 1815
- corn laws to protect british farmers = not allowed import of foreign corn until british corn reached 80 shillings a quater
- many resented the corn laws as believed kept price of bread too high = riots as poor could not afford bread
Impact of post-war distress
- more people than ever claiming relief
- began to view relief as a right
- returning soldiers, dislocation of trade and poor harvests made situation
- radical protests exacerbated forcing gov to suspend habeas corpus and introduce the six acts
- forced the gov to be repressive = unlikely to legislate any help to relief
- 1817 report condemned Poor law for creating poverty
When were the swing riots?
1830
Aims of swing riots
- higher wages
removal of the steam-powered thresing machienes that created cyclical unemployment = forcing them into poverty
Successes of swing riots
- village in sussex demanded higher allowances -> frightened gentry who agreed to demands
- revealed pent up greviances against changes in farming and harsh poor relief policies
- forced authorities to deal with problem
- created a political climate in parliament where poor law reforms were becoming more likely
Events of the swing riots
- Hampshire - broke threshing machines and pulled down workhouses
- Wiltshire violently targeted MP, who drew harsh allowance for poor relief
- petitions and threats signed
Regional differnces - Nottinghamshire
- fifth most industralised country in Britain = relatively prosperous
- knitting industry and alternate industries for when less rural employment
- 1820-23 expenditure of relief less than 11 shillings - well below average
- Rev Becher driving force behind amalgamtion go 49 parishes into a large union -> emphasis on kindness and education for children
- Rev Lowe wanted outdoor relief abolsihed and make WH a place of fear
- Nicholls saw allowance systems as responsible for the continuation of poverty
Regional differences - Gloucestershire
- 1830 Lloyd Baker started reforming poor law administration
- used an allowance system
- introduced rigirous reforms and in two years number of paupers fell from 977 to 125
- abolsihed outdoor relief and made WH so dreadful only desperate would go
- similar policies in Cornwall and Derbyshire
Regional differences - Berkshire
- gave able-bodied lower rate than normal
- removed 63 long-term recipients
- London, Bristol, Norwich similar
Similarities in regional differences
- all trying to lower cost of poor rates
- reduce pauperism
Thomas Malthus (1766-1834)
- economist specalised in demography
- argued population would outstrip all avaliable food supplies
- poor law made situation worse as encouraged poor to have more children to claim more relief
- favoured abolition of the poor law = force to keep families small as no finacial advantage and wages would rise as poor rate no more = everyone would prosper
David Ricardo (1772-1823)
- political economist agreeing with Malthus
- wrote on the principles of political economy and taxation (1817)
- idea of iron law of wages and wage fund
- as less money avaliable for wages, people drawn into pauperism = draining wage fund
- only way to break cycle was to abolish poor laws
Thomas Paine (1737-1809)
- writer and republican
- criticsed poor law for being inadequate
- proposed property tax on very rich to use to support systems for the poor e.g family allowances, pensions
- believed able-bodied should go into workhouses before recieving relief
Robert Owen
- radical factory owner
- blamed capitalist economic system for creating poverty
- built a community in his mill workers villages = no adult allowed to work 10.5hr+, sick pay, children had to be educated corporal punishment forbidden, sold goods to workers at cost price
- mills still had profit
Influence of Utilitariansim
- developed by Bentham
- principle based on happiness
- had profound influence on the thinking of those developing new poor law
believed: - relief was a public responsibility and should be organised by central gov
- should be a gov minister responsible e.g looking at stats and WH
- all outdoor relief abolished and only relief given to those prepared to go to WH
- no discriminatioin between deserving and undeserving poor
Why did the government take action in 1832?
- general election 1831 elected Whigs (favour of reform)
- general consensus amoung properited class that something had to be done about increasing cost
- 1832 announced a royal commission would be set up to investigate poor laws