3.2 - MANAGEMENT, LEADERSHIP AND DECISION MAKING Flashcards
Role of managers
- set objectives
- analyses and interoperates data
- make and review decisions
- appraise employee strengths and weaknesses
- lead staff
Leadership styles - Authoritarian
- makes decision on own
- useful for unskilled workers and in crisis management
- can be demotivating for able employees
Leadership styles - paternaistic
- softer form of autocratic
- leader consults before making decisions - explains decisions to persuade them that decisions are in their interest
- positive motivator
Leadership styles - Democratic
- encourages workforce to participate in
- discus issues with workers, delegated and listen to advice
- often increases motivation and takes wight of leaders
Leadership styles - Laissez-faire
- weak form of leadership
- rarely interfere with running a business
- hands-off approach, will only work with a small, highly motivated team of able workers
TannenBaum Schmidt - tells
- authoritarian
- zero involvement
- not trusted with decisions
TannenBaum Schmidt - sells
- manager makes decision but presents to workforce
- can ask questions but aren’t involved in decisions
TannenBaum Schmidt- suggests
- decision outlined to workforce
- allowed to discuss and ask questions
- helps them feel their opinion is being considered
TannenBaum Schmidt- consults
- manager proposes decision and invites discussion
- decision is open to modification
- recognises insight and value of workforce
TannenBaum Schmidt - Joins
- manager proposes problem and workforce discus solutions
- manager will make final decision
- useful if workforce have specififc knowledge
TannenBaum Schmidt - delegates
- workforce discus proposed decision and make final choice
- manager will be held accountable
- shows high level of trust in employees
TannenBaum Schmidt - Abdicates
- team define and solve problem
- ultimate level of freedom
- team is highly trusted, which should be very motivating
- manager is still accountable for the decision
What is the Blake Mouton Grid?
The grid assess managers based on how much they care about their employees and how much they care about production
Blake Mouton grid - impoverished style
- low concern for people and production
- low level of motivation and productivity
- poor management
Blake mouton grid - Produce or perish style
- Authoritarian
- often leads to the neglect of workers Ed’s and a demotivated workforce
- may result n heigh levels of staff turnover
Blake mouton grid - Country Club Style
- over-concern with worker welfare
- happy but not very motivated or productive workplace
- doesn’t help increase output
Blake Mouton grid - Middle of the road
- average concern for worker needs and average focus on production
- leads to medicore results
Blake Mouton grid - Team style
- ideal leadership style
- high concern for people and production
- happy, motivated and productive staff
- often used non-financial methods of motivation
scientific decision making
- based on data and outcomes compared to initial objectives
- reduces the risk of expensive mistakes being made
- logical and structured approach
- can be costly and time consuming - involves collecting and analysing data
- need to make sure data is reliable and up-to-date
intuitive decision making
- based an a hunch/gut instinct
- can be sensed based on past experience by good managers
- can be made quickly, if its a new situation data may not be useful
- it can be risky as gut insists are often irrational
opportunity cost
- the benefit that’s given up to do something else
- puts value on a business in terms of what had to be given up
- businesses must choose where to use their limited resources
- opportunity cost is the value of the next best alternative that’s given up
decision trees
- they know what the cost will be, but often the outcome isn’t certain
- probability is the likelihood of something occurring
- the expected value is the probability of something occurring, multiplied by the expected pay off
- net gain is the financial gain after initial costs of he decision have been subtracted
advantages of decision trees
- allows managers think about the probability and potential pay-off
- visual reputation of potential outcomes
- useful in familiar situations where a business has enough experience to make accurate estimations
disadvantages of decision trees
- no qualitive data, which businesses should always use when making decisions
- probabilities are hard to predict accurately
internal stakeholders - people inside the business
- owners are the most important stakeholders (decide what happens in a business)
- in limited companies shareholders are the owners (high dividend and share price)
external stakeholders - people outside the business
- customers (high quality, low prices)
-suppliers (fair price, on time) - local community (will suffer if noise pollution and job loss)
- government (good profits = more taxes)
stakeholder objectives
- businesses have to strike a balance to try keep all stakeholders happy
- important to balance short-term profit and social responsibility
- example - may cut labour costs by relocating production abroad, which will mean job loss in the UK which is bad for employees and the local community
- Company must satisfy as many groups as possible and still survive finically
Stakeholder mapping
- considers power and interest
- the map helps how best to manage stakeholders
- stakeholders are divided into four quadrants which determines how much communication and attention is needed
- high power and high interest are managed the most closely as they are the most vital
- little power and little interest require monitoring but are less important
stakeholder relationships
- businesses need to mange relationships with stakeholders
- putting one stakeholder over the other can result in consequences for other areas in the company
- consulting with stakeholders is a good way of managing relationships as they will feel more valued in the company
- good communication is vital