3.2. Describe the contribution of agencies to achieving social control. Flashcards
Some criminologists argue built environment can affect level of crime in 2 ways:
- Influencing potential offenders e.g. presenting them with opportunities to commit crime.
- Affecting people’s ability to exercise control over their surroundings.
- By Design: Environtmental design - C.R. Jeffrey (CPTED)
Introduced appraoch called Crime Prevention through Environment and Design (CPTED).
- Suggested the form and arrangements of buildings and open spaces can encourage or discourage crime.
- He claimed that fostering of positive use of space can help reduce crime. Approach has been adopted by some (e.g. In UK, the Birmingham City Bull Ring Market Stalls).
- Criticised - idea has little impact has been seen on reudcion of crime figures (Tim Newburn).
(environmental design) Examples of CPTED:
- Design transparency, open space and green areas (reduces hiding spaces).
- Gated lanes/alley ways - restricts access to housing and prevents access to lanes for potential criminal activity.
- CCTV/cameras might make people think twice about committing a crime.
- Traffic lights to strengthen surveillance.
- Prison design (Panoptican, open prisons and super-max designs).
(environmental design) What are indefensible spaces? (Newman)
Where crime is more likely to occur, in what he calls ‘confused’ areas of public space (anonymous walkways or stairwells). Belong to no one, cared for by no one, and observed by no one.
(environmental design) What are defensible spaces? (Newman)
Areas where there are clear boundaries so it’s obvious who has the right to be there. Newman argues defensible spaces have low crime rates because of 4 key features:
1. Territorality - where environment encourages sense of ownership among residents.
2. Natrual surveillance - features of buildings allow residents to identity and observe strangers (street-level windows).
3. A safe image - building designs give impression of safe neighbourhood.
4. A safe location - neighbourhoods located in middle of wider crime-free area are insulated from outside worls by ‘moat’ of safety.
(environmental design) Gated lanes - example of CPTED.
Are lockable gates installed to prevent offenders gaining access to alleyways. Used mostly to prevent burglaries, but may also stop anti-social behaviour by youths.
(environmental design) Gated lanes - example of CPTED. How do they work?
In review of 43 studies, Sidebottom et al found gates reduced burglarly rates. Suggest this is for following reasons:
- Provide physical barrier, thus increasing effort required to commit a crime.
- Residents taking responsibility for closing gates increases guardianship and surveillance.
- Offenders no longer use excuse they thought it was a public space.
(environmental design) Gated lanes - example of CPTED. Limitations:
- Don’t work against criminals who live within the gated area.
- In areas where neighbours don’t know/trust each other, residents may be less likely to install gates, or take responsibility for them.
- May be difficulties installing gates if alley is public right of way.
- Gate lanes can restrict emergency services and refuse collectors, which can be a problem.
(environemtnal design) CPTED and theory. Has links with following right realist theory ideas:
- Situational crime prevention (SCP) - involves ‘target hardening’ by changing physical environment to make it harder to commit crime.
- Felson’s routine activity theory - emphasises importance of ‘capable guardian’ protecting potential crime targets. e.g. mutual surveillance by neighbours.
- Rational choice theory - CPTED sees offenders acting rationally e.g. if intruders fear they’ll be challenged by residents, they’re more likely to stay away from the area.
(environmental design) Criticisms of CPTED:
- Focuses on defence from outsaiders who come into the area to offend, but insiders commit crime too.
- CPTED cannot prevent offences that don’t involve physical intrusion into neighbourhood.
- Some housing estates have high crime rates because of councils’ housing allocation policies, not how they are designed.
(environmental design) Panoptican prisons:
- Is type of insitutional building and system of control designed by Jeremy Bentham in 18thC.
- Concept is to allow all prisoners of an institutions to be observed by single security guard without inmates being able to tell whether they’re being watched.
(environmental design) Panoptican prisons: Foucault’s surveillance theory.
Argues that in today’s society, self-surveillance has become an important way of achieving social control. We know we might be being watched, so we monitor and control our behaviour e.g. CCTV cameras.
2) Behavioural Tactics.
Are ways in which agencies of social control can deploy tactics which seek to change an individual’s behaviour.
(behavioural tactics) ASBOs and Criminal Behaviour Orders. What is ASBOs?
- ASBO = anti-social behaviour order issued by magistrates court to prevent crimes.
- ASBO comes in different varieties: ban, curfew, limit or restrict behaviour.
- Puts limit on behaviour.
- Breaching terms could result in anything from a fine, to time in custody.
(behavioural tactics) ASBOs and Criminal Behaviour Orders. What is CBOs?
- Similar to ASBO, but expects something more of offender, which is to encourage them to change their behaviour.
- If offender was displaying anti-social behaviour due to drugs or alcohol, then courts could require them to embark on drug rehabilitation order.
- For younger offenders, courts issue many Education Orders, so prevent them being out on streets causing trouble.