314 - final Flashcards
aging population
- 1956, 2006, 2056 projections
- aging tsunami
- accomplishment
- other factors
- 1956: pyramid (lots at bottom, little at top)
- 2006: fewer ppl being born recently (looks like house)
- 2056 projections: turn into bean pole shape thing (vase shape)
- aging tsunami: there are more seniors (64+) than there are children (0-14)»_space; increased disease incidence in old age (cancer, CVD, etc)»_space; gonna bankrupt the medical system
- it is a societal accomplishment»_space; living longer, healthier lives (reduces burden on healthcare)
- there is WAY too high of a role for sES, age, gender, ethnicity despite the fact that we have a public healthcare system
decline in cognition
- independence
- control
- wellbeing paradox
- ppl want to maintain independence and they dont want to ‘lose it’ »_space; overall trajectory of cog decreases over the age of 60
- perceived control decreases with old age (health challenges, no longer living independently)»_space; personal control can have a powerful effect on health and psychological condition
wellbeing paradox: older adults increase their positive experience with life»_space; low at 30, then increases!»_space; goes well until 4th stage (very old)
- still true even with increasing physical and cognitive decline
models of successful aging
- goals (definition + 3)
- problem
People are active agents that navigate through life by setting and pursuing goals»_space; moving closer to goals is good for your well-being
Goals: cognitive representations of the self in the future
- Guide behavior over time
- individual reference standard
- linked to stress (unable to reach goals) and well-being
Problem: what if health limits goal pursuit → physical in capability → not enough strength
Goal adjustment and well-being
- disengagement and management
- farmer example
- changing themes
- generativity (3)
- symbolic immortality
- disengagement and management → how can they just goal → something challenging and meaningful to pursue without experiencing failure
Eg. farmer aging → must pass on Farm to kids → instead, grow a vegetable garden → gets even older → switch to potted plants → breaking things down into sub goals that are manageable
Let go of goals that are too challenging and ALSO look for an alternative
Goals reflect changing themes of life
Eg. middle-age = work goals, uni = academic goals
older adulthood: generativity ( leaving a legacy/ legacy, contribution)
- guiding the Next Generation
- taking responsibility for well-being of others
- passing on knowledge
symbolic immortality: a sense of continuity of one’s life beyond death»_space; associated with enhanced meaning as people confront their own mortality
the experience corps program
- win-win
- training
- results (6)
- adherance
- International volunteer-based tutoring program to support reading in elementary school-age children
- win-win: fostering literacy skills in disadvantaged children while promoting Health cognitive skills and social engagement and older adult volunteers ( over retirement but still fit)
- even the first trial showed results → older adults and program walk more flights of stairs, walk more overall, watch no TV during work hours (decreased sedentary time and increased physical activity), reduction in falls, more social support (meet others also doing intervention), more self-esteem and executive functioning
- 80% adherence to program (very high!)»_space; more likely to get up and go on a rainy day (aches and pains) to see a cute 9yo (promised to meet) rather than some aerobics class
experience corps intervention:
- primal pathways (3)
- mechanisms (functional, physiological, and cognitive parameters)
- outcomes (5)
primal pathways: physical activity, social engagement, cognitive stimulation
mechanisms:
- functional parameters: inc strength/balance, dec falls
- physiological parameters: dec insulin resistance, dec BP
- cognitive parameters: inc cognitive reserve, changes in brain structure and function
outcomes: physical function (mobility), global function, quality of life, cognitive function, healthcare costs
old age has many faces
- third stage
- fourth stage
- start of decline?
“third” vs “fourth” stage
- “old age” is not a uniform experience»_space; extends over multiple decades
good news: third stage = “young old” (60-85)
- relatively good health and subjective wellbeing
- substantial latent potential and reserve capacities
- effective strategies to attain goals
not-so-good news: fourth stage = “oldest old” (85+)
- sizable losses in cog potential
- inc in chronic disease burden
- sizeable prevalence of dementia and frailty
- social losses
*above age 70, life satisfaction states declining»_space; close to death, life satisfaction declines rapidly
adding life to years
- compression of morbidity (present vs life extension vs compression)
- pushing back chronic disease to reduce time spent under “fourth age” conditions (ill health/impaired quality of life)
- how can we add life to years, rather than years to life
present: early short slope, then death
life extension: long slope, then death»_space; keeping people alive longer is just prolonging the time spent in chronic illness
compression of morbidity: late short slope, then death»_space; want to extend life but also decrease time spent in morbidity (prevention and healthy lifestyles)
how to compress morbidity
- inactivity/obesity
- inflammation association
- society
- healthcare system
- combat inactivity and obesity»_space; if you were obese and completely sedentary, risk of chronic diseases is the same level as someone 12 years older who exceeds physical activity guidelines (significant!! especially in old age «_space;affects age of onset)
- inactivity and obesity lead to inflammation»_space; associated with diabetes, CVD, cancer and diseases affecting the CNS
- society: Manages health care expenditures
- Health care system: Need to focus on prevention
runner study
- age, controls, time period
- research question
- results
- comparing 50+ yo runners with matched controls (matched age, status, gender and health»_space; started at the same place) over 21 yr period
- does phys activity push back chronic disease in midlife sample growing older
- on avg, ppl from runners club developed same disability level (physical/cognitive»_space; unable to walk up stairs/around block, manage their own finances) more than 12 years after community controls (enjoyed better quality of life»_space; advantage became more pronounced over time (21yrs)
*aging is a different process for diff ppl!
Who uses health services?
- health risks, age, gender, sES
- those with health risks (obsesity, high stress)
- age: young (children»_space; vaccinations, checkups) and old»_space; more vulnerable, chronic diseases
- gender: women more likely (pregnancy, childbirth); men less likely to admit to having symptoms
- socioeconomic factors: who can take time off (flexible work schedule»_space; may not seek help if they can’t get time off); indigenous ppl and immigrants use a lot less (low income areas less likely to have a doctor, language barriers)
factors affecting symptom recognition
- age, culture, situation, personality, mood
- age: young adults feel invulnerable
- cultural differences: comfort to bring up issues (eg. talking about private areas)
- situational factors: busy = less aware
- indiv differences in personality: some ppl are more likely to notice symptoms (neuroticism, contentiousness»_space; more likely to be careful if there are people in your family with illness)
- mood:
- positive: less access to illness-related memories
- negative: rumination abt symptoms, perception to be vulnerable to future illness
interpretation of symptoms
- prior experience (2)
- lay referral work
- third one :)
- prior experience: interpretation of a symptom is heavily influenced by prior experiences
- expectations: ignore symptoms that arent expected, amplify symptoms that are
- seriousness of symptoms: more likely to seek treatment if it causes pain - lay referral network: an informal network of family and friends who offer an interpretation of symptoms, give advice on seeking medical attention, remedies, or consulting another lay person
eg. sanctioning = social trigger»_space; someone insists they go get treatment - internet, talk shows (unreliable)
Treatment delay
- definition
- problems (3)
- emotional factors (4)
time between recognition of symptom and obtaining treatment»_space; an indiv is aware of the need to seek treatment but puts off doing so
Problems:
- recognition (should I get checked?)
- decision (im too busy)
- waitlists (Canada has great healthcare but HUGE waitlists»_space; if you need a specialist it could take weeks/months)
emotional factors:
- ppl already depressed tend to delay getting med care»_space; cannot mobilize energy to see it
- ppl more frightened more likely to seek treatment quickly
- if they think treatment will be painful they are less likely
- embarrassment may delay (turns out to be nothing, embarrassing symptoms)
- men believe getting care is a sign of weakness
Delay behaviour
- appraisal delay
- illness delay
- utilization delay
- appraisal delay: (sensory experience) time it takes a person to decide that a symptom is serious (symptom happens over and over again, severity of symptoms)
- illness delay: (thoughts on symptom) time btwn recognizing that a symptom implies an illness (symptom not going away) and the decision to seek treatment
- utilization delay: (benefits and barriers) time btwn deciding to seek treatment and actually receiving appropriate care (waitlists)
treatment non-adherence
- range
- adherence highest for?
- non-adherence highest for? reasons? (2)
- general low regimen adherence (4)
- religion
- non-adherence ranges from 15-93% (avg = 50%)
- adherence highest for HIV, arthritis, cancer, gastro-intestinal diseases (IBS)
- non-adherence highest in pulmonary diseases (eg. COPD), diabetes (can result in blindness from blood clots!) and sleep disorders
- adherence is variable and low in lifestyle change recommendations (stop smoking, change diet, etc)
- ppl may not adhere because of cost, duration of treatment (chronic)
- adherence generally low when the regimen is complex, must be followed for a long time, requires changes in the person’s lifestyle, and is designed to prevent rather than cure illness (eg. diabetes regimens)
- religion: doctors cannot superimpose»_space; must be patient»_space; don’t force, be accommodating but also keep best interests of patients
Factors impacting adherence (8)
- pain (eg. HBP doesn’t have, many cancers dont either)
- perceived seriousness (education factor)
- duration
- age/life phase
- visibility of symptoms
- complexity of treatment (length, dose)
- side effects (approved meds weigh intended and unintended consequences)
- mental health (cognitive decline)
creative/rational non-adherence (5)
involves modifying a prescribed treatment regimen
- patient does not know precisely the consequences of changing meds, confusion about when/how much to take
- patient beliefs and private theories (is there a diff btwn taking 1 or 2 pills? is the illness still there? stop and check)
- don’t have money for refill, forget to take meds
- believe medication isnt helping
- side effects are unpleasant, worrisome or reducing quality of life
antibiotics non-adherence
- used when?
- why non-adherence?
- consequence
- for acute conditions
- prescriptions are usually very clear, but ppl “already felt better” or “had bad side effects” so they stopped early
- sub-optimum antibiotic concentrations»_space; bacteria can become resistant (serious consequences)
patient-provider communication
- unspecific symptom
- medical office and communication (2)
- provider problems (5)
- poor communication (4)
- pain is the most unspecific symptom (80% reason for physician visits)
- the medical office is an unlikely setting for effective communication
- the person who is ill»_space; high temp, hard to articulate, private things
- the provider»_space; time pressure (7 mins per visit), derailed convos, difficult to tell patient, depersonalization, burnout (physical/emotional exhaustion from chronic stress, feeling inadequate), reactance (patient’s angry responses when they feel controlled/lack freedom)
Poor communication: need to give patient time to process diagnosis; wait until they are ready to hear it, have more empathy»_space; patient should bring someone with them for testing (to hear news for them/take notes)
Problems with communication
- jargon (4), not listening, baby talk, stereotypes (2)
- use of jargon»_space; patients dont understand many terms that providers use»_space; may be purposely used to…
- keep patient from asking too many questions
- keep patient from discovering provider is uncertain abt problem
- used as carryover from technical training
- resort to when it is difficult to tell the patient bad news - not listening: both sides»_space; patients are not at their best, don’t listen to doctors questions and just keep repeating the same thing
- baby talk: especially to elders»_space; providers underestimate what patient can understand»_space; undermines self-esteem»_space; can forestall questions
- stereotypes: gender, ethnicity, low SES, older adults, acute vs chronic (chronic requires a relationship»_space; long term)
- easiest to speak with ppl who share something in common with you
eg. hard for young trans asian girl to talk to an old cis white guy
Patient factors
- anxiety
- ESL
- 1/3 of patients cannot repeat diagnosis within minutes of discussing it»_space; anxiety impairs info retention
- ESL»_space; new terms (first time hearing it»_space; should ask for clarification!)
distinguishing symptoms
- pain
- embarrassment
- patients focus on pain»_space; not helpful to distinguish problem/diagnosis»_space; providers concerned with underlying illness
- embarrassment may lead patients to give faulty cues abt health history and practices (eg. broken arm vs hemorrhoids)
social relationships and health
- types of measures (2)
- marital relationship
- social relations matter for health, morbidity, mortality etc
Measures:
- count number of ties ppl have»_space; linked to better outcomes
- focus on quality of exchange/social support effect on stress
marital relationship: stakes in e/o health»_space; first line of defense (social support)»_space; exposed to same stressors (live together)
- “it takes 2 to tango”
- couples dynamics
- change
- indiv
- coordination
- adjustments
- couples dynamics: if one slips, entire dynamic affected
- changes over time (not static)»_space; difficult to learn
- depends on indiv characteristics and how well they work together
- must coordinate»_space; hard»_space; complimentary behav = help them do well as a unit
- even experienced dancers must adjust to health problems (doesn’t mean they stop dancing!)
Marriage and health balance
- dyadic coping
- pooling resources/strategies in partnerships»_space; collaborative problem-solving and dyadic coping (dealing w stressors together)
- stressor is not an isolated experience»_space; impacts others»_space; starts out indiv, then gets transmitted (happens in shared env)
couples coping w chronic diseases
- common elements (6)
- disease specific elements (5)
Common elements:
- wake up call»_space; look at life differently
- stressful»_space; for indiv and close others (can they still play same role in fam?)
- complex adjustments eg. diabetes»_space; can’t be sedentary, must eat healthy
- impacts close others (spouses, fam, friends)»_space; stress abt future
- need support»_space; caregiving
- long duration»_space; significant adjustment
Disease specific elements:
- diabetes, cancer, arthritis»_space; is it life threatening, debilitating, amount of pain, change needed, length (rest of life)?
evidence: couples coping w chronic diseases
- most evidence based on what?
- need what?
- there is research on ____ and ____ but not what?
- almost everything is based on samples of unrelated indiv»_space; ask one spouse abt the other (observations, their thoughts/feelings)»_space; does not take into account both spouses perspectives
- need to observe impact of BOTH patient AND spouse
- theres a lot of research on patient and some on spouse (for appraisal, coping and adjustment), but not a lot on how patient’s ACA AFFECTS spouses and vice versa (not dyadic)
Sample Case: diabetes
- requires
- stress (acute vs chronic)
- non-adherence
Requires:
- glucose control (glucose is dysregulated)
- complex behavioural modifications (life behaviours)
Stress:
- acute stress: life threatening»_space; can lose consciousness (look drunk)
- chronic stress: elevated BS lv = damage nerves, CVD risk, blindness
- stress causes release of cortisol and epinephrine, which decreases insulin production (pancreas) and increases glucose production (liver); body decreases use of glucose
- problem focused coping better for diabetes than emotional focused
Non-adherence: can lead to severe acute/chronic health problems
- encourage patient to change without insulin meds»_space; healthy diet, exercise
spousal involvement in diabetes management
- eating
- help
- 3 types of involvement (which is best? which is worst)
- spousal appreciation
- difficult to do alone»_space; eating is a very social behaviour»_space; roles (groceries, cooking)»_space; bigger struggle without support»_space; spouse needs to know what you can’t eat!
- sometimes spouse does not know how to help patient adhere to diet»_space; just stresses them out
- spousal support: smile, social support, buy healthy foods
- spousal persuasion: motivate (“you cant…” “I need you to…”)
- spousal pressure: criticism (“have you done…”)
- making them feel guilty does not always work»_space; telling them off can make them start cheating the diet/stop listening
- only being supportive worked (compared to other 2)»_space; pressure is a problem (stresses out patient by telling them what they already know is not working)
- spousal appreciation: spouse needs to be looked after as well
- when spouses helped a lot and saw patient smile because they did something for them resulted in positive affect increase (made them feel better)
- may feel negative affect, but being appreciated (positive experiences) can keep them going
diabetes study
- sample size
- assessment (how often assessed, 4 assessments)
- mean age and relationship duration
- measures (3)
- covariates (5)
- 129 couples (one spouse with diabetes)
- repeated daily life assessment (24 days, once a day)»_space; what they and their spouse did, how they felt, if they engaged in health behaviours, wrote diaries (much catch them in the moment to give critique) etc
- mean age @ baseline = 66 yrs, mean relationship duration = 38 yrs, 50% female patients
Measures:
- dietary adherence
- diabetes-specific stress
- diet-specific spousal support, persuasion and pressure
covariates: age, gender, ethnicity, comorbidities, severity of symptoms
Sample Case: prostate cancer
- caused by?
- treatments
- common stressors
- support/coping
- uncontrolled cell proliferation (tumor)
- treatments: surgery, radiation, chemotherapy
- common stressors: incontinence (unable to hold pee), impotence = side effects»_space; related directly to marriage
- spousal support and dyadic coping: benefits patient»_space; huge diff in stress management/treatment
prostate cancer study
- sample size
- mean age/duration
- recruitment
- measures (3 + covariates)
- effect of support (collab vs no collab»_space; negative effect)
- distressed spouse
- 59 couples (one spouse w cancer)
- time sampling (everyday for 2 weeks)
- mean age = 68, mean relp duration: 38 yrs
- recruited within 6mo of diagnosis
Measures:
- number of daily stressors, collaborative coping, positive/negative effect, covariates: age
- working together and supporting each other makes a difference in how the patient does
- when they dont collab, there is a negative affect of husband, wife unrelated
- when they work together/support e/o negative affect is related to e/o»_space; patient does what spouse wants them to do and spouse opens themselves up to negative affect»_space; can take a toll on spouses emotions (vulnerable health)
- spouse may become too distressed (eg. depression) to provide support»_space; affects patient (resources/support)
Sample Case: Arthritis
- definition
- types (osteo, rheumatoid, fibro, gout)
- treatment
study
- sample size
- interview, questionnaires
- mean age/duration
measures:
- report
- CES-D
- covariates
arthritis: musculoskeletal disorders affecting the body’s muscles, joints, and connective tissues near the joints
- rest of life
- need high level of social support
- inc prev 75yo+, more women than men
types of arthritis:
- Osteoarthritis: joints degenerate (wear n tear)»_space; most common
- Rheumatoid arthritis: most serious»_space; inflammation of joints, debilitating pain, depressive symptoms
- Fibromyalgia: pain/stiffness in muscles/soft tissue
- Gout: too much uric acid»_space; circulates in blood and leaves crystalline deposits at joints
treatment:
- anti-inflammatory meds
- maintain weight (every pound lost is 4 pounds off your knee)
- good sleep
Study:
- 133 couples (one spouse w arth)
- interviewed patient AND spouse (feelings, effect on life)
- each partner completed questionnaires 1 year apart
- Mean age = 62, Mean relationship duration = 31 yrs, 73% female patients
Measures: report feelings depressive symptoms, indiv characteristics, etc
- center for Epidemiological studies depression scale (CES-D) «_space;list of symptoms»_space; how often trouble sleeping, feeling down, physical limitations etc
Covariates: age, education, length of marriage, disease duration, employment
RAIDAI
- spousal CES-D prediction
- why
- maladaptive strategies
RAIDAI patient reports: patients report feelings, pain, inflammation of every joint»_space; very nuanced measure
spousal CES-D: spousal depression could predict disease activity a year later»_space; ppl w spouses who had more depressive symptoms did worse in the long term
- sometimes spouse cannot/does not come through»_space; depressed spouses are less likely to provide satisfactory support»_space; they need to focus on themselves so it is harder to engage in coping strategies for patient
- sometimes spouse has maladaptive coping strategies»_space; may even blame the patient
Families coping with chronic disease: Adolescent diabetes (type 1)
- parental control
- switching to autonomy
- young vs teen
- pressure vs responsiveness
- parental involvement in diabetes management»_space; parental control and responsive support
- complex process to switch from parental to indiv management (autonomy)»_space; hard for parent to let go (severe consequences if kid does it wrong!)
- control is good when young, but too much when older can be detrimental
- parents who reported high control (pressure)»_space; their kids did worse for treatment adherence
- parents who are responsive (“I am here for you”)»_space; their kids did best
Group medical visits study
- # patients
- indiv checkups
- quarterly educational sessions (7)
- primary outcomes (6)
- proof of concept
- spousal support
- acute vs chronic
- good for chronic illnesses»_space; 5-6 patients
- check ups are only 8 minutes»_space; hard to apply recommendations in an effective way
- quarterly educational sessions: 1 hour with 6 ppl instead of 8 min indiv»_space; diabetes complications, principles of nutrition, personal habits and lifestyle changes, physical activity, glycemic control, self care, CV aspects
primary outcomes»_space; knowledge of: diabetes, health behaviours, quality of life, body mass, glycosylated hemoglobin, lipids
proof of concept: ppl in group session study did better and had much better knowledge in management, improved health behaviours, know how to deal with situations/circumstances that make adherence hard, etc
- spousal support: bring them to appt»_space; learn health habits needed»_space; patient-doctor relationship also important
- healthcare originally meant for acute treatment»_space; chronic diseases are becoming more prevalent
healthcare spending
- problem
- why
- much higher than expected
- dealing with increased chronic diseases»_space; prevention is important, rather than just management
traditional vs contemporary
traditional view: quality measured in terms of “hard facts”»_space; does not do justice to patient perceptions (psychological consequences ignored)
contemporary view: physical, psychological, vocational and social functioning»_space; addresses additional disease or treatment related outcomes (psychological impact, engagement w others, ability to have a job, etc)
Why study quality of life?
- patient
- morality
- example
- so patient is on board with recommendations of doc
- if theres no diff in mortality between active surveillance and immed treatment, then quality of life should be defining issue
eg. getting dangerous surgery or watching and waiting»_space; if danger is same, depends on patient’s wishes
Emotional responses to chronic illness:
A. denial
- what is it
- effects
- defense mechanism»_space; common early rxn to the diagnosis of chronic illness»_space; serves as a protective fxn
- healthy response»_space; protection from being overwhelmed»_space; slowly digest/take it in
- during treatment/rehab (adherence), denial my have adverse effects»_space; must get passed it before moving on
Emotional responses to chronic illness:
B. anxiety
- very challenging
- common after diagnosis»_space; increases when ppl have to wait a lot (waitlists, referrals), or anticipate substantial changes
Emotional responses to chronic illness:
C. depression
- when the acute phase of chronic illness ends
- full implications sink in»_space; assessing depression is challenging in the context of chronic illness»_space; will have to make big life changes
- can interfere with adherence to treatment
chronic disease challenges
- 2 main challenges
- physical self
- achieving self
- social self
- private self
- self concept
- self esteem
- physical self: body image»_space; perception and evaluation of ones physical functioning
eg. invasive surgery (breast cancer)»_space; lost a boob
- can be restored, but takes time - achieving self: achievement is important to self esteem and self-concept
eg. going out to eat for work»_space; having to watch what you eat is an inconvenience - social self: rebuilding social life (esp when young)»_space; interactions w fam/friends
- fears abt withdrawal of support are common worries of the chronically ill
- indiv w chronic disease often elicit ambivalence from acquaintances»_space; young ppl think their invulnerable, so having someone close with cancer is hard for them»_space; will distance themselves so they don’t have to think about being vulnerable - private self: major threats to self»_space; illness creates a loss of independence (mobility loss, check ups, treatments)»_space; adjustments to chronic illness involves exploring alternative routes to fulfillment
Patient’s beliefs»_space; control over illness
- no control
- smaller goals
- backfire
- if you feel you have no control (even if you do) it can result in depression (no longer in charge of life»_space; sad to let go of things we value)
- important to find what aspects are still doable/controllable»_space; pick smaller, still achievable goals to maintain sense of control»_space; source of satisfaction in same life domain
- can backfire if actual control is low»_space; they waste energy on uncontrollable things»_space; frustration and sadness
chronic illness: positive changes
- challenge in priorities»_space; what is rlly important
- chronically ill ppl and their families render their priorities»_space; find meaning in smaller activities of life
- changes in future time perspective affects social relationships (silver lining!)
Motivational shifts: socioemotional selectivity theory
- perspective changes (3)
- motivational shift in line with anticipated future time horizons»_space; reevaluate what important in life when life expectancy is cut short»_space; how to spend life in an emotionally meaningful way
limited future time perspective
- greater value on emotional meaning
- preference for social interactions w close fam/friends
- appreciation for fragility and value of human life
Heart disease
- stats
- congenital
- arrhythmia
- atherosclerosis
- congestive
- CHD
- symptoms of heart attack (4)
- 2nd leading cause of death, inc risk after 55yo, higher in males
- congenital (from birth) eg. valve/chamber issues
- arrhythmia: abnormal heartbeat
- atherosclerosis: plaques (made of fats/cholesterol buildup) cause narrowing of artery
- congestive heart failure: when heart’s capacity to pump can no longer meet the body’s needs, and the individuals become short of breath with little exertion (lungs become congested w fluid)
- coronary heart disease: narrowing and blocking of coronary arteries»_space; most common heart disease»_space; leads to lack of O2 flow (nourishment to heart)»_space; can lead to angina (heart pain) and heart attack (myocardial infarction = complete blockage of flow to an area of heart»_space; no O2 means area dies)
symptoms of heart attack:
- Uncomfortable pressure, fullness, squeezing, or pain in chest
- Pain/discomfort spreading to the shoulders, neck, jaw, or arms
- Shortness of breath
- Possible lightheadedness, fainting, sweating, or nausea
can acute stress cause heart attack? (4)
yes.
- natural disasters: eg. earthquake»_space; increased hospital admissions for heart attacks/cardiac deaths
- sporting events: increased risk of stroke/heart attack on day team lost (only men)
- 9/11: increased CVD in the 3 years following
- work deadlines, depression, anger (especially for heart attacks)
biological mechanisms of MI
- reliability
- arrhythmia, thrombosis
- symptoms
- methods not entirely reliable»_space; patient may overexaggerate report to find reason for MI
- arrhythmia (caused by fight/flight response»_space; inflammatory»_space; causes plaques to be disrupted and form blood clots (thrombosis) which block flow in heart muscle = MI
- increased BP, heart rate, vasoconstriction (lots of stress on heart)
mental stress and vasoconstriction study
- sample size and disease
- test, measures
- men vs women
- high vs low vc
- low score means?
- 549 patients w stable CHD
- TSST»_space; measured cortisol, vasoconstriction
- men had overall higher vasoconstriction than women
- overall, those w higher vc had significantly higher risk of adverse CV outcomes at 3 yr follow up (including cardiac death, MI, heart failure hospitalization, etc)
- low score = high vc»_space; significantly greater
MI triggers and management
- triggers (6)
- management (8)
triggers: physical exertion, anger, stress/heightened emotion, alcohol, cocaine use, infectious illness
management: exercise, anger management, stress management, coping behaviour therapy, medication, public health awareness, campaigns influenza vaccinations, antibiotic treatment
high risk situations and management
- high risk situations (8)
- management (5)
high risk situations: festivals, public holidays, sporting vents, natural disasters, industrial/transport accidents, terrorist acts, anniversaries, significant dates
management: improve access to defibrillators, inc medical cover, public health awareness programs, emergency care, targeted social support
can sexual activity trigger a heart attack?
- more likely when?
- relativity
- worse when?
- percentages, conditions of occurrence
- cumulative effect
- risk
yes.
heart attack more likely during sex with mistress
- after MI, ppl become fearful of sexual intercourse (can trigger)
- relative risk of having MI during sexual intercourse is about 2.7 times higher compared to not»_space; sexual intercourse accounts for <1% of all MIs
- worse in sedentary vs physically active indiv
- not insignificant, but relatively small»_space; 83-90% are men, and 75% of those were extramarital sex»_space; usually younger partner, unfamiliar setting, excessive food/alc
- stable extramarital affairs predictive of major cardiac event over 4 year period (cumulative effect)
- small samples tho, very small real risk
can you die of a broken heart?
- spouse/close friend, cause of death, exception
- long term
- carrie fisher example
yes.
- when spouse/close friend dies soon after»_space; higher in spouse, of any cause, regardless of what spouse passed from (except for Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s because they persist over several years»_space; as disease progresses, caregiver responsibility increases)
- long term stress will take a toll»_space; won’t have a significant increase in mortality (not a shock to the spouse like an aggressive cancer would be)
- eg. carrie fisher (princess lea)»_space; had heart attack, her mom dies within days of an intracerebral hemorrhage due to hypertension (coincidence?)
Widow(er) deaths
- highest risk time period
- causes of death (3)
- het men
- social support
Highest risk: within 3 months (2x higher in first week)
Widow(er)’s cause of death:
- cancer, CVD (inflammation)
- acute causes (infections/accidents due to not paying attention or not taking care of health)
- chronic illness (diabetes, COPD, colon cancer)»_space; require careful management, but if they are depressed they won’t be taking care of themselves properly
- het men more likely to pass away when wife passes»_space; women often encourage health behaviours»_space; widowed men more affected
- ppl who lack social support more at risk
CVD and depression studies
- type of study, length
- mortality risk (widow vs married; men vs women)
- health marker differences (3)
- 1332 couples
- prospective study (looked at mortality over 3 yrs)
- 593 lost spouse during study period
- risk of mortality in widowed men was significantly higher compared to married men/women AND widowed women»_space; risk of mortality was LOWER in widowed women (health benefit, esp if woman had CVD»_space; able to focus on themselves)
significant differences in a variety of health markers
- lower heart rate variability (variability is a good thing»_space; protective) in bereaved ppl»_space; prognostic for CVD
- higher levels of depression»_space; significantly more likely when bereaved (most obvious»_space; don’t take care of themselves, isolation, lack sleep, less phys activity)
- higher level of inflammatory markers in bereaved
most reported chronic conditions (3)
- private vs collective dwellings
- home care
- arthritis (ostio/rheumatoid)»_space; 45% (more women)
- HBP»_space; 43%
- diabetes»_space; 18% (more men)
* many older adults live with multiple chronic conditions (80% of 71-80yo live with 1+)
- almost all (92%) of 65+yo live in private dwellings (collective dwellings = retirement homes)
- older adults w chronic conditions have greatest need for home care»_space; 40% receiving home care had unmet needs (mobile, fitness and social activities)
Home care/health services (5)
- medical equipment/supplies
- nursing care (eg. dressing changes, meds prep)
- physio/occupational therapy (other healthcare services)
- transportation
- personal/home support (bathing, housekeeping, meal prep)
Reablement
- idea
- definitions
- programs (availability, issues, aspects (5))
- not a new idea (1940s)»_space; improve patients capacities for living as normal a life as possible after disablement
- diff definitions and populations: restorative care, function-focused care, reactivation
programs: available in Australia, Norway, UK and Canada»_space; limited evidence, inconsistent, implementation details lacking»_space; who delivered care, when, how, how much, etc»_space; important for replication and determining effectiveness
- person-centered
- short term or time limited (6-9 weeks)
- home/community setting
- multidisciplinary»_space; inc social connectivity, reduce ongoing support
- function focused, regain life skills, promote independence
Shift from rehab to reablement mindset
- shift from passive to active
- rehab is more home/healthcare services (physical function), while reablement focuses more on biopsychosocial model and reintegration back into usual routines (doing what matters most to them)»_space; re-enabling daily living skills (no accepted official definition)
passive to active:
eg. do not make them a meal, help them make their own
- goals are crucial
- working together on goal attainment
- identify resources
- health provider communication (and other comm!)
health action process approach (HAPA)
- motivation phase
- volition phase
- motivation phase: self efficacy, outcome expectations, risk perception»_space; INTENTION
- volition (action-behaviour) phase: action/coping planning, self-efficacy»_space; HABIT
Behaviour change techniques (BCTs)
- active ingredient
- example
- 1, 2, and 7
- component of intervention designed to alter/redirect causal processes that regulate behaviour, aka “active ingredient”
eg. inc phys activity in older adults
- goals and planning (behavioural contracting): planning when, where, and with who you will perform the activity (action planning)
- feedback and monitoring: track heartrate, steps, sleep, sedentary time (eg. w accelerometer)
- associations: prompts, cues»_space; do squats while brushing teeth
- lower levels of self efficacy/phys activity associated with setting goals, self-monitoring, coping planning and feedback»_space; we don’t know exactly how goals were planned
Physiotherapists
- which BCTs? (2)
asked via online survey what BCTs used to promote activity/adherence to non-treatment phys activity
- goals and planning most freq
- repetition and substitution (graded tasks»_space; slowly inc difficulty)
child poverty
C grade in Canada, esp BC!
- working without adequate pay
- in 2015 18.3% (1% above national avg)
Promoting resilience and growth
- Broaden and Build theory
- the undoing hypothesis
- health psychologists are looking for positive experiences that keep ppl from developing illnesses and ward off adversity
Broaden and build theory:
positive emotions widen ppls outlook on life»_space; broaden attention and thinking, repertoire of declared actions, and inc openness to new experiences»_space; build up reserves of energy and social resources (optimism, ego resilience, mental health) that can be later used to adapt to adversities
the undoing hypothesis: positive emotions serve their adaptive role in stress by “undoing” or reversing the negative impact of stress
waitlist control study on loving - kindness meditation
- sample size
- assessments
- results
- 202 middle-aged adults
- 9 weeks of daily life assessments, 6 meditation sessions
results:
- more daily positive emotions (joy, gratitude, contentment)
- more positive relations and social support, more purpose in life, fewer depressive symptoms, fewer health symptoms after 9 weeks
Giving support during the pandemic
- social support
- providing emotional and tangible support benefits the recipient and it is also associated w elevations in positive affect and social satisfaction in the provider
epigenetics - methylation
over the course of a lifetime, the methylation btwn MZ twins is distinguishable from e/o (start out identical, but change over time»_space; env factors)
Hospital services
- emergency care
- health promotion facilities
- emergency care, diagnostic testing, curative treatment, rehabilitation, and social services
- health promotion facilities (wellness centers/weight loss problems)
Nursing homes
- who needs it, why
- outpatients, why (4)
- problem
relatively long-term medical and personal care, esp if patients or their families cannot provide this care
- older adults»_space; frail/mobility problems»_space; need help in day-to-day activities such as dressing and bathing themselves
- ppl are starting to use outpatient services»_space; cheaper, more convenient for daily living, inc govt funding, technological advances (eg. pacemakers that regulate heartbeat and and insulin pumps that inject on a schedule)
- problem: lacking help from fam/friends, no transportation to check ups