314 - final Flashcards
aging population
- 1956, 2006, 2056 projections
- aging tsunami
- accomplishment
- other factors
- 1956: pyramid (lots at bottom, little at top)
- 2006: fewer ppl being born recently (looks like house)
- 2056 projections: turn into bean pole shape thing (vase shape)
- aging tsunami: there are more seniors (64+) than there are children (0-14)»_space; increased disease incidence in old age (cancer, CVD, etc)»_space; gonna bankrupt the medical system
- it is a societal accomplishment»_space; living longer, healthier lives (reduces burden on healthcare)
- there is WAY too high of a role for sES, age, gender, ethnicity despite the fact that we have a public healthcare system
decline in cognition
- independence
- control
- wellbeing paradox
- ppl want to maintain independence and they dont want to ‘lose it’ »_space; overall trajectory of cog decreases over the age of 60
- perceived control decreases with old age (health challenges, no longer living independently)»_space; personal control can have a powerful effect on health and psychological condition
wellbeing paradox: older adults increase their positive experience with life»_space; low at 30, then increases!»_space; goes well until 4th stage (very old)
- still true even with increasing physical and cognitive decline
models of successful aging
- goals (definition + 3)
- problem
People are active agents that navigate through life by setting and pursuing goals»_space; moving closer to goals is good for your well-being
Goals: cognitive representations of the self in the future
- Guide behavior over time
- individual reference standard
- linked to stress (unable to reach goals) and well-being
Problem: what if health limits goal pursuit → physical in capability → not enough strength
Goal adjustment and well-being
- disengagement and management
- farmer example
- changing themes
- generativity (3)
- symbolic immortality
- disengagement and management → how can they just goal → something challenging and meaningful to pursue without experiencing failure
Eg. farmer aging → must pass on Farm to kids → instead, grow a vegetable garden → gets even older → switch to potted plants → breaking things down into sub goals that are manageable
Let go of goals that are too challenging and ALSO look for an alternative
Goals reflect changing themes of life
Eg. middle-age = work goals, uni = academic goals
older adulthood: generativity ( leaving a legacy/ legacy, contribution)
- guiding the Next Generation
- taking responsibility for well-being of others
- passing on knowledge
symbolic immortality: a sense of continuity of one’s life beyond death»_space; associated with enhanced meaning as people confront their own mortality
the experience corps program
- win-win
- training
- results (6)
- adherance
- International volunteer-based tutoring program to support reading in elementary school-age children
- win-win: fostering literacy skills in disadvantaged children while promoting Health cognitive skills and social engagement and older adult volunteers ( over retirement but still fit)
- even the first trial showed results → older adults and program walk more flights of stairs, walk more overall, watch no TV during work hours (decreased sedentary time and increased physical activity), reduction in falls, more social support (meet others also doing intervention), more self-esteem and executive functioning
- 80% adherence to program (very high!)»_space; more likely to get up and go on a rainy day (aches and pains) to see a cute 9yo (promised to meet) rather than some aerobics class
experience corps intervention:
- primal pathways (3)
- mechanisms (functional, physiological, and cognitive parameters)
- outcomes (5)
primal pathways: physical activity, social engagement, cognitive stimulation
mechanisms:
- functional parameters: inc strength/balance, dec falls
- physiological parameters: dec insulin resistance, dec BP
- cognitive parameters: inc cognitive reserve, changes in brain structure and function
outcomes: physical function (mobility), global function, quality of life, cognitive function, healthcare costs
old age has many faces
- third stage
- fourth stage
- start of decline?
“third” vs “fourth” stage
- “old age” is not a uniform experience»_space; extends over multiple decades
good news: third stage = “young old” (60-85)
- relatively good health and subjective wellbeing
- substantial latent potential and reserve capacities
- effective strategies to attain goals
not-so-good news: fourth stage = “oldest old” (85+)
- sizable losses in cog potential
- inc in chronic disease burden
- sizeable prevalence of dementia and frailty
- social losses
*above age 70, life satisfaction states declining»_space; close to death, life satisfaction declines rapidly
adding life to years
- compression of morbidity (present vs life extension vs compression)
- pushing back chronic disease to reduce time spent under “fourth age” conditions (ill health/impaired quality of life)
- how can we add life to years, rather than years to life
present: early short slope, then death
life extension: long slope, then death»_space; keeping people alive longer is just prolonging the time spent in chronic illness
compression of morbidity: late short slope, then death»_space; want to extend life but also decrease time spent in morbidity (prevention and healthy lifestyles)
how to compress morbidity
- inactivity/obesity
- inflammation association
- society
- healthcare system
- combat inactivity and obesity»_space; if you were obese and completely sedentary, risk of chronic diseases is the same level as someone 12 years older who exceeds physical activity guidelines (significant!! especially in old age «_space;affects age of onset)
- inactivity and obesity lead to inflammation»_space; associated with diabetes, CVD, cancer and diseases affecting the CNS
- society: Manages health care expenditures
- Health care system: Need to focus on prevention
runner study
- age, controls, time period
- research question
- results
- comparing 50+ yo runners with matched controls (matched age, status, gender and health»_space; started at the same place) over 21 yr period
- does phys activity push back chronic disease in midlife sample growing older
- on avg, ppl from runners club developed same disability level (physical/cognitive»_space; unable to walk up stairs/around block, manage their own finances) more than 12 years after community controls (enjoyed better quality of life»_space; advantage became more pronounced over time (21yrs)
*aging is a different process for diff ppl!
Who uses health services?
- health risks, age, gender, sES
- those with health risks (obsesity, high stress)
- age: young (children»_space; vaccinations, checkups) and old»_space; more vulnerable, chronic diseases
- gender: women more likely (pregnancy, childbirth); men less likely to admit to having symptoms
- socioeconomic factors: who can take time off (flexible work schedule»_space; may not seek help if they can’t get time off); indigenous ppl and immigrants use a lot less (low income areas less likely to have a doctor, language barriers)
factors affecting symptom recognition
- age, culture, situation, personality, mood
- age: young adults feel invulnerable
- cultural differences: comfort to bring up issues (eg. talking about private areas)
- situational factors: busy = less aware
- indiv differences in personality: some ppl are more likely to notice symptoms (neuroticism, contentiousness»_space; more likely to be careful if there are people in your family with illness)
- mood:
- positive: less access to illness-related memories
- negative: rumination abt symptoms, perception to be vulnerable to future illness
interpretation of symptoms
- prior experience (2)
- lay referral work
- third one :)
- prior experience: interpretation of a symptom is heavily influenced by prior experiences
- expectations: ignore symptoms that arent expected, amplify symptoms that are
- seriousness of symptoms: more likely to seek treatment if it causes pain - lay referral network: an informal network of family and friends who offer an interpretation of symptoms, give advice on seeking medical attention, remedies, or consulting another lay person
eg. sanctioning = social trigger»_space; someone insists they go get treatment - internet, talk shows (unreliable)
Treatment delay
- definition
- problems (3)
- emotional factors (4)
time between recognition of symptom and obtaining treatment»_space; an indiv is aware of the need to seek treatment but puts off doing so
Problems:
- recognition (should I get checked?)
- decision (im too busy)
- waitlists (Canada has great healthcare but HUGE waitlists»_space; if you need a specialist it could take weeks/months)
emotional factors:
- ppl already depressed tend to delay getting med care»_space; cannot mobilize energy to see it
- ppl more frightened more likely to seek treatment quickly
- if they think treatment will be painful they are less likely
- embarrassment may delay (turns out to be nothing, embarrassing symptoms)
- men believe getting care is a sign of weakness
Delay behaviour
- appraisal delay
- illness delay
- utilization delay
- appraisal delay: (sensory experience) time it takes a person to decide that a symptom is serious (symptom happens over and over again, severity of symptoms)
- illness delay: (thoughts on symptom) time btwn recognizing that a symptom implies an illness (symptom not going away) and the decision to seek treatment
- utilization delay: (benefits and barriers) time btwn deciding to seek treatment and actually receiving appropriate care (waitlists)
treatment non-adherence
- range
- adherence highest for?
- non-adherence highest for? reasons? (2)
- general low regimen adherence (4)
- religion
- non-adherence ranges from 15-93% (avg = 50%)
- adherence highest for HIV, arthritis, cancer, gastro-intestinal diseases (IBS)
- non-adherence highest in pulmonary diseases (eg. COPD), diabetes (can result in blindness from blood clots!) and sleep disorders
- adherence is variable and low in lifestyle change recommendations (stop smoking, change diet, etc)
- ppl may not adhere because of cost, duration of treatment (chronic)
- adherence generally low when the regimen is complex, must be followed for a long time, requires changes in the person’s lifestyle, and is designed to prevent rather than cure illness (eg. diabetes regimens)
- religion: doctors cannot superimpose»_space; must be patient»_space; don’t force, be accommodating but also keep best interests of patients
Factors impacting adherence (8)
- pain (eg. HBP doesn’t have, many cancers dont either)
- perceived seriousness (education factor)
- duration
- age/life phase
- visibility of symptoms
- complexity of treatment (length, dose)
- side effects (approved meds weigh intended and unintended consequences)
- mental health (cognitive decline)
creative/rational non-adherence (5)
involves modifying a prescribed treatment regimen
- patient does not know precisely the consequences of changing meds, confusion about when/how much to take
- patient beliefs and private theories (is there a diff btwn taking 1 or 2 pills? is the illness still there? stop and check)
- don’t have money for refill, forget to take meds
- believe medication isnt helping
- side effects are unpleasant, worrisome or reducing quality of life
antibiotics non-adherence
- used when?
- why non-adherence?
- consequence
- for acute conditions
- prescriptions are usually very clear, but ppl “already felt better” or “had bad side effects” so they stopped early
- sub-optimum antibiotic concentrations»_space; bacteria can become resistant (serious consequences)
patient-provider communication
- unspecific symptom
- medical office and communication (2)
- provider problems (5)
- poor communication (4)
- pain is the most unspecific symptom (80% reason for physician visits)
- the medical office is an unlikely setting for effective communication
- the person who is ill»_space; high temp, hard to articulate, private things
- the provider»_space; time pressure (7 mins per visit), derailed convos, difficult to tell patient, depersonalization, burnout (physical/emotional exhaustion from chronic stress, feeling inadequate), reactance (patient’s angry responses when they feel controlled/lack freedom)
Poor communication: need to give patient time to process diagnosis; wait until they are ready to hear it, have more empathy»_space; patient should bring someone with them for testing (to hear news for them/take notes)
Problems with communication
- jargon (4), not listening, baby talk, stereotypes (2)
- use of jargon»_space; patients dont understand many terms that providers use»_space; may be purposely used to…
- keep patient from asking too many questions
- keep patient from discovering provider is uncertain abt problem
- used as carryover from technical training
- resort to when it is difficult to tell the patient bad news - not listening: both sides»_space; patients are not at their best, don’t listen to doctors questions and just keep repeating the same thing
- baby talk: especially to elders»_space; providers underestimate what patient can understand»_space; undermines self-esteem»_space; can forestall questions
- stereotypes: gender, ethnicity, low SES, older adults, acute vs chronic (chronic requires a relationship»_space; long term)
- easiest to speak with ppl who share something in common with you
eg. hard for young trans asian girl to talk to an old cis white guy
Patient factors
- anxiety
- ESL
- 1/3 of patients cannot repeat diagnosis within minutes of discussing it»_space; anxiety impairs info retention
- ESL»_space; new terms (first time hearing it»_space; should ask for clarification!)
distinguishing symptoms
- pain
- embarrassment
- patients focus on pain»_space; not helpful to distinguish problem/diagnosis»_space; providers concerned with underlying illness
- embarrassment may lead patients to give faulty cues abt health history and practices (eg. broken arm vs hemorrhoids)
social relationships and health
- types of measures (2)
- marital relationship
- social relations matter for health, morbidity, mortality etc
Measures:
- count number of ties ppl have»_space; linked to better outcomes
- focus on quality of exchange/social support effect on stress
marital relationship: stakes in e/o health»_space; first line of defense (social support)»_space; exposed to same stressors (live together)