(3.1) Functionalism: Subcultural Theory - Cohen Flashcards
What two areas does the subcultural theory focus on?
- non-utilitarian crime
- group crime
Who was the first sociologist to use subcultural theory to explain deviance?
Cohen
What are Cohen’s two main criticisms of Merton’s work?
- believes Merton’s work is highly plausible for explaining some crimes but it fails to account for innovative non-utilitarian crimes
- Cohen argues that much deviance is committed collectively in a group/ gang rather than individually and Merton doesn’t account for this
Show how Cohen explains why young working class males suffer from status frustration
- initially accept wider social and cultural goals
- become increasingly aware of inability to achieve goals via legitimate means
- inability explained by position in social structure
- cultural deprivation accounts for lack of educational success
- consequently often labelled and found in lower streams - denying status and success
- stuck at bottom of system, blocked opportunities for success, branded as failures
- leads to status frustration
How does Cohen explain that they resolve their frustration?
- by rejecting the success goals of mainstream society
Although gang delinquency is seemingly irrational and destructive, what does Cohen argue?
- gang delinquency is indicative of a reversal of acceptable forms of behaviour ie. rudeness, violence, vandalism, malicious
- all are condemned in society but are elevated to a central position in the subculture
What function does Cohen see the subculture as serving?
- as a reaction-formation to status frustration
- a means of hitting back at a mc society that has condemned them to failure
In conclusion, how does Cohen explain deviance?
- a consequence of pressure from the social structure (taken from Merton’s ideas)
- reinforced from the subculture
Identify a strength of Cohen’s theory about how it has developed Merton’s theory
- he contributes points that are applicable for non-utilitarian crime, whereas Merton only focuses on the pressures people face to gain money
Identify an assumption about the working class that they both make
- the wc are at a disadvantage for success eg. money or in education
- both argue inequalities in opportunities cause crime
What evidence is there that Cohen is generalised about wc males?
- many are hard-working and achieve well in school/ apprenticeships etc.
Does every wc boy suffer status frustration?
- no, many accept and are satisfied in their status and so don’t experience frustration when they can’t gain mc status
Does Cohen focus too heavily on education?
- yes, there are numerous other reasons why wc boys commit crime/ become part of a delinquent subculture eg. boredom, lack of male role model - which Cohen doesn’t discuss
Does Cohen focus too heavily on the crimes of wc boys?
- yes, doesn’t explain crimes of older, younger, female - BUT actually at the time it was considered that males had the monopoly on crime so it is understandable
Are wc boys always stuck in lower sets?
- actually, a lot of teachers/ schools encourage/ help wc pupils so they can move up into higher band - lower band doesn’t remove all chance for success