3. The exclusion of Catholics from religious toleration Flashcards
The Toleration Act of 1650
- Removed the requirements to atoned an Anglican Church - but Catholics were still not given freedom
- 1640s - had been the key decade in the development of tolerationist ideas - grounded in radical Puritanism
Roger Williams
Puritan theologian
1644 - opened the debate when his call for toleration included embracing heretics, blasphemers, Catholics and pagans - thought most Puritans disagreed w/ his view
Laws against Catholics after 1640
First explicit law passed by the Long Parliament in Aug 1643
- Required all Catholics aged over 21 to swear an Oath of Abjuration denying their basic beliefs
- Refusal meant confiscation of 2/3 of their land and goods
- Catholics - also forced to pay the assessment tax at twice the normal rate
- The Oath reissued in 1656 - stricter terms and a call to close down Catholic chapels in foreign embassies - with a fine of £100 for those caught
Catholics’ estates
Many had them confiscated after the Civil War - some left w/ no option but to conform
Calls for religious freedom for Catholics
1652 - Henry Vale - wrote a pamphlet calling for religious freedom for Catholics - stated he wouldn’t extend to idolaters
- Most calls for sustained Catholic persecution cite the use of states and reverence of saints as a primary reason for their continued actions
Cromwell issued an order in Jan 1654
- Stating that the laws against Catholics enacted under Elizabeth I and James I were to continue.
- Leading Catholics met w/ Cromwell to try and change his mind
Cromwell - proclamation in April 1655
Demanding that the laws against Catholic influence in the priesthood be adhered to.
September 1655 - report sent to Cromwell
Stated that 992 people refused to take Oath of Abjuration in Lancashire - far more than in any other country.
How enforced were these anti-Catholic laws?
- Many reports of the authorities turning a blind eye to many practices
Sir Kenelm Digby
A leading Catholic in the household of the exiled Henrietta Maria - friendly with Cromwell
- Visited London in 1654 - able to secure release of his family’s confiscated property
Why wasn’t the problem of Catholic influence not the major focus of the political battles and religious tensions that dominated?
- If Catholics remained discreet - were able to worship privately
- The Irish Catholics endured a further invasion in 1649 - but the fighting was mainly between parliamentary and royalist armies
- Despite the massacres at Drogheda and Wexford - evidence of local records shows very few civilian deaths
Restoration - Catholics in England
- In England - gained a measure of safety, in some cases a reward for faithful service - also a measure of religious freedom because there were other more immediate targets
Restoration - Scotland
- Situation similar to England - with restored parliament dominated by nobility and concerned to restrict the power of the Kirk and suppress dissenters
Restoration - Ireland
- Ireland overseen by a governor and the Church of Ireland restored
- Led to persecution of Catholics and dissenters w/ variable consistency