3 Special Duty Of Care Flashcards

0
Q

Psychiatric injury - primary victims

A

Def. claimant who is put in danger of physical harm but only suffers psychological injury

Page v Smith
Once duty of care to prevent personal injury is owed to claimant, it does not matter what kind of injury occurs.

McFarlane v EE Caledonia ltd
Claimant was not in any real danger, therefore no primary victim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Psychiatric injury - rules

A
  1. Alock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire
    Recognized form of psychiatric injury
  2. Sion v Hampstead Health Authority
    Psychiatric injury must be result of sudden event or its immediate aftermath and must be foreseeable
  3. Differences between primary and secondary victims
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Psychiatric injury - secondary victims

Requirements

A

Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire

  1. A close tie of love and affection to a primary victim
    McLoughlin v O’Brian
    Bourhill v Young
  2. Witness of the event with the claimants own unaided senses
  3. Proximity to the event or its immediate aftermath
  4. The psychiatric injury must be caused by a shocking event
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Psychiatric injury - rescuers

A
  1. Chadwick v British Railways Board

Duty of care is being owed if it is foreseeable that people will try to help and rescue

  1. White v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire
    No duty of care for police officers helping
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Pure economic loss

A

Hedley Bryne principle

  1. Special skill
    Mutual life & Citizens Assurance Co v Evatt
  2. Reasonable reliance
    Hedley Bryne & Co v Heller & Partners ltd
  3. Voluntary assumption of responsibility
    Giving advice without disclaimer amounts to accept liability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Product liability - case law

A

Test for defectiveness (Consumer Protection Act 1987, s1(2)
Legitimate expectations of general public, not the standard of reasonable care

A v National Blood Authority
Blood transfusion can be expected to be free of contamination

Worsley v Tambrands ltd
Short warnings and cross reference to health advice are sufficient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Vicarious liability - who is employee tests

A
  1. Control test
  2. Integration test
    Stevenson Jordan v Macdonald & Evans
  3. The economic reality test
    Ready Mixed Concrete ltd v Minister of Pensions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Vicarious liability - tort commited in course of employment

A

Twine v Bean’s Express ltd
Express prohibition - not liable because no benefit to employer

Frolics of one’s own
Storey v Ashton

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly