3. Incorporation and corporate personality Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is a promoter?

A

Promoter is a fiduciary.
Duties: Loyalty and Good faith
Someone who engages in business operations by which a company is brought into existence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How does s.51 of CA2006 differ to the common law rules relating to pre-incorporation contract?

A

S51 of CA2006 states that the promoter is personally bound to contract.
Under common law, whether the promoter was bound to pre-incorporation contract would depend on the intention of the parties as evidenced in contracts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How can a company be bound by a pre-incorporation contract?

A

The company can be bound in 2 ways:

  • Pre-inc contract contain a term, which provides that upon incorporation the promoter will cease to be liable under the contract (if the terms of the contract are the same as the pre-inc contract).
  • Novation contract - Following incorporation, the company, the promoter and third party enter into an agreement that which provides that the pre-inc contract will be discharged, and a new agreement will be entered into (novation).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When will a pre-incorporation contract not be a subject to s.51 of the CA2006?

A

s51 does not apply if:

  • Company bought off the shelf, but was in the existence when the contract was entered into.
  • the Co once existed, but has since been dissolved.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What doc must be submitted to Companies House to incorporate a company by registration?

A

Memorandum of association
Application for registration (IN01)
Statement of compliance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What info does IN01 require?

A

IN01 must have:
Public or private co
limited or unlimited
name
registered address
if there is share capital - a statement of capital and initial shareholdings
- if co is limited by guarantee - a statement of guarantee
- a statement of the officers
- a statement of significant control
- a copy of Articles
- type of co and intended business activities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is off-the-shelf com and what are the advantages?

A

When agents register the com and leave it dormant until it’s purchased
Upon incorporation, the agent will inform the CHouse of the relevant changes (change of directors, registered office and so on).
Benefits: the promoter does not need to incorporate the co, quick and inexpensive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Corporate personality

A
Corporate personality - company is a PERSON
Unincorporated structures are not persons (sole traders and partnerships)
Key consequences:
HAS NATIONALITY, DOMICILE, RESIDENCE
PERPETUAL SUCCESSSION
CONTRACTUAL CAPACITY
OWNERSHIP OF ASSETS
CAN UNDERTAKE OWN BUSINESS
CAN CREATE OTHER BUSINESS STRUCTURES
CAN SUE AND BE SUED
HAVE HUMAN RIGHTS

Lee v Lee Farming Ltd
Christina v Seear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Why Salomon is considered a seminal case?

A

Co can be used to shield members’ assets from liability
Recognised validity of one-person company
The fact that Persons holding shares is not enough to establish a relationship of agency or trusteeship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When will the court disregard a company’s corporate personality?

A

The court will pierce the veil:

  • when provided by statute
  • where a person is under the existing legal obligation which they deliberately evade or whose enforcement they deliberately frustrate by interposing a company under their control, and all other remedies proved to be of no assistance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the 3 conditions for the evasion principle to apply?

A
  • An existing legal obligation is placed upon a person X
  • X interposes a company in order to evade or frustrate the obligation or liability
  • The company being interposed is under the X’s control.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Corporate liability

A
4 forms:
Personal liability
Civil liability
Strict liability - all that needs to be established that prohibited act was engaged in 
Vicarious liability
Attribution
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does the case of Erlanger provide?

A

Phosphate sued Erlanger for recession due to non-disclosure and an account of profits (sold the lease for double the price to Phosphate co). Board had ratified the sale because the board was not independent.

Issues
Was Erlanger liable to Phosphate due to not disclosing to his conflict of interest?

Decision
Erlanger was a promoter for Phosphate. The House of Lords unanimously held that the relationship between a promoter and a newly formed company attracts a fiduciary relationship.

A promoter owes duties of good faith and honesty to the company.
Erlanger should have declared any conflicting interests to the company promoted and cannot make any “secret profits”.

A promoter who breaches any duty to the company by failing to disclose to the company conflicting interests would be liable. The company is able to seek remedies such as rescission of contract and recovery of profits.
A constructive trust can also be formed for the profits gained by the promoter in breach of his or her duties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Trading certificate

What are penalties trading without trading certificate?

A

Liable to fine

Court may grant a liquidation order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the advantages of being a Company as Distinct from Partnership?

A
1. Separate legal identity
2 Limited liability
3 Perpetual existence
4. Raising finance 
i. secure debt by way of floating charge
ii. invite the public to subscribe for shares (plc)
5. Ownership of property
6. Transfer of interest

Disadvantages

  1. Legal implications
    i. formation
    ii. audit
    iii. share issues
    iv. meetings and resolutions
    v. liquidation
    vii. proper accounting records
  2. Expense
  3. Publicity and disclosure
    i. Details of remuneration
    ii. Business details
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Lifting the Veil: what are the seminal cases in disregarding the corporate personality?

A
Gilford Motor Co v Horne 
(the company was a sham)
Daimler v Continental Tyre
Ebrahimi - (2 people in partnership, converted to limited co to save on tax, "Quasi-Partnership company") 
R v Oll
Re F G Films
DHN
17
Q

In what other circumstances the veil can be lifted under the provisions of statute?

A

Fraudulent trading
Wrongful trading
Commencing to trade without a trading certificate
Abuse of company name - (when co goes into insolvent liquidation)

Also, in the following circumstances:
Preparation of group accounts
Tax law
Personal guarantees

18
Q

What is the significance of Petrodel v Prest in “piercing the corporate veil’?

A

The leading current authority on piercing the veil is that of the Supreme Court in Petrodel

The case concerns the distribution of assets in a divorce settlement and as the court found that the assets concerned were held on trust for the
claimant spouse, there was no need for the court to pierce the corporate veil in this case.

However the judgment does contain clear guidelines (albeit obiter) on when a company’s corporate personality may be disregarded. The guidelines are very restrictive. Lord Sumption explains that the only instance when the courts can disregard a company’s
corporate personality is where the ‘evasion principle’ applies. This is where “a person is under an existing legal obligation or liability or subject to an existing legal restriction which he deliberately evades or whose enforcement he deliberately frustrates by interposing a
company under his control”.

He also explains that piercing the veil is a remedy of last resort and should not be used unless no other means exists to reach the required outcome.

Although the Justices in Prest were not unanimous in their views on disregarding corporate personality, subsequent decisions such as that in Wood v Baker [2015] indicate that the
restrictive approach endorsed by Lord Sumption is likely to be followed in the future.

19
Q

Case law in pre-incorporation contracts

A

Agent cannot bind non-existent principle.
Agent is liable if: agent signed “on behalf of” company
BUT: if signature/company name then not liable

20
Q

What are the 2 penalties for contravening s.761 CA2006?

A

o

21
Q

What is the key issue in Baker v Wood case?

A

Used Concealment Principle to disregard corporate personality.

22
Q

What is the key finding in Chandler v Cape Industries?

A

A veil is pierced as last resort, once all other remedies are exhausted

23
Q

Guilford Motor Company v Horne

A

The veil was pierced because the company was ‘sham”

24
Q

What is the concealment principle?

A

The Concealment Principle is where a corporate structure is put in place to conceal a liable person’s identity. The veil is not ‘pierced’.

25
Q

Under what statutes can the veil be pierced?

A

Piercing veil under statute
Companies Act 2006, s. 767(3)
Fraudulent or wrongful trading

26
Q

When can a veil be pierced under contract?

A

This often occurs where creditors lend money to smaller companies. Such creditors will often seek to ensure repayment of the loan by requiring the directors or members (who are often the same persons) to guarantee the loan.