3. Decision-Making Under Risk Flashcards
Expected Value
Probability-weighted average of the payoffs associated with all possible outcomes.
- E(X) = Pr1X1 + Pr2X2 … etc
- Choices with the same expected value may involve different degrees of volatility (measured by variance or s.d.)
Expected Utility Theory
Individuals aim to maximise expected utility
- E(u) = Pr1.u(X1) .. etc -> sum of the utilities associated with all possible outcomes, weighted by prob. of occurance.
- Accept the gamble if EU of gamble is ^ than certain utility if not accepted.
Risk Averse Person
Dislikes risks, preference of certainty over uncertainty with same expected value
Graph:
- Utility Function is concave = decreasing marginal utility of income
- MU of income measures change in TU as income increases = measure of the slope
Risk Loving Person
Prefers uncertainty with the same expected income over a certain one.
Graph:
- Convex = increasing MU of income
Risk Neutral Person
Indifferent to a fair gamble
Graph:
- Straight line = constant MU of income
Demand for Insurance
Insurance Markets provide 1 mechanisms for individuals to share risks = reducing individual exposure to risk
Reservation Price for Insurance
Max. someone would pay for insurance as a consumer
Certainty Equivalent Value (of a gamble)
Sum of money for which an individual is indifferent between receiving that sum or taking a gamble
Risk Premium
Difference between expected value of a lottery and a payoff of a sure thing that would make the individual indifferent between the lottery and the sure thing
Loss Aversion
Individuals treat gains and losses differently in their decision-making
- more sensitive to losses > a gain of the same amount
Framing effects
Individuals are influenced by the way the options are framed
Reference Dependence
Individuals evaluate alternatives without using UF but instead VF that is defined over changes in wealth
- individuals are sensitive to changes in wealth > absolute wealth
Diminishing Sensitivity
Value function is concave in gains and convex in losses
The Allais Paradox
Goes against the Expected Utility Theory
- people favour certainty over probabilistic outcomes even if its inconsistent with decision making