3 - Cognition And Development Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What did Piaget believe?

A

That the difference between adults and children in terms of cognition is not just that ‘adults know more’ because we learn as we grow.
He believed that the reason cognition is so different is as a result of thinking differently. He suggested that cognitive development is a result of two things: maturation and environment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

State and define the 2 things that Piaget suggested cognitive development is a result of?

A

Maturation - the effects of the biological process of ageing and how someone processes become more processed to us as we grow.
Environment - interaction of the environment leads us to understand the world more complexly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define schema.

What are the 2 types of schema? Explain them.

A

Cognitive frameworks which we create through experiences to help us to represent concepts and allowers to understand how to act and behave and what to expect in new and familiar situations.
Behavioural - a schema that leads to an action.
Cognitive - a schema where you are aware of you surroundings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What few, basic schemas are babies believed to already have?
What then happens to babies over time?
How do babies do this?
How do schemas become more complex?

A

Ability to grasp objects.
Distinguishing of the human face from other objects.
They develop and extend schemas and create new schemes.
They learn new schemas and alter existing schemas through experiences formed over time.
Through processes of assimilation and accommodation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define accomodation

A

A form of learning that takes place when we acquire new information that changes our understanding of the topic to the extent that we need to form one or more new schemas and/or radically change existing schemas in order to deal with a new understanding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define assimilation

A

A form of learning that takes place when we acquire new information.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define equilibration

A

Encountering new information and building it into the understanding of the topic through assimilation or accommodation. Everything is again balanced, and we have escaped the unpleasant sensation associated with the lack of balance (disequilibrium).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Evaluate Piaget’s theory of cognitive development

A

+ application - transformed education into more activity-orientated classrooms that are more engaging. Often includes physical properties at a young age as supposed to A-levels which is more independent learning. Curriculum, exploratory play.
+ evidence - Frantz (‘61) infants as young as 4 days old show a preference for a schematic rather than jumbled up features of a face. This has been replicated in several studies, such as Goren et al (‘75), although insure if it’s just a liking for symmetrical things. They recognise their own species and elicit attachment - validity.
+ nature vs nurture. Nature = maturation, innate schema. Nurture = environment. Comprehensiveness increases validity.
- reductionist. Shows the importance of learning socially. Vygotsky - role of experts (MKO). Validity.
- culture bias - he studied a western society, causing ethnocentrism and imposed etic - generalisability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Piaget’s stages of intellectual development consists of how many stages?
Name them in order.

A
4
Sensorimotor stage.
Pre-operational stage.
Concrete operational stage.
Formal operational stage.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain the sensorimotor stage

A

Stage 1 of Piaget’s stages of intellectual development.
0-2 years. The first intellectual stage.
Key features include the development of ‘object permanence’ - the understanding that objects and people do still exist even when they can’t be seen. This develops at approximately 8 months.
The A not B error also happens here.
Children learn to coordinate sensory thinking, rely on appearance rather than reality.
‘Circular reactions’ describes the repetition of actions to test sensorimotor relationships.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain the A not B error

A

If a mother hides a toy underneath mat A the baby will look under mat A and find it. After several times of doing this they then put it under mat B. The kid then still looks under mat A. Lol dumb bitch.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain the pre-operational stage

A

Stage 2 of Piaget’s stages of intellectual development.
2-7 years old. He uses the word operation to explain the cognitive processes children use. They are egocentric.
Children’s logic can’t be used to explain how things work in the real world - eg: they believe most things are ‘alive’ like their teddy or a table.
They can’t preform logical reasoning and heavily rely on what they see ie. they rely on the appearance of things rather than their reality. Gibs is due to a lack of logical thinking.
Children cannot identify smaller groups contained in a larger category (class inclusion).
This is where the 3 mountains task and conservation of volume experiments occur.
Conservation is the most important achievement at this stage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain the concrete operational stage

A

Stage 3 of Piaget’s stages of intellectual development.
7-11 years. A chilled stage. They have developed the ability to use logic at this stage, however they lack abstract thinking and reasoning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explain the formal operational stage

A

Stage 4 of Piaget’s stages of intellectual development.
11+ years. It can take a much longer time to adapt ourselves to abstract thinking. Some people never completely master abstract thinking. Tests allow people to use deductive reasoning, which requires us to draw conclusions based on reason. This stage allows us to think more like scientists. This stage is also linked to our development of ‘idealistic thinking’. Meaning we can use our imaginations to think of how things might be if we were going to make changes etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain the conservation of volume experiment

A

Three beakers are placed in front of a child, beaker A and B were identical. C is taller and skinnier. They asked the child which of A and B has more water. They said the same. They then pour all of the water from B in to see and asked the same question. The kids then respond C

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explain the 3 mountains task

A

There was a model of three mountains, one big and too small. They made the child sit whenever they walked around it. They then placed a door on the mountain somewhere in different positions. The child was then shown 10 pictures of the mountain from various positions. They were asked which photo the doll would see. The kid says their own perspective.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Explain Piaget’s concept of class inclusion

A
This is an advanced classification skill in which we recognise that classes of objects have subsets and are themselves subsets of larger classes. Pre-operational children usually struggle to place things in more than one class.
Piaget and Inhelder (‘64) found that children under 7 struggle with more advanced skills of class inclusion.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Evaluate Piaget’s stages of intellectual development

A
  • culture bias - Piaget placed considerable value on the role of logical thinking because he was from middle-class Europe. His studies involved academics children and families who values academia. Other cultures and social classes may focus on different values. Therefore, his theory may not be generalised/population validity.
  • flawed methodology - The design of many experiments may have confused younger children in particular; this may explain why they appeared less capable. Eg: McGarrigle and Donaldson (‘74) found demand characteristics in conversion task due to deliberate transformation, demanding an alternative response to the 2nd question. Hughes (‘75) found that young kids cope more with egocentrism if it’s more realistic. ie. if asked the perspective of a police officer rather than a teddy. Piaget didn’t test everyday egocentrism - internal validity/mundane realism.
    + application - Piaget: ‘certain concepts should be taught at certain ages.’ If they’re not mature enough, they’ll acquire skills superficially. The Plowden report (‘67) changed primary education based on this. However, this only works if it’s only biology, and not individual maturity, as not amount of practice would help this.
    + the idea of biologically driven stages is correct - The evidence supports the view that they’re qualitative changes in cognitive development as a child matures. Critics use it to rigidly; supporters suggest it’s a useful model for understanding behaviour and generating research. Consistent evidence = reliability. Increase accuracy = validity.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What did Vygotsky believe?

A

There is a qualitative difference in children’s cognition as they grow and that the main reason for this was cultured.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What did Vygotsky argue are the key driving force for the development of cognition?
What is ability a result of?

A

Influences within our culture are the key driving force for the development of cognition, and ability is a result of social contexts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What are elementary functions?
Give examples.
Give examples of higher mental functions.
How do elementary functions turn to higher mental functions?

A

Innate, biological functions.
Eg: perception and memory.
Eg: mathematical ability.
Cultural influence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is said that part of your learning process stems from?

Explain this.

A

The role of experts.
People who are better or more capable of doing a task and can assist in learning a skill.
This suggests that as children we are constantly learning from other people in our environment, usually from more knowledgable others (MKO’s). Eg: parents, teachers, siblings, friends.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is language also known as?
What does the language or (_) involved in communication allow?
How does this happen?

A

Semiotics.
They allow children to develop intellectually.
Dialogue between parent and child (pre-intellectual speech) starts off the basis of learning, and as children develop and grow, they learn internal dialogue to discuss with themselves in order to resolve problems.
Dialogue begins basic but becomes more complex.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

State the 5 parts of Vygotsky’s theory

A
Elementary and higher mental functions
The role of experts
The role of language
Zone of proximal development
Scaffolding
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What is the zone of proximal development?

A

The region between a child’s ‘current’ abilities and tasks they can’t perform.
It focuses in on a ‘zone’ in which a child can learn information.
This child can do all of the tasks in the centre, but the child cannot really reach the outer layer as it is beyond that child’s ability.
However, the middle rind is the ZPD which suggests a child is able to learn in this ‘zone’ with a little help and guidance (scaffolding) when needed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Explain scaffolding

A

Support given to the child, usually by the MKO, but only when really necessary. This can be taken away once the child is capable. Process of helping a learner cross the zone of proximal development and advance as much as they can.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Explain the role of language

A

The way in which we communicate will influence the learning process. Children over time develop the ability to use internal dialogue to help solve problems.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Give examples of both elementary and higher mental functions

A

Elementary - functions such as perception and memory.

Higher mental - functions such as mathematical ability and logic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Compare Vygotsky and Piaget

A

Similarities:
Both believed that social interaction played a vital role in cognitive development.
Differences:
Piaget - cognitive development is influenced by social transmission.
Vygotsky - social interaction heavily influenced thoughts and languages.
Piaget - there are 4 cognitive development stages.
Vygotsky - strong connection between development of thinking and learning language.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Evaluate Vygotsky’s theory of cognitive development

A

+ clear evidence - Roazzi and Bryant. 4 year olds with sweets in a jar are on their own or with an older child. They had to estimate the number of sweets. Those with older child gave better estimations. They offered prompts. Supports - role of experts, ZPD, scaffolding - reliability.
- he overplayed social environment importance. If only social input was needed to advance cognitive development then learning would be a lot faster. Emphasis on social factors means biological ones ignored. Lacks detail coz he died so young - internal validity.
+ application - education. The ideas that children can learn more and faster with appropriate expectations has raised expectations of what they can achieve. Group work, peer tutoring and independent teacher assistance is scaffolding for ZPD.
- individual differences in social interactions. People can be introverts and extroverts - internal validity - extraneous variables.
+ less culturally biased. Accounts for the idea that people learn differently by culture - generalisability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Who developed the 5 stages of scaffolding?

A

Wood, Bruner and Ross (1976)

32
Q

What is scaffolding sometimes also known as?

A

The Vygotsky-Bruner model

33
Q

State and explain the 5 aspects of scaffolding

A

Recruitment - engaging the child’s interest in the task.
Reduction of degrees of freedom - focusing on the child on the task and where to start with solving it.
Direction maintenance - encouraging the child in order to help them to stay motivated and continue trying to complete the task.
Marking critical features - highlighting the most important part of the task.
Demonstration - showing the child how to do aspects of the task.

34
Q

State Wood et al’s 5 levels of prompts from 5 to 1.
Which end is most useful?
Which end is least useful?
What are these levels?

A
5 - demonstration - most helpful.
4 - preparation for child.
3 - indication of materials.
2 - specific verbal instructions.
1 - general prompts - least helpful.
They are particular strategies experts use when scaffolding.
35
Q

Define violation of expectation

A

And approach to investigating how infants understand the world. If a child understands how the physical world operates they will have expectations about the situation. If these expectations are not met, children will react accordingly eg: surprised.

36
Q

What was the aim of Baillargeon’s study?

A

To investigate to see if violation of expectation occurs in early months than that of Piaget’s suggested 8 months to 9 months for object permanence.

37
Q

Explain Baillargeon’s method

A

24 infants aged 5 to 6 months old were shown possible and impossible events. At all bunny rabbit or a short bunny rabbit past behind a screen with a window. The tall bunny rabbit should be visible however was made not to be.

38
Q

Explain Baillargeon’s results

A

33.07 seconds was spent looking at the impossible event compare to 25.11 seconds in the possible condition. The duration of time was interpreted as surprise if they looked longer.

39
Q

Explain Baillargeon’s conclusion

A

This demonstrates an understanding of object permanence at an earlier age (5 to 6 months).

40
Q

What does Baillargeon suggest?

When did she propose this?

A

We are born with an innate physical reasoning system (PRS).
We have a primitive understanding of physical world properties.
We are able to develop more detailed understanding over time through experience.
From birth we have an understanding of object permanence/persistence (objects exist and do not alter structure).
Infants identify event categories very early on in life, such as occlusion (blocking one object from view with another).
Therefore, 5-6 month olds have a very good understanding.
2012.

41
Q

Evaluate Baillargeon’s early infant ability

A

+ carefully controlled research. Less biased sample than Piaget, higher population validity. Used birth announcements in the paper. Parents were asked to keep their eyes shut and not interact with the baby so they don’t unconsciously interact with it. This is a double-blind experiment. Two observers didn’t know if the event was possible or impossible - internal validity.

  • low internal validity of violation of expectation method. Does it actually measure V.O.E? They may look longer at impossible events because they are more interfering, not that it violates their V.O.E. We also can’t track their specific gaze.
  • her research is based on the notion of innate mechanisms driving development, not the capabilities of babies who have different experiences (cultures). If research show differences related to experience, this would challenge Baillargeon. Experience would have a greater role on development of mechanisms than expected - internal validity.
  • nature versus nurture. Piaget has a very good balance between nature and nurture. However, Baillargeon, by showing that object permanence develops far earlier than expected, moves the balance towards the nature side of the debate - consistency, reliability.
42
Q

Define egocentrism

A

The Childs tendency to only be able to see the world from their own point of view. This is both physically and during arguments.

43
Q

What was the aim of Selman’s research?

Who were the participants?

A

To investigate changes that occur with age in children’s responses to scenarios in which they are asked to take the role of different people in a social situation.
30 boys and 30 girls. 20 were 4, 20 were 5 and 20 were 6.

44
Q

Explain Selman’s method.

What were the findings?

A

Each child was individually given a task designed to measure role taking ability. It involves how each person felt in different scenarios. Eg: Holly said she won’t climb trees anymore. Her friends cat gets stuck up a tree. How would they feel if Holly did or didn’t climb the tree to rescue the cat?
Different distinct levels of rotating well identified. Level correlated with age.

45
Q

State Selman’s stages of social cognition

A

Stage 0 - socially egocentric.
Stage 1 - social information role-taking.
Stage 2 - self-reflective role-taking.
Stage 3 - mutual role-taking.
Stage 4 - social and conventional system role-taking.

46
Q

Explain Selman’s stage 0

A

Socially egocentric - 3-6 years.
Children can’t reliably distinguish between their own emotions and others. They identify emotions but not what caused them.

47
Q

Explain Selman’s stage 1

A

Social information role-taking - 6-8 years.
Children can tell the difference between their own and others’ views. However, they usually only focus in on one of these perspectives.

48
Q

Explain Selman’s stage 2

A

Self-reflective role-taking - 8-10 years.
Children can take on and completely appreciate another individual’s point of view. However, they can only take on board one view at a time.

49
Q

Explain Selman’s stage 3

A

Mutual role-taking - 10-12 years.

Children can look at the situation from their own and another persons point of view at the same time.

50
Q

Explain Selman’s stage 4

A

Social and conventional system role-taking - 12+ years.

Children learn that being able to see each other’s perspectives is not always enough to reach an agreement.

51
Q

Explain what is meant by social cognition

A

This describes the mental processes we make use of when engaged in social interaction.
Eg: We make decisions on how to behave based on our own understanding of a social situation. Both the understanding and decision-making are cognitive processes.

52
Q

Evaluate Selman’s levels of perspective taking

A

+ Marton et al (2009) looked at how perspective taking can be related to ADHD children. The research on 50 8 to 12-year-olds on tasks of perspective taking found they were significantly poorer than controls at identifying feelings, understanding scenarios and evaluating consequences - application - can test for ADHD.
- Wu and Keysar (2007) found that when conducting perspective gaking tasks in young adults, chinese invidiuals performed significantly better than matched America participants of the same age - generalisability. It’s a Western theory. This can’t explain why Chinese are smarter/faster - pop val.
- there is a lot more to social development and purely looking at cognitive ability. It doesn’t consider emotional self-regulation or empathy - validity. Overly cognitive. Internal factors: empathy and emotional regulation. External factors: family climate and opportunities to learn from peer interaction.
+ Selman did a follow up longitudinal study and involved 41 boys. None of the children regressed in their ability to understand perspective. All had made improvements and non-Haskett stages, which could be linked to Piaget’s stages of development - reliability - provides evidence for Selman’s stages and how they continue to develop with age.
- correlation does not equal causation. There may be several outliers which you could differ drastically from these correlations. It also doesn’t prove causation in them - internal validity.

53
Q

What is the theory of mind?

A

A child’s ability to understand that other minds think different Things and to make theories about what people are thinking. It focuses on thought processes.
Our personal understanding (theory) of what other people are thinking or feeling. Sometimes it’s referred to as mind reading.

54
Q

What is a false belief task?

A

A test of the theory of mind where you show a child is a misleading task and show them that it is a false belief. Can the child distinguish between the false belief and the true belief?

55
Q

At what age do children begin to develop a theory of mind?

A

4.

Any younger they’re shit.

56
Q

Explain Wimmer and Perner’s study

A

1983.
They created a story about a boy called Maxi. His mum comes home and put chocolate for a cake in a blue cupboard. Maxi then goes off to play. The mum makes a cake and put the rest of the chocolate in the green cupboard. Maxi comes back. Where will he look?
Nearly all three-year-olds say green. Blue is Maxi’s false belief. At the age of 4, some say blue. By 6, all say blue.

57
Q

Explain Meltzoff’s study - intentional reasoning in toddlers (1988)

A

Children 18 months old observed adults placing beads into a jar.
In the experimental condition, the adults fail and drop the beads.
In the control condition, the adults placed the beads in the jar successfully. In both conditions, the infant place beads in the jar; they didn’t drop any. This suggests that the infants were imitating what the adults intended to do. This shows that infants have a simple understanding of theory of mind.

58
Q

Explain Barom-Cohen’s 1985 Sally-Anne task.

Include results in your answer.

A

This was a false belief task. This used 20 high functioning children diagnosed with ASD and a control group of 14 children with down syndrome and 27 without any diagnosis were individually given the Sallianne test.
Sally puts her marble in her basket. When Sally isn’t looking, and takes the marble out of the basket and put it into her box. When Sally comes back, where will she look?
85% of controls accurately answered compared to only 20% of ASD.

59
Q

Explain Baron-Cohen’s 1997 eye study

A

A study was conducted using images of eyes to indicate emotions. Participants had to read the emotions correctly from images of eyes. ASD adults performed poorly on this task, which Baron-Cohen used to support the theory that ASD is characterised by deficit in theory of mind.

60
Q

Evaluate theory of mind

A
  • culture bias. Baron-Cohen’s sample was entirely British. Maguire (2013) suggested that higher rates of autism diagnosed in the West may be explained by the symptoms associated may not be considered abnormal in other cultures. Our view of social interaction is a problem. It’s a western not universal perspective - generalisability.
  • Theory of mind research shows only autistic kids lack of theory of mind. This can’t be generalised. Is it cause or effect? Does lack of social skills lead to lack of theory of mind or vice versa? - internal validity.
    + there is evidence for the role of experience and biology - Perner et al (1994) - having a large family and especially older siblings means a child is challenged to think about others when resolving conflicts.
    Sabbath and Callahan (1998) - discussion about motives and other mental states promotes theory of mind development - reliability.
  • it’s hard to distinguish between theory of mind and perspective taking. Many methods used to study theory mind could be measures of perspective taking. For example the Sallianne test - internal validity.
61
Q

What is the benefit of mirror neurons?

A

Social cognition

62
Q

What does a mirror neuron system consist of?

Define what these are.

A

Special brain cells called Mirror neurons distributed in several areas of the brain. Mirror neurons are unique because they fired both in response to personal action and in response to action on the part of others. These special neurons may be involved in social cognition, allowing us to interpret intention and emotion in others.

63
Q

How does the mirror neuron system work?

A

It fires whenever we see something with a specific action or emotion

64
Q

What is the mirror neurons do?

A

They allow us to learn from other people and allow us to imitate other people. We can recognise skills and actions from the world around us.

65
Q

How do you mirror neurons linked to social cognition?

A

They allow us to show empathy to others and help us to understand and respond to others’ actions and emotions.

66
Q

How do mirror neurons differ for ASD?

A

Their mirror neurons are different. The brainwaves aren’t replicated when observing an action compared to doing an action.

67
Q

Explain Rizzolatti et al’s study

A

They discovered mirror neurons by accident, while studying the motor cortex in monkeys. They noticed that when the experiment to reach for food inside of the monkeys, the area of the brain used when the monkeys performed the task, also lit up when watching the task.
They concluded that our brains will respond by mirroring activity in another individual.

68
Q

Explain how the mirror neuron system works in intention

A

Gallese and Goldman (1998) - mirror neurons respond to intentions behind behaviour as well as observed actions. Social cognition. We experience their intentions using our mirror neurons.

69
Q

Explain how the mirror neuron system works in perspective taking

A

Mirror neurons are important in other social cognitive functions, for example theory of mind And the ability to take others perspectives. If mirror neurons fire at others actions and intentions, this may give us a new mechanism for experiencing, and hence understanding, other peoples’ perspectives and emotions.

70
Q

Explain how the mirror neuron system works in human evolution

A

Ramachandran (2011) suggested that Mirror neurons are so important that they have affectively shaped human evolution. Without millions we couldn’t live in large groups with social roles and rules that characterised human culture. He says they’re absolutely key to understanding the way humans have developed as a social species.

71
Q

What is the broken mirror theory of ASD?

Who coined this and when?

A

The idea that neurological deficit including dysfunction in the mirror neuron system prevent a developing child imitating and understanding social behaviour in others.
Ramachandran and Oberman (2006).

72
Q

Evaluate mirror neurons

A

Yes

73
Q

Where is the Brodman’s area?

A

The right frontal lobe, which is rich in mirror neurons

74
Q

Evaluate mirror neurons

A

+ Haker et al (2012) did an fMRI study for empathy. They found an area of the brain believed to be rich in Mirror neurons is involved in contagious yawning, and example of human empathy. fMRI used to assess participant brain activity while shown videos of others yawning. When participants yawned, they showed considerable activity in Brodmann’s area - reliability.
+ Mouras et al (2008) found another region believed to be rich - the pars opercularis. Mouras provided evidence that it’s involved In perspective taking. Males were shown either a fishing documentary, Mr. Bean open. Brain activity assessed using FMRI and arousal buy a pressure sensitive penis ring. Pars opercularis activity was seen immediately before arousal, the mirror neurons produced the perspective taking that made pornographic arousal.
- Hajikhani (2007) found mixed evidence for ASD. Some studies show a smaller average thickness of pas opercularis. Structural brain scans have shown a small average thickness for the pas opercularis In participants on the autism spectrum. Also, studies using functional scans have shown low activity in brain areas associated with mirror neurons in participants with ASD. However, linking ASD to Mirror neurons has mixed evidence. Other functional scans have shown lower activity in brain areas associated with mirror neurons in participants with ASD. This is a problem with a broken mirror theory of ASD. The theory is credible because of close links of ASD signs and the likely role of Mirror neurons in social cognition - reliability.
- we are not able to study individual brain cells due to ethical issues of putting electrics in human brains. Scanning doesn’t allowers to measure activity in individual brain cells because it’s impossible to insert electrodes into the human brain to measure activity on a cellular level. This means that researchers are generally measuring activity in a part of the brain and inferring that this means activity in Mirror neurons. This is a lack of direct evidence.

75
Q

What are the 3 main impairments in someone with ASD?

A

Empathy,
Social imagination,
Social communication