3. attachment Flashcards
attachment
infants and caregivers develop deep and lasting emotional bonds. both members of this emotional relationship seek closeness and feel more secure when close to their attachment figure
reciprocity
a mutual turn-taking form of interaction. both caregiver and infant contribute to the interaction by responding to the other’s signals and cues
interactional synchrony
a simultaneous interaction between the infant and the caregiver, who appear to be acting rhythmically, with matching, coordinated behaviour and matching emotional states
imitation
the infant directly copies the caregiver’s expression
sensitive responsiveness
the adult caregiver correctly interprets the meaning of the infant’s communication and is motivated to respond appropriately
caregiver interactions in humans strengths (AO3)
― Meltzoff & Moore:
➥ An experimenter displayed facial gestures to 12- to 21-day-old infants
➥ Recordings of infant responses were rated by people blind to the experiment
➥ Found infant responses matched the experimenter’s facial expressions
➥ Suggets the ability to observe and reciprocate through imitation is present from a young age
― Condon & Sander:
➥ Videotaped interactions between adults and neonates
➥ Thorough detailed analysis of video-recordings and found interactional synchrony
➥ Suggests that even from birth, humans have an innate ability for social interaction
― Many studies use multiple observers, blind to the true aims of the experiment, to provide inter-reliability or even use complex camera systems to document and slow down micro-sequences of interactions between caregivers and infants. This high control of infant studies indicates high internal validity
caregiver-infant interactions in humans limitations (AO3)
― Infants cannot directly communicate their thoughts or emotions. Therefore, findings in Caregiver-infant interaction research depend on inferences which are considered unscientific. Inferences could be mistaken; for example, researchers should not claim imitation behaviour is intentional; it may be imitation is an unconscious automatic reflex response
― Social sensitivity is a concern when investigating child-rearing techniques, including norms and caregiver-infant interactions, as some women may find their life choices criticised, such as mothers who decide to return to the workplace shortly after giving birth and cannot develop a high level of interactional synchrony with their infant
Schaffer: stages of attachment & age
― asocial (0 to 6 weeks)
― indiscriminate attachment (6 weeks to 7 months)
― discriminate attachment (7 to 9 months)
― multiple attachment (from 9 months)
asocial (0 to 6 weeks)
babies display innate behaviours (crying/smiling) that ensure proximity to any potential caregiver. anyone can comfort them, as they do not prefer any individual caregiver
indiscriminate attachment (6 weeks to 7 months)
infants develop the ability to tell the difference between familiar and unfamiliar individuals, smiling more at the people they see frequently
specific attachment (7 to 9 months)
babies form a strong attachment to a primary caregiver, most often their mother. It is in this stage that separation anxiety and stranger anxiety develop
multiple attachment (from 9 months)
the infant starts to form attachments with other regular caregivers (like fathers, grandparents, siblings), and stranger anxiety starts to decrease
Schaffer & Emerson procedure
Schaffer and Emerson conducted a longitudinal observation
― 60 working class babies and their families from Glasgow were studied. In the first year, data was collected through monthly observations & interviews, with an additional follow-up visit at 18 months. Two types of behaviour were assessed: stranger anxiety (signs of discomfort when left with the researcher) and separation anxiety (discomfort when the primary caregiver moved to another room)
Schaffer: stages of attachment strengths (AO3)
― It was found that separation anxiety occured in most babies by 25 to 32 weeks. In the 18-month follow-up, 87% had developed multiple attachments. The strongest attachment was to those mothers with consistent caregiver-infant interaction.
― As infants and their families were observed in their own home, the study had a high level of mundane realism; the experience for the infants were normal. Strangers visiting the family home and the caregiver temporarily leaving the room are normal occurrences. This suggests the behaviour recorded was valid.
Schaffer: stages of attachment limitation (AO3)
― The sample in Schaffer’s study may not be generalisable or may have temporary validity as it only included a group of working-class mothers in 1960s Glasgow, and child-rearing practices have likely changed significantly in the past 60 years