3. Animal Studies Of Attachment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What did Lorenz research?

A

Imprinting on geese (ridifugous birds)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the independent variable in Lorenz’s study?

A

Whether the birds saw their mother or Lorenz as the first moving object

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the dependant variable in Lorenz’s research?

A

Who the goslings followed after they hatched

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What procedure did Lorenz use to discover imprinting?

A
  • Field experiment
  • divided a clutch of eggs into 2 groups (one saw mother first, one saw Lorenz first and were kept near him in incubator)
  • Measured imprinting by releasing them from upturned box and seeing who they went to first
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who did the incubator goslings imprint on?

A

Followed Lorenz everywhere (control group followed mother)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define Imprinting

A

Ridifugous birds follow the first large moving object they see

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the critical period Lorenz found for imprinting?

A

4-25 hours (irreversible, and after which they did not imprint at all)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is sexual imprinting?

A

A later case study in 1952 found that species show courtship to species of attachement figure (e.g. peacock showed sexual attraction to giant tortoise because of this)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe the generalisability of Lorenz’s study

A

Lorenz only studied geese which are less emotional and complex than humans so findings cannot necessarily be generalised to humans

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How did a study by Guiton et. Al in 1996 contradict Lorenz’s suggestion that imprinting was permanent?

A

Chickens imprinted on rubber gloves were able to earn to be sexually attracted to other chickens, so sexual imprinting or imprinting may not be permanent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What influence did Lorenz’s study have in psychology?

A
  • Suggestion that imprinting was innate

- Lead to theories there was a critical period for humans

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did Harlow study?

A

Contact comfort in rhesus monkeys

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How did Harlow test this?

A

Reared 8 baby monkeys with wire mother and cloth mother- wire mother or cloth mother dispensed milk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Who did the monkeys seek comfort with?

A

The soft cloth mother- regardless of who gave them milk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was more important for the monkeys? Food or comfort?

A

Comfort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What effect did maternal deprivation have on monkeys?

A

Permanent effect on future relationships- more aggressive, timid and neglectful as parents & unskilled at mating

17
Q

What is the critical period of attachment in monkeys?

A

90 days- effects irreversible outside this period

18
Q

What are the applications of Harlow’s research?

A
  • Used to explain some effects of maternal deprivation in humans (as closely related)
  • Emphasised importance of contact comfort over food
  • Helped social workers & psychologists gain deeper understanding of deprivation in children and its impact n later relationships
  • Zoos and breeding programs
19
Q

What are the ethical issues of Harlow’s research?

A

Protection from harm in monkeys- suffered in quality of life or died which word be human-like

20
Q

How may ethics be insignificant in this case?

A

Could be argued that the benefits of findings outweigh ethics