2nd Half Flashcards

1
Q

Critical Thinking

A

The methods that is used to reach a contemporary conclusion based on relevant evidence i.e., Reasons —> Conclusions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Deductive Reasoning

A

Mode of argument where:
A does or is B,
C is part of A,
C ALSO does or is B.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Inductive Reasoning

A

Mode of argument where:
A does or is B,
C is part of A,
C LIKELY does or is B.
More evidence will reinforce the argument.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Selective Application

A

Critical thinking is (mostly) restricted to inside the box interpretations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Rival Causes

A

Reasons that could also lead to the same conclusion one is trying to make with different reasons.
Reasons —> Conclusions OR
Rival Cause(s) —> Conclusions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Common Cause

A

C caused A and B.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Causal Oversimplification

A

A caused B but not recognizing that C, D, and/or E, etc. might also cause B.
Ex. Mary hit a bird while driving because she was driving quickly, but it may have also been due to the bird diving in front of the vehicle.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Post Hoc Fallacy (Post hoc, ergo propter hoc)

A

A then or before B, therefore A caused B.
Ex. MMR vaccine injected into my child, then a week after, he gained autism. In actually, the child is already on the spectrum.
(Also known as the False Cause)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Ambiguity

A

Terms or ideas (and reasons) are not fully defined or have many different meanings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Abstract Term

A

Terms that have no absolute real life counterpart. Could be categories where there exists many interpretations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Rhetoric Modes

A

Ways of communicating ideas.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Loaded Language

A

Text that makes its points by using non-logical connections by hiding under rhetoric modes. Takes advantage of connotations and very powerful for evoking emotions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Cultural Assumptions

A

Presumptions based on personal cultural values that may not be shared by everyone but used as universal valid points or reasons.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Fallacy

A

A generalization or conclusion that is made based on non-representative facts. In other words, logical-sounding illogical arguments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Denotation

A

The explicit literal real life meaning of the word.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Connotation

A

The implicit associated meaning or feeling of the word.

17
Q

Necessary Conditions

A

A is REQUIRED for B to be true.

18
Q

Sufficient Conditions

A

A is ENOUGH for B to be true (but not needed).

19
Q

Bias

A

Preferences or favour towards certain perspectives.

20
Q

Objective

A

Unbiased; no preferences and only factual.
Most likely true for everyone.

21
Q

Subjective

A

Biased; preferences and personal opinions.
May be true for some but not others.

22
Q

Universalism

A

The assumption that everyone will share the same preconceptions regardless of different backgrounds.

23
Q

Cultural Imperialism

A

Imposing one’s culture on others as a means of dominance. Stems from the belief that theirs is better.

24
Q

Othering

A

The tendency to treat different people, well, differently. (Think the -isms).

25
Orientalism
Euro-American inclination to exoticize different cultures or people. (Think HBomb DEHR).
26
Heuristics
The innate ability to come to quick (and semi-good) conclusions based on limited evidence i.e., intuition. Think of it as the "antipode" to critical thinking.
27
Risk Averse
The tendency to be risky in perceived low risk conditions and vice a versa.
28
Factual Claim
Claim that can be proven or disproven. In other words, if a claim is not scrutinized, it is not a factual claim. Ex. I am a trained helicopter pilot. (This claim is not verified, therefore it is not factual).
29
Subjective Sources of Evidence (Subjective Evidence)
Evidence from personal experiences, intuitions, and testimonials. Not exactly reliable for general situations as it is often limited in scope.
30
Appeal to Authority
Evidence that is promoted by someone/people who IS/ARE ACTUALLY credible in relevant expertise. Evidence can be generalized (mostly)
31
Observational Studies
Evidence where the number personal experiences are cranked up a lot and investigated by (mostly) reliable people. Evidence can be generalized (mostly)
32
Case Studies
Evidence derived from one specific iteration for some specific condition (that is not representative for a larger group). Evidence can NOT be generalized.
33
Scientific Method
Evidence found using the scientific method. Wow amazing, considers rival causes and is inductive.