2.7 Criminal Litigation - Trial Procedure (Magistrates & Crown Court) Flashcards
What is the trial procedure in Magistrates’ Court?
1) ‘Preparation for Effective Trial’ form
- CPS/D completes at first court hearing (NO guilty plea) > Summary trial
- Form > Issues to be identified (contentious issues, W reqs), potential legal arguments
- CPS/D > Request pre-trial hearing, keep court informed of issues that may affect trial date, actively assist court in fulfilling case mgmt duties
2) CPS’s opening speech
- Likely short
- Brief intro
- Outline of evidence to be called
- To experienced bench (lay magistrates, district judge)
3) CPS’s evidence
W examination 1) CPS examines W 2) D cross-examines W 3) CPS re-examines W UNLESS W evidence agreed => Read to court (NO need for W to attend)
CPS evidence (exhibits) > Court
4) Submission of no case to answer [R v Galbraith]
NO case to answer (end of CPS’ case)
- Ask court to dismiss case (CPS case not sufficient to allow reasonable tribunal to convict D)
- Successful => Acquit D (NO need to present evidence) + NOT retry D on same offence
- NOT successful => Continue trial
Case to answer (NO submission)
- D is competent (NOT compelling) W for defence
- D will give evidence (call other Ws) > Otherwise court may draw adverse inferences if it considers CPS raised issues calling for D’s explanation
5) Closing speeches
- By D
- By CPS (if D called evidence other than his own)
6) Decision
- 2-3 mags/District Judge will hear case > Retire at end > Consider verdict (NOT substitute for lesser offence, reasons, all or nothing > guilty/NOT guilty)
- Court legal advisor > Advises MC on laws
- MC decides facts + laws
What is the trial procedure in Crown Court?
1) First hearing (Plea and Trial Preparation Hearing)
- Allow CC to exercise case mgmt powers
- Require parties to comply w duties
2) ‘Plea and Trial Preparation Form’
- CPS/D to complete
- D is formally arraigned > Guilty plea/NO guilty plea
- Court makes directions > Ensure trial is effective on listed dates/Avoid adjournments
3) Judge + jury preside over trial
- If jury decides D is guilty => Judge to pass sentence (max. life imprisonment/limited by statutes)
4) Types of offences
- EW offences
- Indictable-only + related offences
- Convicted offenders at CC
- Committed for sentence at MC
- Appeals vs conviction/sentence at MC/YC
What is the burden of proof?
CPS has legal burden to prove D’s guilt [Woolmington principle]
D has reverse burden of proof
- Actual > Insanity pleaded/Law creates such burden
- Implied > D relies on defence of exception/exemption/proviso/excuse/qualification re offence
- Can challenge if violate Art 6 ECHR (contrary to right to presumption of innocence until guilty is proven) > May ‘read down’ Art 6 so only evidential burden
D has legal burden to prove D’s alibi/positive defence (if D advanced them)
Legal burden
- CPS > Beyond reasonable doubt
- D > Balance of probabilities
Evidential burden (party holding legal burden) - D to create reasonable doubts in jury's mind (if evidence believed + contradicted)
Formal admissions
- By CPS/D
- NO need for admitted facts to be proven at trial
- Before trial (writing)/At trial (writing/oral)
What is the difference between leading and non-leading questions?
CPS/D can elicit supporting evidence from W
Leading qs
- ‘Isn’t it true that…?’
- Suggest particular answer
- NOT ask re matter in issue
- Rep cannot lead W to give answers that Rep wants to hear
Non-leading qs
- Open/Closed qs
- Can start neutrally > Interrogatories (who/what/why/when/how)
- Can start w/ neutral invitation > Explain/describe
- If subject of q agreed => Examination-in-chief can lead
- Advocate can ask leading qs > Elicit denial from W re own alleged actions/conduct
What is competence and compellability?
W must be present at court
- Called to testify (except experts/police)
- Refresh memories > Review W statements
Competent to testify
- Presumed > UNLESS challenged > Pre-trial (rare)/PTPH/Trial > May require court hearing expert to have evidence on W’s competency
Compellability
- Made to give evidence
- Otherwise contempt of court/imprisonment
Competent + compellable (D/D’s spouse)
- To give evidence for D (UNLESS jointly charged)
- To give evidence for CPS > D charged w (threat of) assault vs spouse or child under 16 / sexual offence vs child under 16 (UNLESS spouse/civil partner jointly charged) / attempt to conspire/aid/abet/counsel/procure/incite such offences
What are special measures?
Affordable to;
- Vulnerable (D < 18 at hearing OR significant physical or mental impairment)
- Intimidated Ws (diminished in quality through fear/distress connected with testifying)
- Ws (sexual offence/violence cases)
Examples
- Give evidence (behind screen/TV live link/privately)
- Removal of wigs/gowns
- Video-recorded evidence/cross or re-examinations
- W exam through intermediary
- Aids to communication
- Anonymous W evidence
What is the solicitor’s duty to the court?
Advocacy in Crown Court
- Barristers
- Needs further qualifications > Higher rights of audience
- Otherwise limited to MC appeals, sentencing committals, prelim hearings before arraignment
Instruct counsel
- Draft brief (details, case paper)
- Prepare trial case (tracing, interview Ws, statements, necessary comms w CPS + court)
What is the procedure for trial on indictment?
1) Jury empanelment
CPS can uncover info re juror potentially unsuitable
CPS can challenge juror for cause
- D knows juror > Discharge juror
- Bias allegatio > Question juror
- CPS can show present danger of jury tampering
12 jurors selected from pool of jurors available at court
2) CPS opening speech
- Address jury
- Detailed explanation (facts, offence, intent to prove D’s guilt)
3) Call CPS evidence + submission of no case to answer
4) D’s opening speech
- Call Ws to testify (disputed facts, NOT character W)
- Summarise D’s case
5) D’s case
6) Closing speeches
- By D
- By CPS (rare)
7) Judge’s summary
- Rulings of law
- Facts > Jury
- Reiterate burdens +standards of proof
- Review evidence + laws
- Specific directions (Turnbull warnings, draw inferences) => Jury
8) Jury’s verdict
- Retire > Deliberate on verdict
- Request clarification from judges/Ask to see exhibits
Verdict
- Unanimous
- Maj. verdict (10:2) after +2 hours elapsed (in some courts)
- Otherwise hung jury => Retry D => Retry D again (exceptional cases)
Guilty verdict
- Sentence D
- Adjourn matter for pre-sentencing report
NOT guilty verdict
- Discharge D