2.5.2 Challenges of religious experience Flashcards
What are Freud’s main points?
- “religion is an illusion”
- “the religions of mankind must be classed among the mass-delusions of this kind”
Who is Sigmund Freud?
- 20th century psychoanalyst
- founding father of modern psychology
- human behaviour is explained by the subconscious mind
Describe Sigmund Freud’s ideas
- Sigmund Freud argued that “religion is an illusion”
- he saw visions as ‘at best signs of immaturity, at worst symptoms of mental illness.’
- he investigated the role of the subconscious mind & believed that religious belief in God was the result of the infantile need for a powerful ‘father figure’.
- religion is the projection of our greatest hopes, fears & desires (e.g. for protection, security)
What are Russell’s main points?
- “[religious experiences] are hallucinations”
- “There is no difference between someone who eats too little and sees Heaven and someone who drinks too much and sees snakes”
Who is Bertrand Russell?
20th century mathematician, logician & philosopher
Describe Bertrand Russell’s ideas
- religious experience have physiological/psychological explanations
- for example, they are hallucinations as a result of eating too little
- they do not prove the existence of God because they have a scientific explanation - they are delusions
What are Charles Stross’s main points?
- “[religious experiences] are misinterpretations”
- “one ape’s hallucination is another ape’s religious experience”
Who is Charles Stross?
British sci-fi & fantasy writer
Describe Charles Stross’s ideas
- apparent ‘religious experiences’ are misinterpretations
- humans wrongly interpret physiologically originating experiences as divine; this is often as a result of social influences
- for example, someone from a Christian background may have a vision of Jesus; the cultural relativism of such experiences demonstrates their human origins
What are Schweitzer’s main points?
- “Paul had an epileptic fit”
- “The most natural hypothesis is therefore that Paul suffered from some kind of epileptiform attacks … It would agree with this, that on the road to Damascus he hears voices during an attack, & suffers afterwards from a temporary affection of the eyesight, if his experience at his conversion really happened during such an attack”.
Who is Albert Schweitzer?
20th century theologian, philosopher & physician
Describe Albert Schweitzer’s ideas
- St. Paul is the best example of a ‘religious experience’ caused internally
- he finds the ‘most natural hypothesis’ is that Paul suffered from epileptiform attacks
- indeed, people with Temporal Lobe Epilepsy (TLE) are sometimes prone to religious visions & mystical experiences
What is Richard Swinburne’s argument of religious experiences?
Swinburne argues that, since people usually tell the truth, there are only three types of evidence that should be taken as rendering their testimonies unreliable, namely:
- if the circumstances surrounding the experience are unreliable, for example through hallucinatory drugs
- if there is particular evidence to suggest that the person is lying
- if the experience can be explained in terms other than God, for example if the person is suffering from a mental illness
What does Swinburne interpret of religious experiences?
- since so many thousands of people have had an experience of what seems to them to be of God, then it is a basic principle of rationality that we should believe them
- he called this the principle of credulity - that unless we have overwhelming evidence to the contrary, then we should believe that things are as they seem to be
What does Swinburne say about religious experience in his book The Existence of God (1979)?
- he wrote that: “How things seem to be is a good guide to how things are…”
- therefore, in his view, religious experiences provide a convincing proof for the existence of God: “I suggest that the overwhelming testimony of so many millions of people to occasional experiences of God must, in the absence of counter-evidence, be taken as tipping the balance of evidence decisively in favour of the existence of God’.