2.2 Companies: Company Constitution Flashcards
What is the legality test
Tailored AoA must be consisten w/ CA provisions
Pro of capping delegation under MA 5
Cap may be significant for small business, to control spending
154 CA on what
Ds for Priv + PubC
Alternative to capping Ds power under MA 3, when D = M
Provision in SA to keep cap private
CA section on docs for registration at CH
9
271 says what
PubC needs to have CS
Con of capping delegation
Removing if company grows requires amending AoA
MA 17(1) on what
Methods of appointing Ds
CA provision on amending AoA
21(1)
Can method to change name be amended by AoA (+ section)
Yes per 77(1)(b)
Section for Ms to approve an act in advance that would otherwise be BoD by D
180(4)
Can BM power to delegate under MA 5 be restricted?
Yes
Alternative to capping delegation under MA 5
Easier to use BR to impose cap, so only BR to remove, rather than BR + SR (21(1))
Advantage for shelf company for time
If fits purpose, only need to amend e.g. officers and reg office
When does cap on D’s powers under MA 3, requiring shareholder res, make no difference
When M = D
CA provision that 3rds relying on board in GF have appauth
40
Can BM power be restricted under MA 3
Yes - silent in CA
Disadvantage of inc. from scratch for cost
Filing costs can be p to £100 + legal costs in creating AoA (if not using MA)
Advantage of incorporation from scratch for time
E-filing is same day if before 4.30
Pros of capping Ds power under MA 3, requiring Shareholder Res to go above cap (if 1M)
If there is 1M, gives them a second check, and easy to pass res
Cons of capping Ds power under MA 3
Time-consuming if company grows. If all Ms = Ds, makes no difference.
Pro of casting vote under MA 13
Avoids deadlock
Advantage of inc. from scratch for formalities
Can use MA + just file s.9 docs
Provision on appointing Ds
MA 17(1)
Disadvantage of inc from scratch for tim
Other than e-filing takes longer, and bespoke AoAs are time-consuming