21 - Social Competence and Dominance Flashcards
Social competence
An individual’s adequacy, effectiveness, proficiency, success in interacting with peers/friends
How to measure social competence
Traditionally measured via peer acceptance. But not all prosocial children are popular. Some aggressive, bullying, manipulative behaviors associated with higher popularity
Sociometric vs perceived popularity
Sociometric - how much kid is liked, related to levels of prosocial behavior. Interpersonal perceptual accuracy
Perceived popularity - perceived influence in peer group. Prosocial and antisocial behavior - bistrategic. Interpersonally effective.
Two measures closely related at start but diverge, esp for girls
Interpersonal perceptual accuracy
Prosocial. Perceptive to others’ goals, intentions. Emotional understanding and recognition. Empathy. Do not assert themselves on others
Play and sociometric popularity
Complexity of play behavior (social pretend and cooperative) predicts peer acceptance later in childhood
Peer group entry
Kids who are lower on peer acceptance seem disruptive when trying to enter a group. Seem self-centered as opposed to interested in goals of group
Conflict resolution skills
Peer acceptance is inversely related to the frequency of conflicts. Behavioral and verbal strategies
2 Types Peer rejection
Aggressive-rejected - overestimate acceptance and are more aggressive. Withdrawn-rejected - underestimate acceptance and become withdrawn.
Interpersonal effectiveness
Not always interpersonally sensitive. Leaders. Goal-oriented - domineering, aggressive, manipulative, coercive. Perceived popularity
Value of social status over development
Rule adherence becomes increasingly important, as does romance.
Limitations to studying social competence
Social competence does not just mean competence in interacting with peers. The ability to develop close friendships may be as valuable. Popularity helpful in childhood, but unknown whether facilitates social development beyond.
Bullies
Interpersonally perceptually accurate children unlikely to be bullies. Interpersonally effective children likely to be bullies.
Dominance hierarchies
Ordering of social relationships according to influence. Observed as young as 18mo. Dominant children are more socially competent. Dominant individuals tend to be able to use multifaceted strategies. Post-conflict resolution strategies.
Function of dominance hierarchy
Reduces overall aggression in group. Dominants may still use strategic aggression or threats however,
Consequence of dominance hierarchy
Dominant children direct behavior of other children, coercive, control resources such as space, objects, relationships. Social dominance linked to ToM