2.1 Capital Structure Flashcards

1
Q

Define discount rate(s)

A

Opportunity cost of capital required by investors given the best available expected return offered on investments of comparable risk and timing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is Discounted Flow Valuation?

A

Universal method the applies to the valuation of any asset or security.

Discount rate not the same across all classes of claims as it always reflects the riskiness of the cash flows at hand.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Discounted Cash Flow Valuation equation

A

General case of uncertainty combined with a non-flat term structure.

When PV becomes a nice sigma sum function: consistency in the discount rate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

If there is no fixed schedule of mandatory payments (like debt), a firm may choose never to pay dividends. Is equity therefore costless?

A

No. Shareholders require their opportunity cost of capital, i.e. return of next-best alternative of the same risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are sources of value?

A

Dividends, as well as price increases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How can managers estimate cost of equity?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Equilibrium in capital structure

A

Absent arbitrage opportunities.

Stock price revels the correct opportunity cost of the firm’s equity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Difference between equity and debt

A

Equity:

Residual claim (cash flows subject to availability)

Cost of equity = return on comparable investment

Debt:

Fixed claim (repayments known in advance)

Debt is senior to equity

No default risk: cost of debt = return on riskless securities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Merton’s (1974) model

Assumptions and implications

A

Assumes that: all firm debt is a zero bond with face value d and maturing in T.

Graph shows payoffs to debt- and equity holders in T as a function of firm value V.

The upside potential to the debt is capped at d while unlimited for the stock.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Observations about debt and equity financing

A

Risk-free or not, debt remains generally less risky than equity since creditors are paid first.

Equity financing more expensive than debt financing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

When does distinguishing between debt and equity financing actually matter?

A

Distinction between debt and equity only relevant if future cash flows from business operations are uncertain.

Otherwise, with certain expectations (Fisher Model), both types of claimants could forecast cash flows accurately and would require the risk-free rate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Aim of capital structures

A

Can the financial manager maximise firm value by finding the optimal financing mix? (The capital structure that minimises the average cost of capital)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How will the capital structure determine firm value?

A

Mix of equity and debt will affect the discount rate which discount future cashflows.

Thus it will affect firm value.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)?

A

A metric which reflects the relative proportions of equity and debt in this capital structure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Equation for WACC

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How can we calculate the firm’s market value?

+ equation

A

Firm’s market value = sum of its outstanding debt and common stock market values, as well as to the present value of the relevant future cash flows discounted by the WACC.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Example:

Table for rate of reurns for both scenaries and whole venture for equity and debt combinations 100:0, 75:25, 50:50. 25:75: 10:90.

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Example:

What observations can be made?

A

Spread between returns in both states of the world widens with debt share. Standard deviation of return increases and equity becomes riskier.

Expected return (or cost of capital) of the equity increases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

How can we write rE when rD is riskless?

A
20
Q

Impact of a higher leverage on WACC

A
21
Q

Traditional view: diagram for debt/equity ratio

A
22
Q

Implications of the traditional view

A

Moderate borrowing → rather flat increase in rE, whereas the rate shoots up when borrowing excessively.

Curve for the weighted average capital cost rA is convex - minimum at (D=E) = optimal capital structure.

23
Q

Traditional view: three effects of growing debt

Implication of these effects

A
  1. “Expensive” equity substituted by “cheap” debt.
  2. Equity becomes more “risky”, return required by shareholders increases (initially slow but then accelerates).
  3. Debt cost increases - high leverage - when creditors begin to think their position is not secure anymore.

Opposing effects: there is an optimal capital structure where both effects exactly cancel out. Below optimum (1) is more important than (2).

24
Q

Modigliani-Miller proposition I

A
25
Q

What does the “pie theory” state?

A

“The size (value) of the pie (firm) is independent of hot it is divided. It does not matte how it is divided up between different claimants (debt- and shareholders).”

26
Q

How does cost of equity rE (λ) need to adjust for equilibrium (VU = VL) to hold?

A

Then: Modigliani-Miller proposition II

27
Q

Modigliani-Miller propostition II

A
28
Q

Modigliani-Miller returns graphically

A
29
Q

Modigliani-Miller conclusions

A

Perfect capital market in equilibrium: capital structure decisions irrelevant as they cannot create any value.

Two firms entirely identical except for their leverage must have same value.

30
Q

Why must entirely identical firms except for their leverage have the same value?

[M-M conclusion]

A

Investors can use perfect and complete capital market to transform an existing cashflow stream into one that fits their risk preferences without any loss (same argument as Shareholder Unanimity conclusion in the Fisher model).

Cost of equity increases in the leverage ratio. However, higher returns entail higher risks.

31
Q

Modigliani-Miller conclusions for valuation

A

eEmployed discount rate should be rA= rE(0) if the cashflows “to the firm”. rE(λ) is the cashflows “to the equity” only.

32
Q

What is the modern view with frictions?

A

Relax Modigliani-Miller assumptions and introduce two sources of frictions: taxes and brankruptcy.

33
Q

What if we introduce taxes?

Recognition and intuition

A

Recognition: debt interest can be deducted from taxable income.

Intuition: Government effectively pays fraction of the interest. Investors cannot get such a tax break on homemade leverage. Hence, they will pay a premium for levered firms.

34
Q

What happens to WACC after-tax? Implication?

A

WACC decreases as leverage increases.

Firm value is maximised when the firm is entirely debt-financed and no shares are issued.

35
Q

What if we introduce financial distress and bankruptcy?

A
36
Q

What constitutes direct costs?

[financial distress]

A

Administrative and court cost, legal and advisory fees.

^ Resources spent by management and creditors dealing with bankruptcy.

Mismanagement by judges (blocking/delaying non-routine expenditures.

US average time in bankruptcy: 20 months

37
Q

What conclusions can be taken from introducing financial distress into the modern view?

A

Tax benefit counterbalanced to some extent by “dark side of debt”, costs of financial distress, and there is effectively an optimal level of leverage.

Interplay of the two factors is called the “trade-off theory” of debt.

38
Q

Diagram with frictions: trade-off theory

A
39
Q

What does Modigliani-Miller’s ideas imply about dividend policy?

A

Irrelevance of the dividend policy.

40
Q

Why is the dividend policy independent of consumption preferences of the shareholders?

Recall: Fisher Model.

If firm invests in all positive-NPV and reduces $c_0$ consumption (cuts dividends) and the resulting time of payments (dividend amounts) is not in line with shareholders’ consumption preferences, they can sell part or all of their stock in capital market, thereby achieving favoured consumption plan.

A

Recall: Fisher Model.

  • If firm invests in all positive-NPV and reduces c0 consumption (cuts dividends) and the resulting time of payments (dividend amounts) is not in line with shareholders’ consumption preferences, they can sell part or all of their stock in capital market, thereby achieving favoured consumption plan.
41
Q

Why is the dividend policy independent of the firm’s investment decisions?

A

In perfect capital market: effect of an investment project on market value is independent of the source of financing.

Dividend payout costs as much as its replacement if the firm was to raise cash. Since capital market allows firms to substitute the dividends paid out through borrowing, positive-NPV investment projects can still be pursued.

Hence, dividend policy is independent.

42
Q

How can dividend irrelevance proposition be reconciled with the DDM?

A

Recall: DDM with growth, present value can be increased by retaining more cash (i.e. paying less dividends) when firm has access to growth opportunities.

MM: Given firm’s investment program, no value can be added by tinkering with the payouts. Same for the shareholders.

43
Q

Does dividend irrelevance contradict MM?

A

In the DDM, effects from investment policy and dividend policy are confounded. When we increase b (because of good reinvestment opportunities with ROE>r), the dividend ratio is reduced AND an investment decision is made, both at the same time. The implied positive-NPV investment explains the value increase, NOT the financing decision of cutting back dividends.

Hence, it’s not in contradiction to MM.

44
Q

Payout policy can matter in the real world. What are important market imperfections to consider?

A

Taxes, transaction costs, information asymmetry

45
Q

Tax as a market imperfection: effect on dividend policy

A

If tax rate on dividends is higher than the one on capital gains, investors are drawn to low-payout stocks.

46
Q

Transaction costs as a market imperfection: effect on dividend policy

A

Dividend policy varies over firm’s life cycle (cheaper to retain cash if it is needed than to raise new capital). Younger companies tend to retain more cash for growth, whereas mature firms pay out.

47
Q

Information asymmetry as a market imperfection: effect on dividend policy

A

When managers have better information than investors on firm’s future prospects, payout decisions may signal this information.