2019 paper mistakes Flashcards
What type of distribution refers to a situation in which the majority of participants score highly on the measure on which they are assessed?
Negatively skewed
How would a ‘Type 2’ error be described?
Incorrectly accepting the null hypothesis
When would it be best to use the median rather than the mean?
When there are few scores much lower than the rest
A study investigating the difference in aggression between boys and girls recorded the number of times a child shouted at someone during playtime.
Which inferential tests be used to analyse the data?
Chi-Squared
Mann Whitney U
(both using an independent measures design)
Self - ratings of aggression (1 to 10) at different times of day (10 am to 10 pm)
In the study by Baron - Cohen et al what sampling technique was used to obtain the high-functioning adults with autism?
Self - selected
What is true of a field experiment?
A - has an independent variable
B - has an independent variable that can be manipulated.
C - has an independent variable that is always naturally occurring.
D - Has no independent variable
A- Has an independent variable
What is a coding frame?
A technique that enables qualitative data to be recorded as quantitative data
How to calculate degrees of freedom?
(Number of rows - 1) x (Number of columns - 1) = Degrees of Freedom
Statistical tests - when to reject null hypothesis for significance
Calculated more than critical = Chi-Squared & Spearman’s Rho
Calculated less than critical = Mann Whitney U, Wilcoxan & Sign test
Likert Scale
Degrees of agreement with the statement - e.g. very often - not at all
Semantic Scale
Opposite words - 7-point scale - e.g. boring - interesting
Strengths of nominal data
- Easy to collect
- Easy to analyse/interpret
- Easy to present in graphical form
Weakness of nominal data
- Doesn’t provide a reason for the behaviour observed
- Easy to miss some behaviours
- Can be misinterpreted
- Can’t calculate mean/ median scores as participants do not have individual scores.
What is a ‘Type 1’ error?
Incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis