2 - Priorities and Drivers for Rail in Multi-Modal Transport Flashcards
Change in 1830
Canals were main form of transport
First intercity railway opened in 1830 between Liverpool and Manchester
Outcomes of the Rail Technical Strategy
Mode of choice for passenger and freight
Railway that attracts investment and talent
Accessible and affordable mode that supports UK economy
Sustainable operations with positive environmental impact
Four C’s challenges
Carbon - climate change, energy supply
Capacity - how to get more people/things through the network
Cost - how to keep cost under control, reduce support from government
Customers - give people better experience of the railway
Points about carbon challenges
Origin of goal is in global warming, but also energy costs and possible tax on CO2 emissions
Rail emissions are only 0.5% total UK CO2 emissions
Moving to electric rather than diesel trains may help, but then need to consider source and availability of electricity
Aim of carbon challenge
Halve CO2 output by 2038
Value to industry of £0.5 billion/year
Aim of capacity challenge
Double capacity by 2038
Value to £7.5 billion/year (2009 prices)
How to reduce train crowding when train length and frequency are limited?
Better design of train interiors
Technology to reduce headway between trains
How to increase freight traffic without reducing passenger capacity?
Slow-moving freight takes up too much network capacity
Could be sped up?
Passenger and freight services could be better integrated through new vehicle designs?
Examples of targeted aims to achieve 4 C’s
Running trains closer together
Efficient passenger flows through trains and stations
Optimum energy use
Reasons why transport demand is changing
New business models: transport related (e.g. Uber); work accommodation changes (working from home)
Digital networks (5G): enables working from home
Ageing population: both travellers and workforce
Points about inspecting overhead lines
Overhead lines are contacted by train pantograph to pick up electric power
Overhead wires can suffer wear, failed joins, corrosion and fatigue
Modelling overhead lines
Sheffield working with Furrer+Frey and Network Rail to model life of overhead line
Aim - predict forces produced by pantograph loading combined with wire tension
Produced FEA model of contact wire dynamics and damage models of how wire stress drives failure modes
Benefits: predictable renewal rather than responding to wire failures; better specification of new equipment
Rolling contact fatigue problem points
High contact stresses at wheel-rail interface cause metal fatigue and so cracks and rail breaks
Measurement of surface crack length used to assess damage (ultrasound and eddy current inspection)
If early damage stages found, rail can be ground down, removing cracks and extending rail life
Otherwise severe grinding or rail replacement needed
Lab-based rolling contact testing points
Rail and wheel discs run together (using real materials)
Loaded to simulate train weight (smaller loads must be applied to achieve same contact pressure on smaller specimens as on full-size components)
Why are rail and wheel discs separately driven?
With only one disc driven, the discs would just be rolling together
Braking/traction creates combination of rolling and sliding