2) Objectives of Firms 2 Flashcards

1
Q

principal-agent problem definition

A

arises from conflict between the objectives of the principals and their agents, who take decisions on their behalf

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

principals definition

A

business owners

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

agents definition

A

managers running a business on a shareholders’ behalf

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

utility maximisation definition

A

managers maximising their utility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

social welfare definition

A

a firm existing to benefit wider society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

corporate social responsibility (CSR) definition

A

a firm acting to benefit wider society, the community or their emplovees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

CSR examples

A

ESG, Guardian, charity, HCHS, network rail

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

profit satisficing definition

A

managers doing just enough to satisfy shareholders by producing satisfactory profits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is the principle agent problem?

A
  • The principals of a firm are the owners; usually Share holders

• Shareholders exert control over managers with:
- Meetings (AGM)
• Performance related pay to provide incentives

• The agents control the business and are usually comprised of a board of directors and senior managers

• Managers and directors run the business on behalf of the owners, making the day to -day decisions.

• The principle-agent problem arises because information failure. between managers and owners, means that managers may not be viewed by shareholders as maximising profits

• If the objectives of managers are different to shareholders, manages may not even be trying to achieve the same objecrives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

utility maximisation: managers may enjoy:

A
  • The status of running a large team
    • Having a large office
    • Having a prestigious company car

not bearing the success of the business

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is an example of profit satisficing

A

o Lazy managers may want to have an easier time at work, and accept lower profits that are still acceptable to shareholders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Social welfare explain

A

• The firm, in part or in whole, exists to benefit wider society
• To increase social welfare the firm may donate a large % of profits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

explain what a Corporate social responsibility (CSR) does

A

CSR may involve the business doing, or sponsoring, chority work or encouraging employees to volunteer

(little compared to social welfare)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

analysis

how can owners minimise the principle agent problem?

A

Owners can minimise the principal-agent problem by aligning the incentives of managers with owners with performance related pay. This way the managers are incentivised to maximise the profits of the firm because the size of their remuneration is directly linked to the financial performance of the firm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

analysis

how will firms choose objectives?

A

A firm will choose an objective, or group of objectives, that reflect the objectives of the owners. Firms that are owned by shareholders will usually want to maximise profits, whereas firms owned by the government will usually want to increase social welfare.
Some firms, such as those owned by charitable trusts, may have more leeway to aim for a range of different objectives.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

judgement: what will the objectives of the firm depend on?

A

The objective or objectives that a firm chooses will depend on the owners, and the extent to which the principal-agent problem exists. The larger the principal-agent problem, the greater the degree to which the objectives of the owners and managers may diverge.

17
Q

Judgement

non-maximising objective of social welfare

A

extent to which the non-maximising objective of social welfare benefits the firm over profit maximisation depends upon the preferences of the target market. Assuming the target market is large enough, the more strongly the target market feel about the causes supported by the social welfare objective, the greater the potential benefit of increased sales.

18
Q

evakuation : 4 points, advantages

A
  • utility maximisation
  • social welfare
  • CSR
  • Profit satisficing
19
Q

Advantages: utility maximisation

A

the ‘trappings of power’ may be necessary to recruit the most productive and effective employees

20
Q

advantages: social welfare

A
  • in private firms, social welfare may be popular with customers increasing sales
  • most public sector firms have social welfare as their objective
21
Q

advantages: CSR

A

CSR may lead to happier and so more productive employees
- cheaper to achieve than social welfare

22
Q

advantages: profit satisficing

A

May prevent unscrupulous, though legal, behaviour that can lead to new legislation being imposed

23
Q

disadvantages: utility maximisation

A

The ‘Trappings of power” may be expensive and unnecessary

24
Q

4 disadvantages

A
  • utility maximisation
  • social responsibility
  • CSR
  • Profit satisficing
25
Q

disadvantages: social responsibility

A

High Opportunity cost of not earning more profit

26
Q

disadvantage: CSR

A

The opportunity cost of CSR is diverted attention and effort away from more expensive

27
Q

disadvantage: profit satisficing

A

leads to lower profits than are possible