2) Objectives of Firms 2 Flashcards
principal-agent problem definition
arises from conflict between the objectives of the principals and their agents, who take decisions on their behalf
principals definition
business owners
agents definition
managers running a business on a shareholders’ behalf
utility maximisation definition
managers maximising their utility
social welfare definition
a firm existing to benefit wider society
corporate social responsibility (CSR) definition
a firm acting to benefit wider society, the community or their emplovees
CSR examples
ESG, Guardian, charity, HCHS, network rail
profit satisficing definition
managers doing just enough to satisfy shareholders by producing satisfactory profits
what is the principle agent problem?
- The principals of a firm are the owners; usually Share holders
• Shareholders exert control over managers with:
- Meetings (AGM)
• Performance related pay to provide incentives
• The agents control the business and are usually comprised of a board of directors and senior managers
• Managers and directors run the business on behalf of the owners, making the day to -day decisions.
• The principle-agent problem arises because information failure. between managers and owners, means that managers may not be viewed by shareholders as maximising profits
• If the objectives of managers are different to shareholders, manages may not even be trying to achieve the same objecrives
utility maximisation: managers may enjoy:
- The status of running a large team
• Having a large office
• Having a prestigious company car
not bearing the success of the business
what is an example of profit satisficing
o Lazy managers may want to have an easier time at work, and accept lower profits that are still acceptable to shareholders
Social welfare explain
• The firm, in part or in whole, exists to benefit wider society
• To increase social welfare the firm may donate a large % of profits
explain what a Corporate social responsibility (CSR) does
CSR may involve the business doing, or sponsoring, chority work or encouraging employees to volunteer
(little compared to social welfare)
analysis
how can owners minimise the principle agent problem?
Owners can minimise the principal-agent problem by aligning the incentives of managers with owners with performance related pay. This way the managers are incentivised to maximise the profits of the firm because the size of their remuneration is directly linked to the financial performance of the firm.
analysis
how will firms choose objectives?
A firm will choose an objective, or group of objectives, that reflect the objectives of the owners. Firms that are owned by shareholders will usually want to maximise profits, whereas firms owned by the government will usually want to increase social welfare.
Some firms, such as those owned by charitable trusts, may have more leeway to aim for a range of different objectives.
judgement: what will the objectives of the firm depend on?
The objective or objectives that a firm chooses will depend on the owners, and the extent to which the principal-agent problem exists. The larger the principal-agent problem, the greater the degree to which the objectives of the owners and managers may diverge.
Judgement
non-maximising objective of social welfare
extent to which the non-maximising objective of social welfare benefits the firm over profit maximisation depends upon the preferences of the target market. Assuming the target market is large enough, the more strongly the target market feel about the causes supported by the social welfare objective, the greater the potential benefit of increased sales.
evakuation : 4 points, advantages
- utility maximisation
- social welfare
- CSR
- Profit satisficing
Advantages: utility maximisation
the ‘trappings of power’ may be necessary to recruit the most productive and effective employees
advantages: social welfare
- in private firms, social welfare may be popular with customers increasing sales
- most public sector firms have social welfare as their objective
advantages: CSR
CSR may lead to happier and so more productive employees
- cheaper to achieve than social welfare
advantages: profit satisficing
May prevent unscrupulous, though legal, behaviour that can lead to new legislation being imposed
disadvantages: utility maximisation
The ‘Trappings of power” may be expensive and unnecessary
4 disadvantages
- utility maximisation
- social responsibility
- CSR
- Profit satisficing
disadvantages: social responsibility
High Opportunity cost of not earning more profit
disadvantage: CSR
The opportunity cost of CSR is diverted attention and effort away from more expensive
disadvantage: profit satisficing
leads to lower profits than are possible