(2) measuring development Flashcards
What is the Human Development Index (HDI)?
- it is a summary measure of average achievement in key dimensions of human development: a long and healthy life, being knowledgeable and have a decent standard of living
- health dimension is assessed by life expectancy at birth
- education dimension is measured by mean years of schooling for adults aged 25 years and more and expected years of schooling for children of school entering age
- standard of living dimension is measured by gross national income per capita
What is the usefulness of HDI?
hint: 9
- was created to emphasize that people and their capabilities should be the ultimate criteria for assessing the development of a country, not economic growth alone
- Back in 1990 when HDI was first presented, the emphasis was mainly on economic growth
- today, the entire community accepts that development is more than increasing per capita GDP. HDI has been canonized in all standard textbooks on development economies or development studies, and is considered the most serious alternative to GDP per capita - is a more holistic indicator as it has multiple criteria as compared to GDP, which is a single criterion
- comprises not just economic aspects of growth, but include social and human development
- all 3 components are seen as the essential building blocks of life –> if not available, many other opportunities remain inaccessible - by ranking each of the 3 aspects of human development, it will allow authorities to identify areas of weakness that a society might wish to devote additional resources to improving, e.g. health and education spending
- gives direct value to factors, which help create opportunities for individuals to reach a higher and more fulfilling standard of living that may not be captured by the income/economic measure alone
- enable comparisons of the performance of a country or between countries over time
- can be used to question national policy choices, asking how two different countries with the same level of GNI per capita can end up with different HDI values
- these contrasts can stimulate debate about government policy priorities - measures relative deprivation from optimum level of development –> a gauge as to how far a country is from reaching the max HDI value
- e.g. HDI of 0.66 can mean that an economy has, on average, attained 66% of what is possible and has room for improvement - is still relevant today despite the many changes in the world
- continues to be among the most well-known and accepted measures of development, and are seen as critical components to per capita income and dollar-a-day poverty measures
What are the limitations of HDI?
hint: 7
- is a composite measure which provides a single number
- hence, cannot provide a comprehensive picture of the state of human development in any situation
- just focuses on the basic dimensions of human development and does not take into account a number of other important dimensions of human development - is composed of long-term human development outcomes, thus it cannot measure short-term human development achievements
- is an average measure and thus masks a series of disparities and inequalities within countries
- does not reflect income, ethnic, gender inequalities and regional differences
- is possible for a country with high HDI to have significant proportions of people concentrated at the bottom of the economic ladder, hence such inequalities are not reflected in the final HDI figure - income enters into the HDI not in its own right, but as a proxy for resources needed to have a decent standard of living
- does not consider political freedom and respect for human rights as an indicator of development
- not all countries have sufficient data available to calculate HDI
- Human Development Reports have become relatively unimportant, easily dwarfed by the ever-increasing free online availability of data, most notably World Bank’s online World Development Indicators, and the many non-state actors compiling data
- no one needs the Human Development Report to learn about new development data
What is the Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI)?
- it is a measure of poverty designed to capture the multiple deprivations that each poor person faces at the same time with respect to education, health, and other aspects of living standards
- provides a comprehensive and in-depth picture of global poverty
- hence is regarded a s a high resolution lens on poverty, can be used as an analytical tool to identify the most prevailing deprivations
-is the product of the incidence of multidimensional poverty and intensity of multidimensional poverty
MPI= H x A
What is the usefulness of MPI?
hint: 3
- can be broken down into its constituent parts, revealing the overlapping needs of families and communities across a range of indicators which so often have been presented in isolation
- helps policymakers to see where challenges lie and what needs to be addressed - can be adapted using indicators and weights that make sense at the country level to create tailored national poverty measures
- can be seen as a useful guide in helping governments tailor poverty measures that reflects multiple local indicators and data - used to create a comprehensive picture of people living in poverty, and permits comparisons both across countries, regions and the world, and within countries by ethnic group, urban/rural location, as well as other key household and community characteristics
What is the limitations of MPI?
hint: 6
- indicators may not reflect capabilities because flow data are not available for all dimensions
- health data are relatively weak and overlook some groups’ deprivations especially for nutrition
- careful judgments are needed to address missing data
- to be considered multidimensionally poor, households must be deprived in at least 6 standard of living indicators –> makes MPI less sensitive to minor inaccuracies - intra-household inequalities may be severe, but these could not be reflected
- while it includes intensity of poverty experienced, it does not measure inequality among the poor
- estimates presented are based on publicly available data and cover various years, which limits direct cross-country comparability
what is the North-South Divide? (based on Brandt Report 1980)
- based on GNP per capita
- DCs with high GNP per capita in the North
- LDCs with low GNP per capita in the South
what are the critiques of the North-South Divide?
-whilst there is a rough geographical correspondence in regions such as Europe, Africa, North and South America, the pattern is really more complex because of continuous economic development
- economic wealth of the South is extremely diverse
- comprises countries that range from a booming, half-industrilaised nation like Brazil, to poor landlocked countries or island countries such as Chad or Maldives
- many countries in the South are emerging and newly industrialising economic (India, China, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam, etc.)
- a few Southern oil-exporting countries have higher per capita income than some of the Northern countries
- in addition, some LDCs have made rapid progress to achieve developed world states (e.g. Singapore)
what are rich industrialised economies?
inter-region development gap
- e.g. Germany, USA, Japan, known as core economies
- were the first countries to industrialise in the 19th and early 20th century
- have now shifted from manufacturing to service activities (sectoral shift), while manufacturing activities have increasingly been relocated to NIEs and LDCs
- GDP per capita remains high
- suffer from de-industrialisation - the long term absolute decline in jobs and production (output) in the manufacturing sector
- de-industrialisation impacted traditional ‘sunset’ industries of steel-making, coal, shipbuilding, textiles and heavy engineering –> are heavy industries which involve low-value, labour intensive and dirty work
what are oil-exporting economies?
inter-region development gap
- e.g. Saudi Arabia, Kuwait
- during the late 20th century, the world economy became increasingly dependent on oil
- while price of most primary products were falling, the price of oil increased
- were in a strong position to negotiate with the rest of the world the price of oil –> high GNP per capita
what are former centrally planned economies?
inter-region development gap
- e.g. Russia, Romania
- for much of 20th century, were riled by communist government and industries were under government control rather than private companies
- since 1989 and the decline on communism, most of these countries have re-entered the global economy
- transitional economies (transit from former centrally planned to free market economies) –> re-entering global economy has been a difficult time of re-adjustment
- GNP per capita remained average or even fallen as their industries struggle to modernise and compete in the global market
what are newly industrialising economies (NIEs)?
inter-region development gap
- a select group of developing countries that over the last 30-40 years, have sustained a high rate of economic growth
- e.g. Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong
- experienced phenomenal GDP growth rate, even higher than that of DCs, and some consider themselves to be developed countries
- High GDP per capita
- attractive destinations for FDI –> part of the global shift of economic activity from DCs to Asian NIEs and then to LDCs
- manufacturing sectors accounts for at least 30% of GDP
- high trade-to-GDP ratio, e.g. Singapore’s 400%
- when Japanese companies first decided to locate abroad in the 1960s in the quest for lower labour costs, they looked to the most developed of their neighbouring countries - South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore
- however, as economies of 1st gen NIEs grew stronger and more diversified, cost of wages increased significantly
- Japanese and Western TNCs began to seek locations in 2nd gen NIEs (Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand) where recent improvements in physical and human infrastructure now satisfied their demands but where wages were still low
- with time, process repeated itself to include 3rd gen NIEs (China, India, the Philippines), emerged in late 1980s/early 1990s
-economic success led to sharp rise in income, improvement in jobs, wages,, education, healthcare, housing, overall quality of life
What is BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China ad South Africa) economies?
(inter-region development gap)
- emerging economies, account for 45% of world’ population and amongst the world’s fastest growing economies
- control 15% of global economy, 13% of global trade volume, and 41%of world’s foreign exchange reserves
- by 2050, would be wealthier than G6 industrialised nations (USA, Japan, Germany, France, Britain, Italy)
- economic strengths: low labour costs and abundant resources
- China and India are already dominant suppliers of manufactured goods and services, lower labour and production costs make them attractive to TNCs
- Brazil and Russia are global suppliers of raw materials: Brazil in soy and iron ore, Russia in oil and natural gas
- BRICS suffered the least in 2008-9 global financial crisis than the world as a whole
- due to high domestic demand for their own manufactured goods and lower reliance of exports
- have begun to pull the global economy out of the crisis
what is least developed countries (LDCs) economies?
iner-region development gap
- nearly half the population of the 48 LDC - some 400 million people - remain in extreme poverty, compared with less than a quarter in any other DC
- mainly landlocked with inhospitable climate
- low GDP per capita, weak human assets, and high degree of economic vulnerability - high proportion of population live on less than US$1 a day; found mainly in Africa (sub-saharan) and Asia(Bangladesh, Laos, Myanmar, etc.)
- highly marginalised and poorly integrated into the global economy - left out of global flow of trade, investment (FDI) and production
- narrow economic base - heavily dependent on a single commodity for export earnings
- highly dependent on food imports which are strongly affected by rise in food prices and unfavourable terms of trade
- vulnerable to external shocks especially international commodity price volatility - have little surplus to deal with shocks and domestic savings are very low
- need external aid t break out of vicious cycle of poverty and to fund social services, large-scale infrastructure projects and industrial development
- little prospect for rapid economic development in the foreseeable future
what is heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) economies?
inter-region development gap
- e.g. Haiti, Honduras, Liberia, Somalia, many African Sub-Saharan countries
- unable to industrialise and economy is still dependent mainly on export of primary products for their income
- most primary products (apart from oil) have fallen in value in world market – have volatile prices depending on the demand for these primary raw materials
- imports from other countries are highly prices, thus placing HIPCs to experience unfavourable terms of trade, causing them to become poorer
- many borrowed money from international banks or richer governments to help them develop, but now have to repay large debts
- are trapped in the cycle of poverty and debt –> GNP per capita is low and continues to fall
- marginalised by globalisation