2) Formation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

promoter

A

ppl who are planning to form a corporation but haven’t yet. take prelim steps

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

promoter as agent of contemplated corporation

A

is NOT!

corp doesn’t exist yet, so can’t be the principal to an agency rship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

promoters binding future corporation

A

can’t

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

rship btwn promotors (and result)

A

mutual agency, partnership-type.

RESULT: their ks are binding on each other, joint + several

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

personal liability of promotors for k

A

when promoter enters k on behalf of not-yet-existing company

they ARE (usu) personally liable, regardless of whether say ‘obo corp’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

personal liability of promotors for k: exceptions

A

NOT liable if:
1) preincorporation k specifically says promotor not liable
OR
2) circs demonstrate that other party agreed to look only to corp. for performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

so now the corp exists – is it liable for pre-incorp ks from promoters?

A

No, UNLESS
1) adoption
2) novation
(it didn’t exist so couldn’t ex. ratify)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

new-existing corp: adoption: def

A

1) express: board passes resolution
2) implied: corp accepts or acks the benefits of the k

CANT RATIFY, only adopt (bc agency)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

new-existing corp: novation: def

A

ALL: 1) promoter, 2) the other party to the k, and 3) corp. agree to the substitution of corp. as party to k in place of promoter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

new-existing corp: adoption: result re. promoter liability

A

yes still personal liability for promoter, corp. liable too

NOTE: promoter is entitled to indemnification from the corp.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

new-existing corp: novation: result re promoter liability

A

no more liability for promoter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

becoming a corp: stages

A

1) incorporation

2) organization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

incorporation: reqs

A

1) proper articles of incorporated

2) executed + filed w SOS (dnn to be by promoters), inc fee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

properly executed arts of incorp must include

A

1) signatures of directors if named, or incorporators
2) name of co
3) applicable statement of purpose
4) name/address of agent SOP
5) address of corp
6) number of shares of each class can issue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

name of corp: reqs

A

1) not taken

2) NO req to say “corp” etc (excepc close corps)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

statement of purpose

A

usu: “any lawful activity”
only need to be more specific if: law/accounting/banking/trust co/insurance

CAN make it limited if you want

17
Q

ultra vires

A

corp can’t do k or activity beyond scope of powers.

18
Q

ultra vires: applicability

A

not very applicable bc usu powers are broad. AND bc in CA, can’t be raised as defense against 3rd party

19
Q

effective date of incorporation

A

date of filing by SOS, not date submitted.

SOS filing is usu conclusive proof that properly incorporated

20
Q

organizing corp: steps

A

1) name directors (if not already)
2) appoint officers
3) bylaws
(3+2 can be done by either incorporators or directors)

21
Q

organizing corp: effect of failing to do so

A

shareholders might have personal liability for corp debt/obligations (pierced veil)

22
Q

de facto corp

A

you thought you were a corp but weren’t – rare today bc SOS certificate is conclusive evidence of incorp

23
Q

corp by estoppel: exs

A

misfile articles of incorp
misname your corp on a doc
etc

24
Q

corporation by estoppel: def

A
  • -k dispute btwn 3rd party and entity believed to be a corp
  • -court can estop EITHER from alleging that it wasn’t really a corp/isn’t liable
  • -if would unjustly expose corp to liability or deny relief to 3rd party
  • -if equity demands (justice)
25
Q

corporation by estoppel + tort

A

nope just for ks (bc other party hasn’t dealt w them like a corp)