2. experimental methods Flashcards
laboratory experiment
dirrect manipulation of iv: experimenter manipulates the IV and measures the DV
control: high levels of control aims to control extraneous/ cofounding variables so the only difference in conditions is the IV. control group acts as a control for a baseline comparison
randomisation: participants are randomly allocated to conditions to redues extraneous variables
strengths of a laboratory experiment
easily replicated
high levels of control
allows experimenters to check reliability and if results are consistent
internal validity
easier to control potential confounding variable
increases the ability to establish between iv and dv
weaknesses of a laboratory experiment
reduces ecological validity
high levels of control mean the environment has become artificial and different from everyday life situations
questions the accuracy to measure the complexity of human behaviour
demand characteristics
participants know they are being researched
reduces internal validity
field experiments
investigations carried out in natural environment eg homes or school
situations where it is important research is carried out in natural environments
still manipulates iv and measure dv but can only attempt to control extraneous variables
participants are unaware are in an experiment
field experiment strengths
high levels of ecological validity
in natural surroundings so behaviour is representative of real behaviour
more confident generalising findings to other situations
demand characteristics are lower
participants don’t know they are partaking so can’t guess the aims
increases internal validity as we are more sure the DV has measured what is aimed to
field experiment weaknesses
time consuming
less participants being gathered
reducing population validity so difficult to generalise
difficult to have full control
not possible to predict everything that could occur and but controls in place more extraneous variables
reduces ability to establish cause and effect decreasing internal validity
natural experiment
take advantage of naturally occurring events where the researcher has no direct control of the IV
participants are already assigned a condition eg researching the effects of a smoking ban and comparing smoking levels before and after
ethical and practical reasons this is sometimes the only experiment suitable
natural experiment strengths
high levels of ecological validity
take place in natural setting so representative of behaviours naturally occurring
confident generalising results to other situations
natural experiment weaknesses
behaviour being displayed is limited
researcher has no control over situation so the behaviour the researcher wants to study may only happen rarely
reduces available opportunities to replicate the research to test the reliability
event isn’t planed so no control of extraneous variables
not possible for researcher to predict everything
reduces confidence in establish cause and effect reducing internal validity
what is a quasi experiment
use a pre-existing IV usually a character trait that doesn’t vary so aren’t randomly allocated eg age, gender
carried out in either controlled or more natural conditions