2. CONTEMPORARY PERSPECTIVES OF THE FAMILY Flashcards
New Right Perspective
.Nuclear Family is ‘natural’
.Lone parents are unnatural & harmful to society
.Traditional values
.Over generous welfare state
Charles Murray - New Right
non-traditional types of families are to blame for educational failure, high crime rates, low employment, health problems & the ‘dependence culture’
Murray - Underclass
. Has formed which is to blame for the majority of society’s problems (particularly poor child rearing practices) . This underclass is made up primarily of lone-parent families
Criticisms of New Right
.Feminists = NF is based on patriarchal oppression and is a cause of gender inequality
.No evidence that children in lone-parent families are more likely to be delinquent compared to those with 2 parents
.Marxists = NR just want to keep the rich rich; they want to take burden away from the state
.Marriage is not always ‘Functional’
Modernism
. Assumes that that the social world is fixed, rigid & structured &, as such, it can be studied by looking at fixed, rigid structures
. eg the Nuclear Family
.Individuals have little choice or agency
.Behaviour is predictable and structured
.Only small levels of variety
Postmodernism
.We no longer live in a ‘modern’ society which is predictable and ordered
.New, chaotic stage
.There is no single, dominant family structure today
.Fragmented into lots of different types
.Gives people more freedom and choice in lifestyles
→BUT causes more instability
Late Modernism vs Postmodernist
Late Modernists agree with Postmodernists that there is much greater choice and freedom in people’s lives
BUT do not believe that people are as free as postmodernists suggest
.There are still underlying patterns, and shared experiences of relationships that are a consequence of our living in a ‘late-modern’ .society – rather than families just being completely diverse and random.
.For example, a divorced woman (who has made that choice!) cannot just be completely free and have loads of choices - Connectedness Thesis
Giddens - Modern Love
In the modern era, marriage and family life = based on romantic love. It WASN’T based on equality and led to the dominance of men, but was still ideal in modern society. Bound to stay together until death and remain faithful throughout = foundation of family life
Giddens - Reflexivity + Plastic Sexuality
Entering era of late modernity led to development of reflexivity. People began questioning the idea of marriage and the reasons behind it.
→ Led to emergence of plastic sexuality.
.Sex becomes leisure pursuit rather than having it for the sole reason of childbirth
Giddens - Confluent Love replacing Romantic Love
Emergence of plastic sexuality changes the nature of love.
Confluent love - love which lasts only as long as it benefits the lover.
More choice = more divorce. Led to pure relationship (real love and not sense of duty).
→ This is good = more equal opportunities between men and women. But still not perfect. Pure relationship more of an ideal than something most have achieved – a trend though.
Giddens’ Evaluation
Strength: explains high rates of divorce and the greater variety of family forms (search of PR). Also shows why marriage remains popular = quest fot PR
Weaknesses: Jamieson (feminist) argues little evidence PR have become widespread – gender inequalities still stop this from happening (patriarchy).
Giddens - Reflexivity as key
.Pre-modern times = instititutions governed by tradition. Modernity came around and people started to apply reason to ideas and changes
.Traditions are less important = instead reflexivity means people can now make choices based on reason and rationale. People can now construct their own identities, and not as confined by fixed social structures (like functionalism and Marxism argue).
.e.g. self-help books, magazine columns, ‘how to raise a family’ books etc.
Giddens - Pure Relationship (1992)
.supports the idea that families are more diverse nowadays and suggests that it is because of the increase of the ‘choice-based’ society
.the improved knowledge & availability of contraception and the increased independence of women
.allowed couples to define their own relationships rather than have them forced on them. This creates ‘Pure Relationships’ based on love and care as opposed to old-fashioned notions of ‘tradition’ and ‘duty’
.This means that with more choice, personal relationships inevitably become less stable and can be ended more or less at will by any partner = LEADS TO INCREASED FAMILY DIVERSITY
Giddens - Same Sex Relationships
sees them as leading the way towards new family types and creating more equal relationships = ‘pioneers’
= not influenced by traditions to the extent that heterosexual couples are
= relationship is based on choice and equality
Beck - Individualisation Thesis (1992)
.Beck argues that we now live in a ‘risk society’ where tradition has less influence and people have more choice.
.As a result we are more aware of risk because having choice means we spend more time calculating the risks and rewards of different courses of action available.
.Today’s risk society contrasts with the modern society of the past with its stable nuclear family and traditional gender roles.
. though the traditional patriarchal family was unequal and oppressive, it did provide a stable and predictable basis for the family by defining each member’s role and responsibly
More choice