1st Flashcards
What are the 4 types of abnormality
- statistical infrequency
- deviation from social norms
- failure to function adequetely
- deviation from ideal mental health
What is statistical infrequency
Describes behaviour as abnormal if it is statistically infrequent and normal if it is in the range that is typical of most people
What is the shape of a normal distribution curve
bell shaped
In the middle is high which shows the most frequent thing and then either side of it are the infrequent things creating a bell shape
What are the limitations of statistical infrequency
- some abnormal characteristics can be positive and this suggests that its not as is not the norm
-Not everyone unusual benefits from a label - the cut off points are rather arbitrary (random) eg someone with an IQ of 70 is normal but someone with an IQ of 690 is abnormal
- some disorders are statistically frequent yet still abnormal (ie by deviation from ideal mental health standards)
- cultural and historical relativism, in other cultures different things are considered normal or abnormal and in history certain things were normal but now are not etc
Strengths of statistical infrequency
- objective definition- once a way of collecting quantitative data has been decided, the data is based on real, unbiased data
- no value judgements are made- abnormal behaviour wouldn’t be seen as wrong or unacceptable but simply less frequent
If someone has an IQ below __ they have i____________ ____________ ___________
70
Intellectual disability disorder
What are social norms
The implicit or explicit rules a group has for the acceptable behaviors, values, and beliefs of its members
someone would have an abnormal iq it is was below ___ or above ____
70
130
pros using deviation from social norms as a definition of abnormal
- can be used to help diagnose and therfore help people
- only classifies undesirable traits
- May be more culturally relative as long as go by the specific cultures social norms
cons of using deviation from social norms to define abnormal
- could potentially lead to discrimination or continuation of discriminatory and problematic views eg women working was abnormal etc
- leads room for harsh punishments if people don’t agree eg Russia imprisons gay people
- is contextual eg time of day or location of behaviour as wearing a bikini on a beach isn’t weird but wearing one in an office is
- DSM-5 eg is based on what is west deems socially normal so same rules can’t be applied for all places
a key feature of the not functioning accurately definition for abnormality is it causes …
distress and suffering for the individual or people around them (this is important as some individuals may not be under distress because they don’t recognize their condition)
what signs did rosenhan and seligman propose to show when someone is not functioning adequately
- when someone no longer conforms to social standard interpersonal rules
eg maintaining eye contact and respecting personal space - when someone experiences severe personal distress
- when a person’s behaviour becomes irrational or dangerous to the themselves or others
what are the 7 criteria rosenhan and seligman proposed for abnormality if they are met
- if they are unpredictable
- maladaptive behaviour (not adequately adjusting to situations etc)
- personal distress
- irrationality
- observer discomfort
- violations of moral standards and unconventionality
What are the strengths of failing to function adequately
- relatively easy to judge as can easily list behaviours eg dress self etc
Limitations of defining abnormality as failing to function adequately
- subjective judgement , have to decide whether the individual is distressed by their behaviour or not
- hard to decide if the person is failing to function adequately or just deviating from social norms
- cultural relativism this definition if likely to result in differences in diagnosis when applied to different cultures as the standards in different cultures may be different
Unlike the other definitions of abnormality the … definition attempts to define normality
Deviation from ideal mental health
Who came up with the deviation from ideal mental health definition
Jahoda (1958)
What are Jahoda’s 6 elements of optimal living?
Self attitudes - having a high sense of self esteem and a strong sense of identity
Personal growth and self-actualisation - the extent to which a person develops to their full capabilities
Integration - eg being able to cope in stressful situations
Autonomy- being independent and self regulating
Accurate perception of reality
Mastery of the environment - eg having the ability to love function at work and in interpersonal relationships adjust to new situations and solve problems
Strengths of deviation from ideal mental health
- Positivity = Emphasis on positive achievement rather than failure. A positive way of addressing mental health
Limits of deviation from ideal mental health
- most people would be considered abnormal as most people don’t fit all of these standards
- cultural relativism
What are subcultures and how are they impacted by abnormality definitions
A social group within a society
Dominant social group usually seen as normal while subcultures as abnormal
What are mental disorders that have been found to be specific to certain cultures called
Culture bound syndromes
Phobias are __________ disorders
anxiety
What are the characteristics of all mental disorders
Cognitive
Emotional
Behavioural