16 markers Flashcards
1
Q
- OUTLINE AND EVALUATE TWO OR MORE DEFINITIONS OF ABNORMALITY
(Deviation of social norms)
A
- One definition of abnormality is known as the deviation from social norm definition.
- A social norm is an unwritten rule about what is acceptable within a particular society.
- Therefore, according to this definition, a person is seen a abnormal if their thinking or behaviour violates these social norms of what is acceptable.
- For example, if someone was walking around the streets of London naked, you might think they were abnormal.
- However, this same behaviour in a remote African tribe would be considered perfectly normal a part of their culture.
2
Q
- OUTLINE AND EVALUATE TWO OR MORE DEFINITIONS OF ABNORMALITY
(Limitation of deviation of social norms?)
A
- One issue with this definition of abnormality is that social norms change over time, an issue referred to as hindsight bias.
- For example, homosexuality was regarded as a mental illness in the UK until 1973, often resulting in institutionalisation, but is now simply considered a variation of normal behaviour.
- This means that, historically, a reliance upon deviation from social norms as a definition of abnormality may have resulted in violations of human rights where people, by today’s standards, were deemed ‘abnormal’.
- It could be argued that diagnoses upon these grounds may have been used as a form of social control over minority groups as a means to exclude those who do not conform.
3
Q
- OUTLINE AND EVALUATE TWO OR MORE DEFINITIONS OF ABNORMALITY
(Context?)
A
- How far an individual deviates from a particular social norm is mediated by the severity of their ‘behaviour’ and the context.
- For example, when someone breaks a social norm once this may not be deviant behaviour, but persistent repetition of such behaviour could be evidence of psychological disturbance.
- Likewise, someone walking topless on a beach would be considered normal but adopting the same attire for the office would be viewed as abnormal and possibly an indication of an underlying psychological problem.
- As a consequence, this definition fails to offer a complete explanation in its own right, since different conclusions are reached in different situations and contexts
4
Q
- OUTLINE AND EVALUATE TWO OR MORE DEFINITIONS OF ABNORMALITY
(FFA)
A
- According to the Failure to Function Adequately (FFA) definition, a person is considered abnormal if they are unable to cope with the demands of everyday life and live independently in society.
- Furthermore, to be classified as abnormal, a person’s behaviour should cause personal suffering and distress because of their failure to cope
- However, they may also cause distress or discomfort to other people who observe their behaviour.
- For example, someone who is suffering from depression may struggle to get out bed in the morning or they may find it difficult to communicate with their family and friends.
- Consequently they would be considered abnormal as their depression is causing an inability to cope with the demands of everyday life (going to work), whilst their behaviour is also causing distress and discomfort to relatives.
5
Q
- OUTLINE AND EVALUATE TWO OR MORE DEFINITIONS OF ABNORMALITY
(Limitation of failure to function adequately?)
A
- One weakness of the FFA definition stems from individual differences.
- For example, one person with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) may exhibit excessive rituals that prevent them from functioning adequately, as they constantly miss work; whereas another person may suffer from the same excessive rituals, but find time to complete their rituals and always attend work on time.
- Therefore, despite the same psychological and behavioural symptoms, each person would be diagnosed differently according to this definition, thus questioning the validity of this definition.
- This issue exemplifies the problem of taking a nomothetic approach in psychology.
- Definitions of abnormality typically take a nomothetic approach and try to identify a list of factors, or symptoms, that can be used to diagnose abnormal behaviour
- However, some psychologists, in particular Humanistic psychologists, would argue that this approach ignores the essence of being human (e.g. individual differences) and therefore an idiographic approach to defining abnormality might be more appropriate
6
Q
- DISCUSS DEVIATION FROM IDEAL MENTAL HEALTH AND FAILURE TO FUNCTION ADEQUATELY AS TWO DEFINITIONS OF ABNORMALITY. REFER TO RAYMOND IN YOUR ANSWER
A
- According to the Failure to Function Adequately (FFA definition, a person is considered abnormal if they are unable work to cope with the demands of everyday life (e.g. social or and live independently in society.
- Furthermore, to be classified as abnormal, a person’s behaviour should cause personal suffering and distress because of their failure to cope.
- However, they may also cause distress or discomfort to other people who observe their behaviour.
- Therefore according to this definition, Raymond could be considered abnormal because his symptoms are causing an inability to cope with everyday life as he is finding it difficult to ‘complete his homework.
- Furthermore, Raymond’s symptoms are also causing distress or discomforted, as ‘his teachers and parents’ have noticed his
7
Q
- DISCUSS DEVIATION FROM IDEAL MENTAL HEALTH AND FAILURE TO FUNCTION ADEQUATELY AS TWO DEFINITIONS OF ABNORMALITY. REFER TO RAYMOND IN YOUR ANSWER
A
- One strength of the FFA definition is that is takes into account the subjective personal experiences of people like Raymond.
- This definition considers the thoughts and feelings of Raymond and the issues he is facing and does not simply make a judgement based on a pre-defined list of symptoms
- This suggests that the FFA definition is a useful tool for assessing psychopathological behaviour as it takes into account the effect of a person’s symptoms of their everyday life
8
Q
- DISCUSS DEVIATION FROM IDEAL MENTAL HEALTH AND FAILURE TO FUNCTION ADEQUATELY AS TWO DEFINITIONS OF ABNORMALITY. REFER TO RAYMOND IN YOUR ANSWER
A
- However, one weakness of the FFA definition is the issue of individual differences.
- For example, one person who hears voices may be unable to function adequately, whereas another person may suffer from the same symptoms, but function perfectly well.
- Therefore, despite the same psychological and behavioural symptoms, each person would be diagnosed differently according to this definition, thus questioning the validity of this definition.
9
Q
- DISCUSS DEVIATION FROM IDEAL MENTAL HEALTH AND FAILURE TO FUNCTION ADEQUATELY AS TWO DEFINITIONS OF ABNORMALITY. REFER TO RAYMOND IN YOUR ANSWER
(Jahoda)
A
- Jahoda (1958) took a different approach to defining abnormality, suggesting that abnormal behaviour should be defined by the absence of particular, ideal characteristics.
- In other words, behaviours which move away, or deviate, from ideal mental health. Jahoda outlined a series of principle including: having an accurate view of reality; being able to integrate and resist stress; and being able to master your environment including love, friendships, work and leisure time.
- Therefore, if an individual does not demonstrate one these criteria, they would be classified as abnormal according to this definition.
- It could be argued that Raymond does not have an accurate view of reality as he is hearing voices which are not present.
- Furthermore, he seems to be unable to res stress as his parents and teachers have noted that he is anxious, and he is unable to master the environment, in particular his school work, as his symptoms are preventing him from completing his homework.
- Consequently, Raymond Would be seen as abnormal, according to this definition
10
Q
- DISCUSS DEVIATION FROM IDEAL MENTAL HEALTH AND FAILURE TO FUNCTION ADEQUATELY AS TWO DEFINITIONS OF ABNORMALITY. REFER TO RAYMOND IN YOUR ANSWER
(Strength of Jahodas study?)
A
- One strength of Jahoda’s definition is that it takes a positive and holistic view.
- Firstly, the definition focuses on positive and desirable behaviours, rather than considering just negative and undesirable behaviour.
- Secondly, the definition considers the whole person, considering a multitude of factors that can affect their health and well-being.
- Therefore, a strength of the deviation from ideal mental health definition of abnormality is that it is comprehensive, covering a broad range of criteria.
11
Q
- DISCUSS DEVIATION FROM IDEAL MENTAL HEALTH AND FAILURE TO FUNCTION ADEQUATELY AS TWO DEFINITIONS OF ABNORMALITY. REFER TO RAYMOND IN YOUR ANSWER
(Limitations of jahoda?)
A
- However, one weakness of the deviation from ideal mental health definition is the unrealistic criteria proposed by Jahoda.
- There are times when everyone will experience stress and negativity, for example, when grieving following the (death of a loved one.
- However, according to this definition, these people would be classified as abnormal, irrespective of the circumstances which are outside their control.
- With the high standards set by these criteria, how many need to be absent for diagnosis to occur needs to be questioned
12
Q
- OUTLINE AND EVALUATE THE BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH TO EXPLAINING PHOBIAS
(Two process model?)
A
- The two process model suggests that phobias are acquired through classical conditioning: learning by association, and are maintained through operant conditioning: negative reinforcement.
- According to the theory of classical conditioning, humans can learn to fear an object or stimulus such as a dog, by forming an association between the object and something which triggers a fear response, for example being bitten.
- In this example, the dog, which was originally a neutral stimulus, becomes associated with being bitten, which is an unconditioned stimulus.
- This pairing leads to the dog becoming a conditioned stimulus, which when encountered will elicit fear, a condition response.
13
Q
- OUTLINE AND EVALUATE THE BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH TO EXPLAINING PHOBIAS
(Operant conditioning?)
A
- According to operant conditioning, phobias are negatively reinforced where a behaviour is strengthened, because an unpleasant consequence is removed.
- For example, if a person with a dog phobia sees one whilst out walking, they might avoid it by crossing the road.
- This reduces the person’s anxiety and so negatively reinforces their behaviour, making the person more likely to continue avoiding dogs, thus maintaining their phobia.
14
Q
- OUTLINE AND EVALUATE THE BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH TO EXPLAINING PHOBIAS
Supported by research/ Watson + Raynor?
A
- The behaviourist explanation of phobias is supported by research evidence.
- Watson & Raynor (1920) demonstrated the process of classical conditioning in the formation of a phobia in Little Albert, who was conditioned to fear white rats.
- This supports the idea that classical conditioning is involved in acquiring phobias in humans and that generalisation can occur to other phobic stimuli.
- However, since this was a case study, it is difficult to generalise the findings to other children or even adults due to the unique nature of the investigation
15
Q
- OUTLINE AND EVALUATE THE BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH TO EXPLAINING PHOBIAS
(Strength of the behavioural explanation= application to theraphy?)
A
- A strength of the behaviourist explanation is its application to therapy.
- These ideas have been used to develop treatments including systematic desensitisation and flooding. Systematic desensitisation helps people to unlearn their fears, using the principles of classical conditioning, while flooding prevents eople from avoiding their phobias and stops the negati reinforcement from taking place.
- These therapies have been successfully used to treat people with phobias, supporting the effectiveness of the behaviourist explanation in helping people to overcome their phobias