1984 Whole Flashcards

1
Q

Duty of care for tresspassers

A

S.1(1)(a) duty of care is still owed to trespassers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a trespasser

A

Person who enters without inivte
Person whose presence is unkwon to the occupief
Has excced their power(Geary v Wetherspoon)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

In order to satisfy DOC

A

1 s.1(1) the dangrous state of premises (Keown v Coventry)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Second to satifsy duty of care

A

Occupier was aware of the danger
Occuiper knows the trespasser is in the vicinty of danger (Swain v Natui)
Risk is one the occipuer should reasonble expect to offer protection from (Tomlinson v Congletion)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Breach of duty for trespasser

A

The duty owed by an occupier to a trespasser is to take such carr as it is reasonable in all circumstances that the trespasser doesn’t suffer injury on premises because of danger
S.1(4)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is the breach risk for the trespasser

A

In order to decide if d took reasonable care for c wasn’t injured the court needs to apply (Tomlinson v Congleton)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

resultant damage for a trespasser

A

s.1(8) trespasser can only claim for personal injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

1st Defence

A

warning s.1(5) - occupier can above liability if they take reasonable steps in all circumstances to give warining of the danger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

3rd defence

A

consent s.1(6) no duty is owed to a person for the risks they are willing to take (Ratcliff v McConnell)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly